State overreach. Its parents who must decide and parent their kids, not the bureaucrats in wesminster

Drop a like on my Astro milky way photo, just entered a competition! facebook.com/1325242672/post…

RT @Woke_66: Below is a letter sent by Tom Hayes, Labour MP Bournemouth East to the Mary-Anne Stephenson at the EHRC, with Bridget Phillips…

Haha

A trans person with a GRC could enter their legal sex, as this is on your birth cert. They are not asking for "original" birth certificate, as that's hidden away in special section D, so answering female here is fine. At the venue, the service provider would need to challenge you

RT @Woke_66: The idea that the Equality Act 2010 was designed to be one of the most draconian pieces of anti trans legislation in the world…

Wait, so "trans women are a risk" but we can have a WI that is an association of women and trans people, so a non binary man could join this WI? But if its women, its just biological women? This is really going to hurt women's only accociations!

This is an absolute joke! Its utterly unenforceable, especially in hospitals Parliamentlive.tv - Women and Equalities Committee

Where are these magical 3rd spaces going to come from? Most trans women just want integration, which we had, for decades. A trans woman can visit a female ward yet not be a patient on one.

So, the previous rules were ok then? She's clearly stumbling for words, and has never been in a night club!

Wait what? Are we making the rules up as we go along and she now agrees, we never had an issue for decades! But for a charity it's more complex? Make it make sense!🤦‍♀️

Its not illegal, and its unenforceable and the service provider takes the risk.

Tell me Bev, why you and other gender critical folks wrecked the GRA 2004, via the supreme court, if you are so against self ID, why attack the very gatekeeping we had in place for over 2 decades? It worked, and only 8-10000 were issued. Now we have an utter unenforceable mess

Why “Splitting the T from the LGB” Was Never Grassroots - And Why It Matters Now. Over the past decade, we’ve all watched the debate around "trans rights" intensify in the UK. What’s often missing from that conversation is a simple, uncomfortable truth: the push to separate “the T” from the rest of the LGBTQ community did not begin here...nor was it organic. It was a strategy. - and it was imported. A Divide‑and‑Conquer Playbook: In 2017, senior figures in the US Christian Right openly described a plan to “separate the T from the LGB” as a way to weaken LGBTQ equality. This wasn’t speculation — it was said on stage at the Values Voter Summit in 2017 and documented by the Southern Poverty Law Centre, and amplified by Right Wing Watch. The logic was brutally simple: Trans people were seen as the most vulnerable group. If you isolate them, you weaken the whole movement. If you frame trans rights as a "threat to women and children", you create a wedge. Sound familiar? The UK Connection. By 2018–19, UK political actors and media outlets were echoing the same narratives. Groups like the LGB Alliance emerged with messaging that mirrored US talking points almost word-for-word. Even their founders acknowledged the influence of US organisations like the Heritage Foundation — a group with a long history of opposing LGBTQ rights and reproductive freedom. This wasn’t a coincidence - it was a pipeline! Why This Matters for All of Us: When you trace the origins of today’s anti‑trans rhetoric, a pattern becomes clear: The same organisations pushing anti‑trans policies are also pushing anti‑abortion laws. The same funders opposing gender recognition reform and access for trans people to single sex spaces are also fighting against contraception access, dignity in dying and sex education. The same narratives used to target trans people are now being used to undermine women’s rights more broadly. This isn’t about “debate.” It’s about rolling back equality — strategically, systematically, and internationally. The UK Is Not Immune - in fact, the UK is viewed as a "bridgehead" for Europe and beyond. That's why the UK "debate" is so toxic. We’re now living through the consequences: 1: A dramatic rise in anti‑trans hate crimes over the last ten years. 2: On average, 7 trans hostile articles each day in the right-wing press. A media landscape saturated with lies, misinformation and moral panic. 3: A political environment where trans people are treated as a culture‑war commodity. 4: A growing willingness to pit marginalised groups against each other. And yet, the public conversation still treats these developments as if they emerged spontaneously — as if they were simply the result of “concerns” or “questions” rather than a coordinated campaign. We Can Choose Better: The truth is this: trans people were never the threat. The threat comes from those who benefit when communities are divided, rights are eroded, and fear is weaponised. The UK has a proud history of standing up for fairness, dignity, and equality. We can honour that history by refusing to import someone else’s culture war — and by recognising that none of us is safe when any of us are targeted. Because equality isn’t a zero‑sum game. And solidarity is how we win. Happy Pride - let's keep calling this out! translucent.org.uk/splitting…

Actually, its not "irrelevant", because if someone makes a mistake, a biological woman may well be harassed accessing a space. The "clarification to the EA2025 ensured that, but you built a paper tiger than cannot be enforced. Most trans women, have no balls to give!

RT @Woke_66: The idea that the Equality Act was intended to be one of the most aggressive pieces of anti trans legislation in the world is…

RT @IndiaWilloughby: Ah! Problem solved. This is the current running total of MPs signing to oppose the introduction of trans apartheid. h…

RT @IndiaWilloughby: I’m sorry, but the fixed UKSC ruling is incompatible with the Gender Recognition Act 2004. It has completely misunders…