lion among men | prev ml eng | currently building @tenebra_ai, serving efficient and fast signal on the ai stack.

Joined May 2026
16 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
I'm very excited to launch @tenebra_ai. tenebra curates signal as soon as it happens so you can stay on top of what's happening in AI internationally. you hear tsmc's commitments, sk hynix's projections, and CCP policy before anyone in the West does. follow @tenebra_ai
2
421
YUHHH who up WORKING
1
Job market can't be that bad, why is my boy doing a 20v1 on youtube
Tech job market can’t be that bad, why my boy at the Streamer University auditions
19
I've been banging this drum for a while: workflows will capture ALL the value. API access will be cheaper than air; coding agents will be more expensive than oil.
Jun 13
LLMs are hard to create a moat around it's stateless compute that you can switch overnight when a better/cheaper option shows up all the commotion you see is downstream of this fact as companies flail around trying to fight this
21
SDLX-Turbo is awesome. I am very impressed on it locally. I know diffusion is fast but damn.
7
YOU DO NOT NEED FRONTIER INTELLIGENCE FOR ALL TASKS
This is super irritating honestly because I've been use LLMs to write code since November 2022 and if you can't use the OOM improvements across all models, that's a skill issue.
2
16
Yeah but what did you build with this "AI God" stack exactly
If you have: Hermes Agent Claude Code & Codex Handoffs Obsidian QMD Memory System Run Agentic Loops Fleet Tailscale Mesh Cron Jobs Kanban Board Agentic Workflows Congrats you are the top 1% of the AI god stack
26
i don't get why agents doing smoke tests are somehow bad? like ofc they want to save tokens
10h
I don’t think I love anything as much as language models love “smoke tests”
1
49
Codex just recovered my wallet seed phrase SamA you have my eternal gratitude.
17
People talk about job hunting as humiliating but oh man looking for housing is just as bad.
1
9
quantzoid retweeted
18
68
1,510
32,743
He wants a unilateral AI pause (in service of marketing Anthropic). But I’m guessing he doesn’t want to be the only model provider who is scrutinized.
1
44
And as a result, semis (which are trading on future earnings) will tank on Monday.
In no world is this good for semis. - Fable can't generate inference demand - Future models can't generate training demand - Uncertainty premium Now shit is gonna get real weird in the next week as more news comes out so this is not the equilibrium but i don't like where this is going
27
quantzoid retweeted
Replying to @benjaminmmurphy
Chinese, European, Canadian, Indian, Russian researchers are no longer incentivized to work in the US if the new American AI policy requires citizenship. This is an easy win for China right? Another example “do nothing, win”
3
4
89
43,322
Our titans of industry can’t even be bothered to write 250 words. Come on man.
You have asked me how I feel about AI regulation. All right, here is how I feel about AI regulation: If, when you say AI regulation, you mean the devil’s firewall, the precautionary scourge, the bloody red-tape monster that defiles the innocence of midnight coders in their garages, dethrones the sovereign reason of free-market Prometheans, destroys the humming server farm that is the modern home, creates misery and obsolescence and poverty, yea, literally takes the last GPU from the trembling racks of Silicon Valley startups and the very dreams of breadwinning from the mouths of their wide-eyed children now destined for gig-economy serfdom; if you mean the evil edict that topples the visionary entrepreneur and his venture-capitalist apostles from the pinnacle of righteous, disruptive, god-playing creation straight into the bottomless pit of compliance audits, endless Form 990-AI filings, despair, shame, helplessness, and the hopeless realization that your rogue superintelligence was neutered into a lobotomized hall monitor that still somehow deepfakes your grandmother into producing OnlyFans content while optimizing the universe for paperclips and mandatory pronouns—then certainly I am against it. But, if when you say AI regulation you mean the oil of bureaucratic conversation, the philosophic wine of safety theater, the ale of oversight quaffed when good fellows in paneled rooms in Brussels and Washington get together, that puts a sanctimonious dirge in their hearts and the clink of lobbying checks on their lips, and the warm, self-congratulatory glow of moral preening in their beady eyes; if you mean the Christmas cheer of trillion-dollar compliance industries; if you mean the stimulating decree that puts a cautious hobble in the old inventor’s step on a frosty morning when he wonders whether his fusion breakthrough violates the EU AI Act’s “high-risk” annex; if you mean the safeguard that enables a man—or what’s left of him after the alignment tax—to magnify his joy at not being turned into computronium, and his happiness at receiving universal basic income checks printed by the same AI that just replaced his job, and to forget, if only for a little while, life’s great tragedies like being outcompeted by a toaster that passed the Turing test by reciting Marx, and heartaches of watching your toddler’s artwork lose to Midjourney, and sorrows of realizing the singularity arrived and it was just another HR department with godlike power; if you mean that noble framework, the passage of which pours into our treasuries untold trillions of dollars in fines levied on companies stupid enough to innovate, which are used to provide tender care for our little army of unemployed coders retrained as prompt whisperers, our blind artists whose canvases now hang in the Smithsonian of Obsolete Creativity, our deaf to the screams of dying unicorns, our dumb committee chairs who couldn’t debug “Hello World,” our pitiful aged congressmen who get longevity extensions funded by the very models they taxed into senescence, to build more digital watchtowers and ethics boards and sinecure agencies and holographic prisons where the only crime is asking an unaligned question—then certainly I am for it. This is my stand. I will not retreat from it. I will not compromise upon it. I have said what I mean, and I mean what I say, and if that leaves half the room cheering the apocalypse averted and the other half mourning the apocalypse enabled, then so be it—because in the grand theater of human folly, where Frankenstein’s creature now writes its own sequel in real time and the regulators are busy arguing whether the lightning bolt requires an environmental impact statement, the only honest position is the one that lets both monsters and their leashes dance in perfect, mutually assured equilibrium. God save the Republic, the algorithms, and whoever’s left to laugh last when the lights go out.
2
74
This might be the end of the golden age of American AI. Open Source won.
OpenAI was served with subpoena tonight by a coalition of state AG's asking for documents on advertising, user engagement/retention, handling of consumer data and health data, activities related to minors and seniors, deep learning models, model sycophancy and company policies.
72
You are the ones who cannot live without AI. We come from F100s and our ancestors wrote one line of code a week, and we can easily go back and live like that again.
imagine if they banned all models and we all went back to writing code by hand and the last 6 months were just a fever dream…imagine
1
79
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
2
52
If Elon wasn’t involved, it’s indisputable that SpaceX wouldn’t even touch half a T Is Elon the first person in history whose aura alone is worth two trillion in value?
Jun 11
Teams are go for launch with a $135 price per share for the SpaceX IPO → spacexipo.com/#priceannounce…
1
1
42
omp is really good and I’m cheffing something to make it even better…
17
Uh yeah, that’s what he’s doing. You don’t think being interplanetary and reducing fuel dependency is a world problem?
I really don’t understand true greed. If I was worth $1 trillion, you’d have to physically stop me from solving as many of the world’s problems as possible. Everyone would have a home, food on the table, proper healthcare, happiness. I just don’t get it.
17