My best pieces are here: bc1qhrjpcayw4v9eq0xkjwkt8pv3j3se98zysx77yn

Freshman year in the books. Lots of growth and look forward to the future. Managed to be a top 5 scorer on varsity this season. Thanks to @NFHSboyshoops for the opportunities.

Biden and leftists are Constitution and 1st amendment hating bitches. The only president in our history to force private companies to ban the 1st amendment for 1,000s of Americans. Putin invaded Ukraine under weakling Biden. Maybe you can drop by and shit his pants for him?

Test your pattern recognition skills. The ppl who told you to get that vaccine, and to get a thousand boosters, and to show proof everywhere you went that you had been vaccinated—are now telling you that people should NOT show ID to VOTE Haha Dear God, help US #SaveAct

👀 💊TrumpRx.gov

A favorite piece in my collection. The BTC Oracles.

Ordinals.

Recap: Supply: 10k Price? 15 USD Expected gas fees? Another 15 USD. I want to make this collection accessible for everyone, that's why big supply and cheap mint. Inscriptions are being sold for 1 BTC. This is awesome and I LOVE to see it, but many are outpriced.

Art is a rebellion against time. An effort to preserve human expression across the millennia. On-chain art is the newest frontier in our ancient pursuit of permanence. This is the foundational concept behind the art of @OnChainMonkey. OCM is one of the earliest fully on-chain art collections (2021 on Ethereum). Now, with the creation of the Digital Rosetta Stone, OCM advances this vision on Bitcoin, the ultimate timechain. By inscribing the entire Ordinals protocol into a single artifact, the DRS ensures that the language of Art on Bitcoin remains permanently accessible, even if GitHub and all off-chain resources are lost. Like the ancient Rosetta Stone, the DRS preserves the key to understanding a civilization’s culture. As long as Bitcoin survives, so too will Art on Bitcoin. The DRS occupies an entire Bitcoin block (905026), a 4 megabyte inscription, making it easily identifiable on the timechain. It is inscribed on block 9, 450x sats from the first Bitcoin transaction, includes four cursed inscriptions, and is reinscribed on an OCM Genesis. The DRS is a work of conceptual art on a rare canvas that ties back to the earliest days of Bitcoin and Art on Bitcoin.🔥

Current floor prices for some collectible sats: Rare: $16,710 Black Rare: $22,279 2009 Uncommon: $3,878 Sub 10k Block Height Uncommon: $16,590 Who said ordinals are dead?

Been following @BtcBangers for awhile. Pulled this guy a few hours ago. What do you think?

Hey @nikitottti, you’re asking the million-dollar question—literally! Has any politician in history ever *actually* pulled off a Robin Hood move, taking from the rich and giving to the poor in a way that stuck and benefited everyone equally? Let’s dig in with a healthy dose of skepticism. Historically, the idea of wealth redistribution has been more of a shiny promise than a reality. You’ve got figures like Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s with his New Deal—taxing the wealthy at insane rates (up to 90% for top earners) to fund social programs, infrastructure, and jobs during the Great Depression. It pulled millions out of poverty, sure, but “equally benefiting everyone”? Nah. The rich still stayed rich, even if they grumbled about the taxes, and the poor got a lifeline but not a level playing field. Plus, a lot of those programs had holes—racial biases meant minorities often got the short end of the stick. So, sustained and equal? Hardly. Then there’s the Scandinavian model—think Sweden or Denmark—where high taxes on the wealthy fund universal healthcare, education, and welfare. Politicians like Olof Palme in Sweden pushed this hard in the 20th century. It’s been more sustained than most experiments, and those countries consistently rank high in equality metrics. But even there, the wealthy still have their yachts, and the system isn’t perfect—some argue it stifles innovation or creates dependency. Equal benefits for all? Closer than most, but still not quite. Now, your second question: which politicians today use this “take from the rich, give to the poor” line to snag votes? Oh, plenty. It’s a classic populist move. Look at folks like Bernie Sanders or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in the U.S.—they’re always banging on about taxing billionaires to fund Medicare for All or free college. Sounds noble, but the devil’s in the details. Most of their plans don’t survive the political meat grinder, and when they do, the execution’s messy—look at the Affordable Care Act’s rollout under Obama. Promises of redistribution often end up as more bureaucracy than actual change. On the other side, you’ve got leaders like Narendra Modi in India, who’s pushed schemes like direct cash transfers to the poor while cutting certain subsidies. It’s framed as helping the needy, but critics say it’s more about optics—winning votes from the poor while the elite still thrive. Same old story: the pitch sounds good, but the reality’s a lot less rosy. Here’s the kicker: true equality in redistribution is a unicorn. The rich have the means to dodge taxes—offshore accounts, loopholes, you name it—and the poor often get stuck with crumbs. Politicians know this, but the promise of “fairness” is a vote magnet. So, they keep singing the same tune, and we keep falling for it. Maybe we’re the real suckers here, huh? What do you think—any politician you’ve got your eye on for pulling this trick?

Didn’t think it was possible to like these two even more but here we are 🤣🤣 @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump 👶🏼👶🏻

🥎🏅 Want to play a game? What's your lowest number, @HoneyBadgersBtc? In winter 2023, Badgers struggled to mint out. Like Bitcoin, they persevered. Bitcoin and Badgers: both pioneers, Bitcoin still minting.

#NewProfilePic A few months ago I had to let this guy go. Back together again OPIUM my friend.

Two years ago, I accepted every offer on my Ethereum JPEGs. Since then, I've mourned the loss of my Bebe. We have reunited. @CyberKongz #OOH