Author of Free to Be Holy: A Biblical Theology of Sanctification // Lead Pastor @CC_Bham // Director of Research @WesleyBiblical // Fellow @CenPasTheo

Joined March 2010
740 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
What is holiness? I get that question frequently since the publication of Free to Be Holy. Here's how it's answered in the book: "God always does what’s right. He always does what he ought to do. For us, then, to be holy is to be formed in such a way that we consistently do what we ought to do—like God does" (3). To be holy is to embody the character of God. And that's the biblical vision for human life, start to finish. More here: amzn.to/40KPDol @OfficialSeedbed
8
33
1,795
Be sure to read this.
Check out my response to Scott Kisker’s article in Firebrand about the GMC view of scripture. timothytennent.com
3
651
Matt O'Reilly retweeted
I think the revisions have made for better Articles & appreciate the fact that the team really took seriously the suggestions from the wider Church.
1
1
2
125
Here's my response to Joel Green's recent critique in Firebrand Magazine of the proposed Article of Faith on Holy Scripture and my case for its adoption by the Global Methodist Church. I think Green's essay is substantively flawed in multiple ways. I explain here: theologyproject.online/post/…
1
2
6
3,232
Read the proposed Articles of Faith of the @GlobalMChurch here: irp.cdn-website.com/4829cd2f…

1
1
286
Here are my three main takeaways from today's panel discussing the proposed Articles of Faith for the Global Methodist Church. Read here: theologyproject.online/post/…
1
158
Here's my response to Scott Kisker's recent @FirebrandMag article criticizing the statement that "Scripture is without error..." in the proposed Articles of Faith. It turns out that this sort of language is a well-established part of our Methodist heritage, and we have much to gain by including it in the Article on Scripture. Read it here: firebrandmag.com/articles/gl…
3
5
368
Why is the Global Methodist Church considering new Articles of Faith? Should the language be updated? What's the process going forward? In this episode of Theology Project Dr. David Watson and I discuss these questions and more. Watch on YouTube: youtu.be/JBMJdgTrDpU Listen on your favorite podcast platform: theologyproject.podbean.com
1
2
5
428
It was fun. Hope it was informative.
This should be fun and informative. Coming up at 4 pm CST. youtube.com/live/t2uZ3exZLXo
1
7
346
What does it mean for us that Jesus Christ has a human nature? In light of the discussion around the proposed Articles of Faith (#5 in particular), I've put together a few reflections on how we Global Methodists might articulate our understanding of human nature in light of Christ's own fully divine and fully human nature. There's also a bit of background on why this proposal was offered now. Read it here: firebrandmag.com/articles/ho… @FirebrandMag @GlobalMChurch
3
3
3
426
William Burt Pope: “no desire of holiness can be vain.”
1
2
5
299
Here’s something I’ve learned this week. The fellow regarded as the best Methodist systematic theologian of the 19th century was not shy with regard to the language of “imputation.”
3
1
10
501
Classical Christology is just so elegant. Here’s William Burt Pope, the Methodist theologian, once again.
2
2
14
905
Matt O'Reilly retweeted
When someone you love has died--someone you lived with and knew intimately, someone whose face and hands are as familiar to you as your own--this word of resurrection can never be heard as a mere theory or idea. It is everything or it is nothing.
2
16
167
5,435
Lest you be mistaken, William Burt Pope wants to educate you on the identity of “the real Founder of Methodism.”
1
3
13
441
In the past, I would sometimes appeal to the “plain meaning” of various scriptural texts. I’ve stopped doing that. Not because I don’t think the Bible speaks plainly at times. Nor because I’ve given up on the perspicuity of scripture with regard to its teaching on salvation. I haven’t. No, I’ve stopped appealing to the “plain meaning” because that phrase is often used to discourage serious engagement in biblical interpretation. The “plain meaning” claim is frequently deployed to avoid dealing with legitimate challenges to whatever reading is supposed to be so certainly clear. It’s sometimes used rhetorically to suggest that one interpretation of the Bible is so obvious that we don’t need to do the hard work of exegesis and hermeneutics to understand it. If someone insists their view represents the “plain meaning” of some scriptural text, that’s your clue to scrutinize their interpretation all the more rigorously. Maybe it is the plain meaning, but you can’t know until you do the work.
2
2
20
2,180
❓❓❓What happens when a believer dies? What does it mean to "go to heaven?" What is the resurrection of the body? Why does it matter? 🗺️Explore those questions in this BONUS episode of Theology Project. 🎧Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas… 🎧Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/763… 🎧Podbean: podbean.com/ew/pb-beqkb-1a1d…
1
2
219
Why don't Methodists rebaptize people? In short, it's about God. In this clip, Dr. Jonathan Powers and I discuss the issues including: 1. WHY our theology of baptism doesn't allow it 2. HOW to shepherd people through the questions 👉Watch here: youtu.be/wdhmaIoJQL8
1
2
172
Prefer an audio-only format? 🎧Listen to the same conversation on the Theology Project podcast. 👉Get it here: podbean.com/ew/pb-pxnnh-19f9… 🔔And while you're there, go ahead and subscribe so you don't miss anything.
1
1
217
Want to get Theology Project in your inbox? Sign-up here: theologyproject.online/subsc…
103