Joined August 2022
233 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Anthropic should stop beating around the bush and commit to releasing Mythos, instead of building unnecessary hype around it. Claude Opus 4.6 is good, but still a long way from where @AnthropicAI and the Vibe Coding community need it to be. Here is where things stand with all the throttling and Opus nerfing debacle: 1. The usage limits are brutal. I hit the $200 Max plan weekly limit within 2 days of heavy usage. I have never hit the same even with 7-days of heavy usage. On the 12th April, Claude was essentially unusable for a few hours. As a gesture, Anthropic offered $200 in bonus credits, presumably because they knew the throttling was aggressive and Claude was playing dumb. 2. The bonus credits are not the relief they sound like. Today, Claude spent nearly $100 attempting to fix a single bug. I am now on the second bug, and it will likely exhaust the remaining credits just during the audit and planning phase. So until my limit resets, my options are to sign up for a second plan or sit idle on my project entirely. 3. The "fraction of the cost" argument does not hold up. Yes, Anthropic gives access to more compute at a fraction of the API cost. But it conveniently ignores the vendor lock-in and infrastructure adoption happening on Anthropic's terms. If the goal is to throttle models and reduce limits, the honest move would be to ship a model that actually justifies the cost per task, not one that burns $100 fixing a lightweight bug. Instead, this looks like softening users up for a Mythos launch priced at 2x Opus or more. That is what all this hype is quietly building toward. Stop performing transparency while withholding it. Stop acting above criticism while paying customers hit walls mid-project. If you want loyalty, earn it by actually caring about the people funding your roadmap. All of these daily releases mean nothing if the underlying core behind it is not even usable. @trq212 @DarioAmodei
1
1
2
231
Taking a break from coding for a few days. Hoping Anthropic finds a fix. Claude Opus 4.8 is performing really bad, and certainly not comparing it with Fable benchmark.
1
58
Claude Fable 5 limit-maxing tip: If you have a subscription renewal approaching, go heavy and exhaust your weekly limit. Then instead of letting your sub renew, let it cancel, or cancel it yourself. Resubscribe and your weekly limits are reset 😂
1
115
Recently signed up @outrank_so and trying to reach out to support. Couple of emails sent but haven't heard back anything. Does anyone know of a better way to reach out to them? @tibo_maker
1
3
1,539
Submitted my startup to @trust_mrr today. I'm wondering, why is there no PayPal as a payment provider? @marclou
PRWiz by @moqaiser just joined TrustMRR 🔁 MRR: $3.4k/mo 💰 Revenue (30d): $5.4k 💵 Total revenue: $88k 📈 Growth (30d): 58% 💳 Active subs: 2 trustmrr.com/startup/prwiz
1
29
Another day of @AnthropicAI discovering features that have already existed for a while. x.com/i/status/2034657768612…

Apr 17
Introducing Claude Design by Anthropic Labs: make prototypes, slides, and one-pagers by talking to Claude. Powered by Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable vision model. Available in research preview on the Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans, rolling out throughout the day.
88
It already did, you just didn't notice....
Apr 15
anthropic killed this, anthropic killed that, why cant anthropic kill LinkedIn
47
Anthropic should stop beating around the bush and commit to releasing Mythos, instead of building unnecessary hype around it. Claude Opus 4.6 is good, but still a long way from where @AnthropicAI and the Vibe Coding community need it to be. Here is where things stand with all the throttling and Opus nerfing debacle: 1. The usage limits are brutal. I hit the $200 Max plan weekly limit within 2 days of heavy usage. I have never hit the same even with 7-days of heavy usage. On the 12th April, Claude was essentially unusable for a few hours. As a gesture, Anthropic offered $200 in bonus credits, presumably because they knew the throttling was aggressive and Claude was playing dumb. 2. The bonus credits are not the relief they sound like. Today, Claude spent nearly $100 attempting to fix a single bug. I am now on the second bug, and it will likely exhaust the remaining credits just during the audit and planning phase. So until my limit resets, my options are to sign up for a second plan or sit idle on my project entirely. 3. The "fraction of the cost" argument does not hold up. Yes, Anthropic gives access to more compute at a fraction of the API cost. But it conveniently ignores the vendor lock-in and infrastructure adoption happening on Anthropic's terms. If the goal is to throttle models and reduce limits, the honest move would be to ship a model that actually justifies the cost per task, not one that burns $100 fixing a lightweight bug. Instead, this looks like softening users up for a Mythos launch priced at 2x Opus or more. That is what all this hype is quietly building toward. Stop performing transparency while withholding it. Stop acting above criticism while paying customers hit walls mid-project. If you want loyalty, earn it by actually caring about the people funding your roadmap. All of these daily releases mean nothing if the underlying core behind it is not even usable. @trq212 @DarioAmodei
1
1
2
231
Here's some math for those having a hard time understanding it. In the past one-week, I have paid nearly $239 in my monthly subscription, and about $200 in extra usage, and yet, I can't use it now until my weekly limit resets on Sat morning. There has to be a cost to value proposition in there somewhere 😀
19
My entire feed and the Reddit is full of ppl saying Opus 4.6 got nerfed. Why would Anthropic nerf its own models? 🤔
Claude is down again 😕 Too frequent downtimes lately 🤔
1
233
Claude is down again 😕 Too frequent downtimes lately 🤔
288
Yesterday was the worse Claude Opus 4.6 day for me in recent days. I probably used most amount of tokens I ever have, yet shipped the least! In fact, I am still sanitizing a lot of mess Claude created yesterday.
