Joined April 2022
424 Photos and videos
May 28
brave's entire business has always been to be an alternative ad network. nothing more, nothing less. their browser's main purpose has always been to remove webmasters' own advertisements, and replace them with brave's own ads without giving said webmasters any compensation
May 28
A fresh Brave install in 2026: sponsored ad wallpapers on new tab page by default (opt out). Brave VPN, News, Talk, Leo (AI), Rewards and other revenue-milking bloat is advertised/pinned by default. Analytics and "phoning home" by default. Google as default search engine in most regions by default. Sponsored search engines like Russian Yandex in CIS countries by default: github.com/brave/brave-core/… Brave has an ad branch that handles advertising within the browser: brave.com/ads. Brave does on-device ad targeting based on cohorts and interests, just like what Chrome used to do and what Google was largely hated for (remember FLoC?). This applies to additional (opt-in) rewarded ads, shipped as part of Brave. Brave has injected referral IDs to crypto-related URLs entered into the omnibox in the past, intentionally, by design: x.com/CR1337/status/12692014… github.com/brave/brave-brows… reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/… Brave also uses dark patterns to drive users away from turning off ads in their browser. For example, an article linked from the "opt out" button in the browser has a wall of text making excuses for ads before the actual steps needed to be taken to disable them: support.brave.app/hc/en-us/a… kind of hypocritical for brave to judge firefox for lesser bullshit, don't you think?
1
3
69
2,481
May 28
despite being such a webmaster, losing a ton of money every month on adblock, i think users should block ads. but replacing them with brave's own is nasty. privacywashing that as "we're saving you from those pesky invasive ads!!" is even more nasty
1
27
431
May 28
i remember when people were starting to block brave's useragent for this reason and then brave suddenly added the "privacy feature" where they made it so it doesn't have its own useragent. real smooth, guys
1
20
405
May 19
tried out this AI "vibe coding" thing for the first time by asking the computer a little question i don't get how anyone uses this
8
5
179
9,915
Apr 17
This is getting ridiculous My blog almost never gets spam (mostly because I block VPNs, sorry!), but recently there has been an insane uptick in spam. The reason? Indian "security researchers" asking LLMs to spam the blog to then send me Markdown emails (without pgp key).
2
2
35
1,154
Apr 17
People have probably heard by now about this happening to open-source projects (ie curl) but it's happening to practically all websites at this point, and it's undermining actual security by wasting people's time on these scam artists.
1
6
676
Apr 17
Is some AI company giving out free/cheap credits or something? The Tetris community has also suddenly seen an uptick of bottom-barrel slop all of a sudden.
1
6
631
osk retweeted
ウィマーマ・サーガ dance but TETR.IO Full Short ↓↓↓↓ youtube.com/shorts/LxTt7apLZ… T-Mino Chan's moving again 😭😭😭
1
4
25
965
Feb 11
have we forgotten that "the os is just webpages" has been a thing since windows 98? that "classic control panel" is also just a webpage remember how XP tried to make people think you needed a ".NET Passport" to use the internet there has never been a "year of the windows desktop"
Microsoft doesn’t stop you from uninstalling Edge just to annoy you or take away your freedom. It’s because, in modern Windows, Edge is no longer just a browser but rather part of the operating system itself. A lot of Windows components now depend on Edge’s rendering engine (WebView2) to display content. Things like Settings pages, help screens, widgets, login flows, Microsoft Store content, and even some third-party apps use Edge in the background to render web-based interfaces. So if you completely remove Edge, you’re not just deleting a browser, you’re removing a shared system dependency. That can break core features or make parts of Windows unstable. Because of that, Microsoft treats it like a protected system component and restricts normal users from uninstalling it. Linux works differently because of its design philosophy. Nothing is “sacred” or protected at that level. The system assumes the user has full control and full responsibility. If you have root privileges, you can remove anything even critical parts like the bootloader, kernel, or libc. Linux won’t stop you, warn you much, or lock it down. If you delete the bootloader, the machine simply won’t boot. That’s not a bug; it’s intentional freedom.
2
28
1,457
Feb 11
this guy's pages are really fun to browse through: toastytech.com/guis/win98.ht… it's a time capsule of old OSes and in particular captures well how people have thought about microsoft over time and, more importantly, how none of it has really changed

12
867
osk retweeted
23 Nov 2025
thats my goat i love you andrew
1
7
34
5,089
osk retweeted
Added tetrio and colonist to the database.
2
2
74
2,784
7 Nov 2025
I'm Bac k
8
56
2,022
31 Oct 2025
PapPal
29
1,636
29 Oct 2025
3
8
101
2,650
28 Oct 2025
3
1
37
1,463
19 Oct 2025
testing something. Can you see this message? (C)
24
1
108
3,523
19 Oct 2025
testing something. Can you see this message? (B)
17
70
1,904
19 Oct 2025
testing something. Can you see this message? (A)
24
118
3,483