Its qubic-network:native you should be watching, you just don't know it yet.

The Qubic development engine is accelerating in Epoch 217. 🛠️ Core protocol updates are shipping fast: critical fourq hotfixes merged, QBay SC patches deployed, and 5 active PRs expanding multi-dimensional revenue and the Qassandra AI foundation. With the WolfPack contract live and the 15.5M TPS bare-metal architecture setting the speed record over networks like Solana and ICP, the ecosystem focus remains firmly locked on uPoW execution and Aigarth's training methodology. Read the full dev and ecosystem brief 👇 pastebin.com/5m7LaTU1 qubic-network:native 👾

Raw dataset → huggingface.co/datasets/Davi…

The majority of AI projects show you the winners, while quietly burying the failures. Qubic just published all of them. 34 runs. 5,936 architectures. 68,664 files. The biggest accomplishments alongside every dead end, uploaded raw to Hugging Face. It’s called the Neuraxon Game of Life: a world where tiny spiking brains live, eat, mate, and explore, while a search hunts for the one design that survives best. Every brain was scored on a single fitness number plus ten biology-based metrics. The champion (trial 191, fitness 9.40 on 24 neurons) sits alongside architectures that scored as low as 3.77 and died out. Even if you never touch crypto, this is why open data matters: • A researcher can test the method. • A skeptic can audit the claim. • A builder can take the best brain and push it further. The data is labeled honestly: raw research output, rough edges and all, under an open license. An actual lab notebook. What would you build with 5,936 evolving brains?

This week, a US government order forced Anthropic to cut off access to its most capable models - Fable 5 and Mythos 5 - for every foreign national on earth. Overnight. Someone outside the system simply flipped a centralized switch. This is the core risk of centralized AI: it works - until someone with authority decides it shouldn't work for you. Think about the scale of that. Tomorrow, any data could fall under control, any service could be switched off. We build on decentralized Qubic for the opposite reason. An AI marketplace that lives on a decentralized network can't be shut down by one order, in one country, for one group of people. No single party holds the off-switch. Staying decentralized and accessible isn't a feature for us. It's the whole point. #Qubic and #TesserAI - we come from beyond

So the scarcity case is not just a written promise. It is an emission rate you can watch fall. A burn rate you can watch climb. And a mechanism you can go read about. The halving explained → qubic.org/blog-detail/qubic-…

And here is the difference that is not about supply at all. Bitcoin’s schedule was set once, in 2008, by one anonymous person. Unchangeable. Take it or leave it. Qubic’s halvings are proposed and voted on-chain by the 676 Computors running the network. Twice proposed. Twice passed. Twice recorded.

Now put the two sides together. Emissions step down with every halving. Burns step up with every new contract, query, and instruction. Two lines moving toward each other. Where they cross, the network goes net deflationary. Not by decree, but by usage.

But emission is only one side of the coin. On the other side, Qubic burns. • Smart contract execution fees: burned. • Oracle calls: burned. • IPOs on the network: burned. • When Outsourced Computation goes live in July, every off-chain instruction joins the list. Every unit of usage permanently destroys QU.

The halving mechanics, in plain terms. Every week, Qubic emits new QU to the miners securing the network. The proposal the Computors just approved cuts that mineable supply in half at Epoch 227 this August. Roughly 450 billion down to roughly 225 billion per week. Same job as Bitcoin’s halving: slow the printing.

Two numbers decide Qubic’s supply. One just got cut in half by an on-chain vote. The other climbs every time the network gets used. The halving that just passed is a step toward the line where they cross. 🧵

Todo parece indicar que #Aigarth de $Qubic será la verdadera #AIG descentralizada, sin un Centro de Datos que el gobierno pueda cancelar @Quorumdidit @anna_aigarth qubic.org x.com/i/status/2065350146687…

The highlight one of them picked: Building the tool that checks community smart contracts, then watching it run on the first real community submission. That is what building Qubic looks like up close. Methodical, careful, and run by people who treat a live network with the seriousness it deserves. → github.com/qubic

Every change gets caught by another human first. Community code cannot just merge in. At least one core dev must review it. Two for the more complex code. And that happens before it ever touches the main code. They call it the four-eyes rule, and they apply it to their own work too.

Does AI help? Yes, but less than you would think. It is a useful second pair of eyes, good at catching small slips. But it does not know Qubic’s hidden rules. It will confidently flag things that are fine and miss things that are not, because this codebase does not look like the internet it learned from.

The environment is hard on purpose. They write in C but without the standard library most programmers lean on. Basic things you would normally take for granted, they build and test themselves. Smart contracts run in a locked sandbox with rules the code has to respect.

One core dev told the story of their first release. The network started, ran one tick, then got stuck. A tiny bug took ages to find. Their words, roughly: “I sat there wondering if I was even in the right place.” That is the job of a Qubic dev. High stakes, small mistakes, very public.

A weekend look at the people actually building this thing, because the last "Tech on Deck" AMA got honest about it. Building Qubic is not normal software work. When your code is live on the network and it breaks, it does not just throw an error. It costs real money. 🧵

1/8 Qubic founder Sergey Ivancheglo made an interesting prediction: "AI ASICs will eventually become ternary." Not binary (0 and 1). Ternary. This could fundamentally change how AI chips are designed. Here's why 👇

Crafting basics are a necessary step for survival in My Last Match. If you're looking to start playing, this is where you start. The crafting guide is live on the wiki: mylastmatch.fandom.com/wiki/… Read the guide, watch the basics tutorial below, and you're ready. The game is moving fast, so the guides update with it. If you are new, MLM assets are needed to join. 177 Survival Kits left at 70M QU each on our website. Voucher code gets you in 👉 mylastmatch.net/beta 20,500 Matches are already in the game, added gradually. 🔥 Loot them now, swap for Qubic at 1 Match = 1,000 QU later. $QUBIC #SurvivalMMORPG

ASICs for #AI will be trinary.