Graduate in International Politics & Strategic Studies. Dabble in naval history. Frequently distracted by cricket.

Joined July 2009
1,679 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
The King George V class were the most modern British battleships of the Second World War. They are perhaps best known for their actions against Bismarck in 1941 and Scharnhorst in 1943, as well as the sinking of Prince of Wales in December 1941. (1/x)
14
28
278
Perhaps I am old fashioned, but if the SoS for Defence and the Armed Forces Minister resign on the basis that No. 10 and the Treasury are either unwilling or unable to fund the defence of the state appropriately, then that should be a resignation for both the PM and Chancellor.
35
383
2,418
29,783
Because they have clearly failed at the first duty of any government.
1
50
1,116
Matthew Warwick retweeted
BREAKING: The Treasury only offered the Ministry of Defence an extra £10bn in real cash for its investment plan over four years - the actual settlement was an additional £13.5bn but £3.5bn of that was regarded by military chiefs as treasury trickery. John Healey told the Prime Minister the promised funding was not enough to keep the UK safe.
8
53
186
19,218
Must be very bad then. Optimism that this will result in a better outcome? About zero.
My letter to the Prime Minister
1
5
35
927
Personally, I don't think £3bn pa in 'Defence Investment' is anywhere near enough, and the state seems to be pursuing "drones", "hybrid" and "tech" as an excuse not to make major investments. This is British exceptionalism in a very bad form.
6
19
147
5,761
War footing latest, part 465.
The situation inside the MoD is so bad that Britain is second bottom in a Nato league table that ranks member states based on the extent to which they are meeting their rearmament promises. The UK is currently 31 out of 32 countries on a list — which may be published by the end of the month — detailing how each country is progressing in hitting the alliance’s capability requirements. The only country below the UK is understood to be Iceland, which does not have a military. thetimes.com/article/fe3f6c3…
3
27
1,494
Sounds like we need some kind of ‘first minister’ or something to lead the government, set direction and the like. A year of wrangling seems to have only served to reduce £24bn to £13.5bn - £15bn…
DIP wrangling continues, with Treasury accused yday of using backlash against Whitehall cuts (to fund defence) to try & squeeze DIP envelope from £15bn to £13.5bn. Final figure still not locked in
1
5
35
2,964
Good. It’s a stupid idea that never should have been proceeded with the first place. On the other hand, probably means an overall cut to F35 numbers rather than reversion to an all-B Tranche 2, which is suboptimal to say the least.
NEW: Britain’s future fleet of fighter jets capable of dropping nuclear bombs is under threat in Sir Keir Starmer’s Defence Investment Plan (DIP). The Telegraph understands “serious conversations” are taking place at very senior levels of the military and Government over whether to cut or delay proposals to buy 12 F-35A stealth jets. Sir Keir announced the £1bn plan to buy the jets last year, but ministers are now believed to be considering the future of the RAF project ahead of the release of the chronically delayed DIP. The investment plan was due to be published last autumn, but a funding row between the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and Treasury has left it in limbo for months. The F-35As can carry the B61 bomb, an American-made tactical nuclear weapon. The B61 bombs are designed to destroy a smaller area than Britain’s current arsenal of Trident 2 D5 ballistic missiles, which can deliver 12 warheads capable of levelling a city. The jets would provide Britain with another rung on the “escalatory ladder of war” before the deployment of more damaging strategic nuclear weapons, defence officials said. They would be in addition to the planned 138 F-35Bs, which are built to fly off Britain’s two aircraft carriers but cannot carry nuclear bombs. However, according to those with knowledge of the DIP, the F-35A scheme is at risk as ministers attempt to save money and fund other military projects as part of “tough” decisions still being mulled over by Downing Street. One defence source said the future of the F-35A was being discussed and its funding could be delayed or cut entirely, citing talks between “two and three-star” military commanders. It is understood that the proposals for the F-35A are among many options being considered. However, no final decision has been made.  Full story: telegraph.co.uk/gift/f607a89…
3
2
26
1,617
The South Dakotas and Iowas are always an interesting comparison - the Iowas are 10,000 tons more for 5 knots of speed and /50 calibre rather than /45 calibre guns...
