I ask questions, constantly. bookofconcord.org | revero.com
Joined June 2018
- Tweets 9,121
- Following 216
- Followers 733
- Likes 25,595
640 Photos and videos
“Above all, love one another deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins.”
1 Peter 4:8 BSB bible.com/bible/3034/1pe.4.8…
16
I think the best thing about Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire is the amount of millionaires he has created by doing so.
Jun 13
I think possibly the best thing about Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire is how angry it makes a bunch of losers who've never built a thing in their lives.
1
3
27
Patrick Kuehner ©✝️🏵 retweeted
Ladies and gentlemen, she said yes.
214
39
3,771
41,238
If there’s a Presidential candidate that can stop this kind of stuff, that’s the one I’d prefer.
I visited an LCMS church while on vacation. I asked what I need to do to ensure I receive Communion (because it’s not my usual church and we practice closed communion), the guy looked at me like I’m crazy. He said they only do the 1st & 3rd Sundays. I felt so let down.
1
1
96
Patrick Kuehner ©✝️🏵 retweeted
Absolutely, here is my definition of Christian:
Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
And the catholic faith is this, that we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; Neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the Substance. For there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Ghost. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost is all one: the glory equal, the majesty coeternal. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Ghost. The Father uncreated, the Son uncreated, and the Holy Ghost uncreated. The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the Holy Ghost incomprehensible. The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Ghost eternal. And yet they are not three Eternals, but one Eternal. As there are not three Uncreated nor three Incomprehensibles, but one Uncreated and one Incomprehensible. So likewise the Father is almighty, the Son almighty, and the Holy Ghost almighty. And yet they are not three Almighties, but one Almighty. So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God. So likewise the Father is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Ghost Lord. And yet not three Lords, but one Lord. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by Himself to be God and Lord, So are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say, There be three Gods, or three Lords.
The Father is made of none: neither created nor begotten. The Son is of the Father alone; not made, nor created, but begotten. The Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son: neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding. So there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Ghost, not three Holy Ghosts. And in this Trinity none is before or after other; none is greater or less than another; But the whole three Persons are coeternal together, and coequal: so that in all things, as is aforesaid, the Unity in Trinity and the Trinity in Unity is to be worshiped. He, therefore, that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity.
Furthermore, it is necessary to everlasting salvation that he also believe faithfully the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ. For the right faith is, that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and Man; God of the Substance of the Father, begotten before the worlds; and Man of the substance of His mother, born in the world; Perfect God and perfect Man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting. Equal to the Father as touching His Godhead, and inferior to the Father as touching His manhood; Who, although He be God and Man, yet He is not two, but one Christ: One, not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh, but by taking the manhood into God; One altogether; not by confusion of Substance, but by unity of Person. For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and Man is one Christ; Who suffered for our salvation; descended into hell, rose again the third day from the dead; He ascended into heaven; He sitteth on the right hand of the Father, God Almighty; from whence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies, and shall give an account of their own works. And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting; and they that have done evil, into everlasting fire.
This is the catholic faith; which except a man believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.
Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are Christians.
If you disagree. Please give me your definition of "Christian" below.
8
11
177
5,070
Proverbs 16:18 — “Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.” The loving thing to do for the “proud” is to reject their error, and try to bring them righteous humility.
1
33
🤣There it is. A way out of accountability.
May 27
Most casual sex that men have is rape and they know it.
The definition is simple: sex without consent. And there is no real consent when consent is misinformed.
They get away with it because women are trusting or blame themselves.
Rather than condemn male deception, men condemn women for being victims just like they used to condemn women for getting physically raped.
It’s the same pattern.
Community note
The legal definition of rape does not include deception about relationship intentions or future commitments in most jurisdictions; rape by deception is narrowly limited to cases like impersonating a specific known person or fraud about the nature of the act. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_d… yalelawandpolicy.org/solving-riddle… egattorneys.com/ca-penal-code-…
53
This is worse than “thought crime”. This is the “possibility of thought crime.” That means absolutely *anything* one voices, *could* be a crime. That means any “thought”, voiced or not, becomes dangerous to oneself. Which means, no such thing as truth.
These two paragraphs of my verdict are crucial for everyone to read and understand.
"Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” 1⃣
"For Van Langenhove to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the Anti-Racism Law." 2⃣
This means you can go to jail for "inciting hatred" even if your statements were 100% factual (see 1⃣) and even if you did NOT incite concrete acts of hate (see 2⃣).
The benchmark of "inciting hatred" , a crime punishable by prison, is thus "saying something that has the potential of inciting someone to have a general attitude of disapproval regarding a protected group". This means literally any criticism of mass migration is now a punishable offence. If you cite a statistic, and someone could potentially think less of a protected group (like migrants) because of it, you can be jailed.