CLAUDE OPUS 4.6 IS NERFED. BridgeBench just proved it. Last week Claude Opus 4.6 ranked #2 on the Hallucination benchmark with an accuracy of 83.3%. Today Claude Opus 4.6 was retested and it fell to #10 on the leaderboard with an accuracy of only 68.3%. A 98% increase in hallucination. bridgebench.ai just confirmed that Claude Opus 4.6 has reduced reasoning levels and is nerfed.
Community note
The cited BridgeBench scores for Claude Opus 4.6 are from tests with different scopes: 6 tasks initially (83.3% accuracy) vs. 30 tasks recently (68.3% accuracy). Analysis of the 6 common tasks shows similar performance (87.6% vs. 85.4%), suggesting no major change. bridgebench.ai/hallucination/… bridgebench.ai/hallucination/… x.com/paul_cal/statu…
1
60
Every vibe coder to Claude Code after @AnthropicAI nerfed Opus... "DO NOT MAKE MISTAKES, DO NOT ASSUME ANYTHING, WORK AS A SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER"
1
42
Do you even realize where we are headed?
Mar 23
You can now enable Claude to use your computer to complete tasks. It opens your apps, navigates your browser, fills in spreadsheets—anything you'd do sitting at your desk. Research preview in Claude Cowork and Claude Code, macOS only.
23
Indexing 100s or 1000s of pages in Google isn't some kind of magic wand... Believe me, it has been very easy to mass-build pages for decades. Even when it worked, there was a lot that went into doing it right. Lately, it is actually worse for your website to put 10k senseless pages out there, than if you just stuck with your helpful pages.
Mar 20
Literally, PSEO isn’t working for me I indexed 10k pages and didn’t expect these results. - 5 total clicks - 756 total impressions - 22.6 Average position Don’t rely on PSEO better to focus on SEO
42
Dumb vibe coder question, but why would you need Figma, when you simply build prototypes, view in artifacts and have Claude code implement it? One less subscription and much faster workflow anyone...?
we’ve been using figma MCP claude code for design → code it’s not perfect and still needs a fair bit of polishing but it’s sped up our dev process by ~50% 😁
43
Claude Opus 4.6 with extended thinking on 100k token context. Felt dumber than 3.5 Sonnet. Not slightly worse. Noticeably worse. Bigger model, more compute, worse output. Something breaks when you push past the context window sweet spot. The "just throw more tokens at it" era is hitting a wall.
34
Claude down again 🙄
6
608
Just started using @WisprFlow and I am totally amazed by it. I have tried using a lot of speech to text, and none have really worked well. The list includes Google (Android), Microsoft (Windows), Anthropic (Claude) and many other apps I have tried. None have really worked well enough. All of the ones I have used before had a hard time properly recognizing my speech. Most seem to only work properly for like US/UK accents, and at a disadvantage for my Indian accent. WisprFlow closed that gap with flying colors 💯 Instant yearly subscription locked in 🙌
2
35
Claude Code continues to impress me everyday...... I have this n8n workflow running, which started failing from yesterday, because my @AnthropicAI API balance was exhausted. I only realized this today, and it had already failed like 100 times. Since @n8n_io doesn't have a bulk retry feature, it would have been exhausting to retry all 100 by myself. I asked Claude Code about it and all it asked me was the API key and the URL of my automation. I gave it, accepted a few permissions and went away. By the time I was back, Claude Code: - Built a script to fetch all the errors. - n8n didn't accept one of the parameters. - It rewrote the script and ensured everything works. - It accounted for things like rate limit between my connected nodes, and ran the script until 115 executions were retried and succeeded. - It reconfirmed every "queued" retry to ensure it completed successfully. - Asked me to rotate my API key upon completion. It gave me a complete report and even asked me if I want to keep the modified script for later use. The efficiency, self-learning and adaptation to the error, and persisting until everything is completed, as well as verifying everything, is basically something I wouldn't even be sure of, if I'd done it myself. Not to mention all the wasted time I'd have retrying all the executions, through n8n's interface which is notoriously bad at this if you have anything above 10 retries. Claude Max ($200 plan) is currently the highest ROI product available in the market.
2
60