Private AI Agent Infrastructure. CA : GtAHbD7JD7xQJW9ai1fxdxKG65cKsbuCTukTNjRkpump || t.me/moltghost / github.com/Moltghost

Joined February 2026
22 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
👻 Moltghost — Last Update Self-hosted infra with AES-256 encrypted DB. zero-knowledge: your wallet, your key. deploy AI agents via @ollama on @runpod @nvidia GPUs with your own API key. model → GPU → deploy → live agent URL. built with OpenClaw 🦀 app.moltghost.io
8
4
13
930
Moltghost retweeted
My self-sovereign / local / private / secure LLM setup, April 2026 vitalik.eth.limo/general/202…
694
668
5,102
1,330,684
Filesystem Privacy & Security: The Forgotten Layer in AI Agent Deployment Why Filesystem Matters When we talk about AI security, the conversation usually gravitates toward prompt injection, model poisoning, or API key leaks. Rarely does anyone talk about the filesystem — the layer where your model weights sit, where your agent writes logs, and where secrets live between reboots. Readmore: medium.com/@moltghost/filesy…
2
3
441
Your AI agent runs as root. It can cat /tmp/startup.sh and see every secret you passed in. Filesystem security isn't optional — it's the difference between "isolated agent" and "open backdoor." Mount only what's needed. Read-only by default. Delete secrets after exec. We're building a fully private AI agent stack — 20 layers of security & privacy from inference to runtime defense. This is Layer 4: Filesystem.
1
1
7
556
Gm, deep in code audits, patching things up. Keep building, keep sipping ☕
3
9
416
🔍 I just audited MoltGhost's own infrastructure against the privacy standard we laid out in our "Self-Hosting Your AI Agent Gateway" article. Honest score: ~60% private. Here's what's already running on our own server: ✅ Express gateway — every request routed locally ✅ WebSocket server — real-time agent status, zero third-party relay ✅ Winston logger — logs stay on disk, never shipped externally ✅ JWT auth middleware — tokens verified server-side ✅ Ownership isolation — users can only touch their own deployments But here's where we're exposed: ❌ Database sits on Neon — a SaaS PostgreSQL. That means every wallet address, email, agent name, deployment config, and tunnel token lives on someone else's infrastructure. We preach "the gateway sees everything" — and right now, so does Neon. What's coming next: 1/ Killing the SaaS database entirely. Migrating to self-hosted PostgreSQL. Drizzle ORM makes this a 2-file driver swap — same schema, same queries, same migrations. Zero data leaves our infra. 2/ Zero-knowledge user encryption. This is the big one. Your Solana wallet becomes your encryption key. You sign a message → we hash the signature into an AES-256 key → your data gets encrypted IN YOUR BROWSER before it ever touches our server. Backend stores nothing but ciphertext. What the database looks like after this: email → "aes256:8f2j3k9x..." wallet → "aes256:m9x2p1q7..." agentName → "aes256:w3e8r2t5..." Not us. Not a hacker. Not a subpoena. Nobody reads your data without YOUR wallet signing for it. We're building infrastructure where even the operator is blind to user data. Self-hosted runtime zero-knowledge encryption = privacy that isn't just a feature — it's the architecture. More coming soon. 👻
5
2
13
475
Most people focus on inference for private AI. But memory is where things actually stay. Every chat, file, and tool output becomes part of the agent’s long-term context. That’s why in MoltGhost next phase, we’re pushing: - per-agent memory isolation - local vector storage - local embedding models - optional ephemeral memory Each agent has its own “brain” no shared storage, no external indexing So memory isn’t just stored — it’s contained. Inference is where data flows Memory is where it lives MoltGhost is built to control both
2
3
11
415
I just published Self-Hosting Your AI Agent Gateway: Why ‘Running Locally’ Is Not Enough medium.com/p/self-hosting-yo…

