👀

A single onchain transaction can grant unlimited token approvals, route funds through sanctioned entities, or connect a wallet to exploit-linked contracts. Most users can't inspect raw transaction payloads manually. Neither can compliance teams operating at scale. Pre-sign transaction scanning changes the framing. Instead of reviewing activity after execution, you evaluate the transaction while the decision is still reversible. Unlimited approvals, drainer patterns, exploit-linked contracts, sanctioned counterparties, all detectable before a single signature occurs. For humans, and AI. All in one API.

Institutions holding or routing through stablecoins have no standardized framework for evaluating structural risk before a depeg event. In 2026, the regulatory consequence of that gap has a name: GENIUS Act compliance obligations. Current stablecoin risk assessments are static snapshots of reserve disclosures and smart contract audits. They miss dynamic on-chain signals like reserve ratio drift, redemption gate closures, and unbacked minting events that precede collapse by hours, not days. Webacy doesn't miss. Our real time risk ratings and asset integrity technology serves continuous monitoring for rwas, vaults, and every asset you care about.

Most vault risk frameworks are measuring the wrong thing. Here's what vault liquidity risk actually requires and why a quarterly audit won't catch it in time. 🧵

Our Vault Technical Risk Rating measures all four continuously, with sub-scores and hard floor overrides for critical conditions (e.g. redemptions closed = automatic floor, no exceptions). Every score traces to a specific structural cause. That's explainability that actually works. Ratings aren't an event. They're a signal. → DD.xyz

AML and KYC weren't built to catch structural failure. RWA protocols are losing millions to exploits. Every one of those hacks passed compliance screening. Here's the risk surface nobody's talking about. 🧵

GENIUS and MiCA set a compliance floor. But the FSB said it outright last October: even where stablecoin regulation is implemented, critical gaps remain in "robust risk management practices, capital buffers, and recovery and resolution planning." The frameworks assume structural risk monitoring. Most institutions don't have it.

$13.5M stolen from StablR via a single compromised governance key. Our systems flagged it before the peg broke. Here's what the data looked like. 🧵

This is the same attack class that took $80M from Resolv in March. Two events, two months apart, same sequence: compromised key, anomalous minting, depeg, cascade. The difference between catching it and missing it is supply velocity monitoring, not price monitoring. Price is already late. We urge teams to look at their governance structure, their admin key management, setup, and safety. Use the monitoring and alerting tools available. Set up risk intelligence systems internally (it's required through regulation anyways). Do more than the bare minimum.