The craziest part is that there is no defence possible against this. I brought the scientific studies that I cited to court, but the judge didn't care 1⃣. I also proved that the hundreds of students present at the lecture included students of all different political affiliations, and everyone was able to voice their opinion or ask questions. The lecture went very calmly, so obviously nobody was incited to hatred. But this too did not matter 2⃣, because if the judge says he believes there is the possibility that someone COULD be incited to "a general attitude of disapproval", this is enough for the judge to send me to jail, even without any evidence.
I'm telling you this to warn you that by the time these hate speech laws have come into place, it's already too late. You will NEVER be able to beat these laws in court. You have to stop them before they are implemented. Let my fate be your warning.
1
1
19
The thing that’s missing in the Christian sphere online, and the thing that young men are seeking: how to live a Christian life. Real practical things: behaviors, mindsets, interactions, being a “good” neighbor, etc. Figure out how to “content-ize” that and attract swarms.
37
I think this is your worst take ever.
AMEN
60
Patrick Kuehner ©✝️🏵 retweeted
It's so sad that humanity really got to the point of being dumb enough to believe protein drinks are healthier than beef
1
2
17
296
1) They overspent then blame the cost of living on being childless? 2,000 sq ft is a lot. 2) This excuse is so old, you’ll never be ready with that kind of mentality. You have kids, then you do what needs to be done to raise them. The right partner is all the preparation needed.
Apr 28
"Rilee Stewart and Brock Goodwin always imagined having several children...
But that vision shifted once they settled into their 2,000-sq-foot house with a $3,200 mortgage...
They realized that even with one child, they would most likely need more space."
nytimes.com/2026/04/26/busin…
1
63
What works are the works of the Lord that save?
How many times does the phrase "faith alone" appear in the Bible? And what specifically does the Bible say about "faith alone"?
1
36
Patrick Kuehner ©✝️🏵 retweeted
Mar 21
Complete fiction. The digestive system actually works a whole lot better without fibre.
1
4
34
2,129
Patrick Kuehner ©✝️🏵 retweeted
It's genuinely embarrassing for someone to be this confidently uninformed
101
47
934
82,261
Aaannnddd just like that, no one cares about the Epstein files.
20
Cope
Jan 30
The “Mormons aren’t Christians” movement is nothing more than a small but loud corner of American evangelicalism.
That argument has now lost.
Not faded. Not weakened. Lost.
It no longer persuades the public, and it no longer commands moral authority.
What remains is noise, produced for self-confirmation rather than persuasion, repeating claims the rest of the country has already moved past.
The reason is simple. Americans know what Christians look like. And they know Latter-day Saints.
They know Latter-day Saints as people who worship Jesus Christ openly and constantly. Who pray in His name. Who center weekly worship on His atoning sacrifice. Who teach their children to follow Him. Who organize their entire religious life around His resurrection.
For almost everyone who is asked, that settles the question.
Repeated surveys confirm it. A clear majority of Americans regard Latter-day Saints as Christian, including many who disagree with their theology or would never join the Church. They still recognize Christian faith when they see it.
The real fight is not over Jesus Christ. Latter-day Saints affirm His divinity, His Atonement, and His literal resurrection without hesitation. That is not where the argument lives.
The disagreement turns on something else. When evangelicals say Latter-day Saints aren’t Christian, they are often defending a philosophical definition of God shaped by Greek thought. When Latter-day Saints say they are Christian, they are pointing to something simpler and older: worship of Jesus Christ as the resurrected Savior.
You can disagree with that claim. But you cannot honestly say it places Latter-day Saints outside the Christian story altogether.
Teachings evangelicals portray as wildly unchristian, including belief in an embodied Father or distinct divine persons, were taught and believed by many early Christians. Scholars have shown these ideas were common in the first centuries, before later church authorities narrowed acceptable belief through frameworks shaped heavily by Greek philosophy. They are not historical oddities. They are part of Christianity’s early record.
That is why the heresy label now rings hollow. It is not grounded in how Christianity began, but in how certain groups later decided its boundaries should be enforced.
And enforcement is exactly how it feels.
The most telling feature of today’s “Mormons aren’t Christian” rhetoric is its irrelevance. It persists in online echo chambers and almost nowhere else.
Outside those circles, the verdict is already in. Latter-day Saints are widely recognized as Christians. Their faith is visible, durable, and centered on Jesus Christ. The attempt to deny that reality no longer persuades anyone who is not already committed to denying it.
America has spoken. Ancient history is on its side. And momentum points the same way.
Latter-day Saints are Christian.
54
25 Dec 2025
“Today in the city of David a Savior has been born to you. He is Christ the Lord!”
Luke 2:11 BSB bible.com/bible/3034/luk.2.1…
1
116
Patrick Kuehner ©✝️🏵 retweeted
20 Dec 2025
Baptism is Gospel, not Law.
Baptism is gift, not obedience.
Baptism is of God, not of man.
26
23
291
17,797
11 Dec 2025
“Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call Him Immanuel.”
Isaiah 7:14 BSB bible.com/bible/3034/isa.7.1…
3
163