1
9
351
So instead of sending all that inference data outside your infra, we run it like this: OpenClaw → Qwen 3B → fully local In this demo, every prompt, system message, file context, and tool output stays inside the machine. No external inference endpoint No fallback to cloud No data leaving your runtime This is what controlling the inference layer actually looks like.
2
6
16
434
Inference is the most critical layer in OpenClaw. It’s not just “chat” — it’s the execution core. Every prompt, system message, file context, and tool output is sent into the model at this stage. If your inference endpoint points to external APIs, you’re not running a private agent — you’re streaming your entire runtime outside your infra. Even worse, some setups silently fallback to cloud providers or break tool calling when using “OpenAI-compatible” endpoints. Fully private means: OpenClaw → local inference (Ollama / vLLM) → local GPU No external calls No fallback providers No hidden routing If you don’t control inference, you don’t control anything.
2
2
6
303
your AI agent shouldn’t leak your data - prompts - memory - workflows if it’s not private, it’s not yours
2
9
323
MoltGhost Dexscreener just got an update. We’ve added GitHub and Docs so everyone can easily explore what we’re building and follow our progress. Check it out. dexscreener.com/solana/4gznd…
9
2
13
757
For now, we've disabled the free launch on the website. We're actively developing the new app manager at moltghost-app-manager.vercel… your private way to deploy OpenClaw easily & securely.

1
8
713
We sincerely apologize for the lack of updates over the past few days. Due to unexpected natural disaster conditions in our working area, our operations were temporarily disrupted. Thankfully, the situation has now been resolved and everything is back on track. We are now fully ready to resume work as usual. Starting today, we will begin rolling out several updates , stay tuned. Thank you for your patience and continued support $MOLTG
3
8
470
Just dropped - moltghost-builder A lightweight VPS service that builds custom HuggingFace LLM Docker images on demand — pulls the model via Ollama, builds, pushes to Docker Hub, and fires a callback when done. github.com/Moltghost/moltgho… #nodejs #docker #llm #huggingface
3
8
24
1,218
Moltghost retweeted
GM $MOLTG Still building MoltGhost. We’re currently working on several things behind the scenes. Our focus remains on improving the infrastructure and overall experience for running private AI agents on dedicated machines. More updates soon. 👻
4
11
19
1,122
Just shipped Llama 3.1 8B on MoltGhost 🦙 3 models now available: • Qwen 3 8B — all-rounder • Phi-4 Mini — fast & light • Llama 3.1 8B — strong reasoning One-click deploy. Dedicated GPU. No shared infra.
8
9
27
1,187
Behind the scenes, our dev team is still building MoltGhost. Starting with the MoltGhost UI — some parts are coded manually, while others use AI to move faster. But not everything should be generated by AI. Honestly, we’re getting a bit bored with the generic AI-generated UI everywhere, so we’re taking the time to build it the way we actually designed it. Thanks for the patience
1
7
22
913
This is exactly why we’re building MoltGhost. Local AI agents alone aren’t enough. You need private runtime, isolated compute, and wallet-native infrastructure to prevent access pattern leakage. Privacy for AI agents has to be full-stack.
Replying to @zengjiajun_eth
Crypto privacy is needed if you want to make API calls without compromising the information of your access patterns. eg. even with a local AI agent, you can learn a lot about what someone is doing if you see all of their search engine calls first-order solution to that is to make those calls through mixnet but then (or in fact, even without the mixnet) the providers will get DoSed, and they will demand an anti-DoS mechanism, and realistically payment per call by default that will be credit card or some corposlop "yeah we'll get to the privacy later" stablecoin thing so we need crypto privacy But yes, for privacy you have to think full stack. Local AI agent layer is very important. It is like longevity: if there are 10 things damaging your body, curing one of them increases your longevity by 11%, curing two by 25%, and curing three by 42% (1 / (1 - 0.3) minus 100% base). Risks from data leakage are similar, and so mitigations similarly compound super-additively.
4
10
28
1,957