My theory is that the dot-com crash around 2000 was prolonged because investors left the stock market and ran towards real estate, which was a highly popular investment in the early 2000s until it popped around 2008.
Today, real estate remains unpopular and there are no other comparable alternative investment to the stock market (except maybe commodities for now).
This situation is forcing everyday investors to remain confident in the stock market no matter what.
As a result, it becomes difficult for the market to stay down for long, because every dip gets bought by everyday investors who feel like they have to buy and stay invested.
The alternative is bleak and people can’t have that, especially when cost of living is inflating.
Until there is a viable alternative asset that rivals the stock market, maybe the stock market will remain a self-perpetuating confidence machine that investors just won’t let go.
Ever heard of “The Lost Decade”? 📉
Between 2000 and 2010, the S&P 500 basically went nowhere overall.
Dot-com crash.
Financial crisis.
Years of volatility.
Imagine investing consistently for 10 YEARS and barely seeing progress in your portfolio.
It’s easy to say “I’m a long-term investor” when markets are flying.
But if something similar happened again, do you genuinely think you could stay invested and keep buying for a decade with little or no gains? 🤔