Two legends. Same nine 16-inch guns. Very different stories. USS Alabama (BB-60) was built for a fight, not a parade. At 680 feet and 35,000 tons, she was compact by battleship standards; a South Dakota-class bruiser designed to hit hard and absorb punishment. Top speed: 27.5 knots. Her war was the Pacific, and she earned it. USS Iowa (BB-61) was something else entirely. At 887 feet and 45,000 tons, she was longer than three football fields and fast enough (33 knots) to keep pace with the carriers she was built to protect. That combination of size and speed made her not just a battleship, but a bodyguard for the entire fleet. Alabama punched above her weight. Iowa simply outweighed everyone. The gap between them isn't just numbers. It's a statement about what the Navy needed at different moments. Alabama was the workhorse of classic fleet engagements. Iowa was a different animal; a ship that outlasted WWII, showed up in Korea, came back from retirement during the Cold War, and was still firing her guns in the Gulf War four decades after her commissioning. Both carry the same armament. Both are now museum ships. But Iowa's resume is longer, her hull is bigger, and her legacy is harder to summarize in a single war.
5
3
50
7,263
"Before 1987 every single ship in the British Navy was made by the Government." You probably don't need me to point out this is nonsense, and that private companies have been making British warships for centuries...
The £3.5bn HMS Prince Of Wales has broken down again in Norway. Before 1987 every single ship in the British Navy was made by the Government. Since 1989 they have ALL been built by Private companies and like HS2, Nuclear, Water and Mail. They are all garbage.
5
11
280
13,072
The battleship HMS Nelson, aground, outside Portsmouth harbour, 12 January 1934.
5
25
238
7,210
The irony of cutting defence spending because of a war.
🚨 NEW: Keir Starmer is considering cutting the planned £18bn increase in defence spending to £15bn over fears the Iran war makes it unaffordable [@thetimes]
13
89
1,367
70,165
On this day 1916, the Grand Fleet 'crosses the T' of the High Seas Fleet at the Battle of Jutland. In the words of Prof Marder, 'the greatest concentration of naval gunfire any fleet commander had ever faced'. Art by Claus Bergen.
23
148
9,185
The battleship HMS King George V, who on this day 1941 was part of the force that sunk the German battleship Bismarck.
4
16
213
4,167
The battle cruiser HMS Hood, seen c. 1931. Lost on this day 1941, with the loss of 1,415 of her crew of 1,418.
22
209
3,589
Setting aside that this is incorrectly called a 'Clarkson case' in McCartney's book on the Jutland wrecks, it feels like this singular photo is doing a lot to justify the claim that propellant was improperly stored in the British battle cruisers.
1
17
2,277
"If it doesn’t work in Ukraine I don’t want to buy it" is not how procurement should work for the United Kingdom and would border on incompetence. I'll be charitable and assume it's just a lazy soundbite...
Latest news article Defence minister wants 1,000-ship Royal Navy, built primarily on uncrewed platforms navylookout.com/defence-mini… #CNE2026 @LukePollard
1
12
87
6,795
See this a lot but most other navies don’t seem to agree? At least for the really high end stuff like AAW and BMD.
Absolutely the right step, though the readers of big bumper book of best boats are going to have an absolute melt down.
7
2
30
4,678
HMS Vanguard, Britain's last battleship, alongside in Portsmouth. Note she's already been laid up - the STAAG mounting on 'B' turret is missing, and her directors and 5.25-inch guns have been cocooned.
17
48
654
20,677
... has the Telegraph really interpreted out-of-sequence construction activity as being the ships "built in the wrong order" ...?
Babcock International has admitted it built the first two Type 31 frigates in the wrong sequence, forcing it to spend months making £140m of changes @Telegraph @Babcockplc @CommonsDefence @ModernNavy #RoyalNavy archive.is/2026.05.13-200813…
9
3
89
14,144