#백야의꽃길 #blossomsofthewhitenight The mole placements on Tei is 👌I spy 4 on him, did I miss any? Shuraka please get to work, there better be bite marks all over them next chapter

Sea paradise x Persona 30th anniversary collaboration was so worth it. Going through to the tunnel of water listening to Memories of you and seeing Makoto waiting at the end wrecked me. They absolutely nailed the atmosphere there. And there were so many persona fans going around the park from all over the world too. Great to see so much love for persona. #p30th

Hilarious that they blocked me but still so obsessed enough to qrt my post, then proceed to make excuses for TJ raping Ian yet again by saying it's a common thing in manhwa. Call TJ out as a rapist he is please, you have no problem doing so with Jo no? What Jo would do to Ian when they are together you ask? No need to imagine anything the author already answered that. Cook for Ian, decorate his house with flowers, take him on star gazing dates, eat his ass, enjoy all the riding Ian initiate everywhere in the house. Too bad they would have to squeeze what little left of their brain to imagine a domestic life for that end game couple because they got nothing, not even smut that they begged for 😆😆😆😆

OMG it's for real and not a figment of my fantasy 😭💞🥳

The way some ppl talk about Jo gives away the whole game. They need him small enough to dismiss but guilty enough to carry every accusation that belongs elsewhere. He becomes w.e. the defense needs in the moment: irrelevant when his impact’s inconvenient, dangerous when his love’s harder to minimize. Jo slander always sounds so forced. Jo didn’t drag Ian into the gang, hide him for years, tie him to debt, send him back toward drug drops, sabotage the clean life he could’ve had, make power more important than choosing him openly or turn Ian’s guilt into personal gain for years. Jo didn’t build the world Ian kept trying to leave. He was the person Ian chose differently with. Ian tried to stay monogamous for him, opened up to him, changed through him, protected him from the world he thought would ruin him, thought of him after leaving & cried when Jo told him not to look back. Jo & Ian were the once-in-a-lifetime chance bc Ian was finally reaching for a love that made him feel chosen instead of kept. Ian said he never really had an ex bc he’d never truly been in a rship before. He wanted a label. He wanted to be chosen openly. __ kept him hidden bc claiming Ian fully would’ve threatened the power he valued more. Jo never moved like that. Jo wanted Ian fully, proudly & without shame. *Insert the dog’s shocked face when Jo declared himself Ian’s boyfriend lol.* The intimacy argument makes the projection even clearer. Ppl isolate the JoIan scene where Jo finishes on Ian & treat it like the whole truth of Jo’s character while stripping away what the scene was built on. Ian had already told Jo he wasn’t sleeping with other people bc he knew Jo didn’t like it & Jo responded by satisfying the desire Ian had been holding back. The scene follows Ian’s pleasure & intensity. It doesn’t show Jo ignoring Ian through pain, sickness or refusal. Jo’s larger dynamic with Ian supports that too. When Ian said he didn’t feel well & couldn’t have sex, Jo accepted it. __’s scenes show the opposite pattern. Ian said he felt sick & __ still pushed for sex. Ian said it hurt & his pain got dismissed. Ian’s discomfort keeps getting folded into the excuse that this was just how they were, as if familiarity gives someone more right to ignore his body. Even the author didn’t frame Jo or __ as the textbook r*pe case. That was David Kim. Jo & __ both show obsession & possession but Jo’s intensity wasn’t built to keep Ian suffering. Jo wanted Ian openly. __ kept Ian through secrecy, guilt, power, debt & access to his body even when Ian was uncomfortable.

The rape apologist showing up again with their flawless logic. Ian never withdrew his consent? Tell me how smut panels blinded you without telling me so. 15 years of experience of knowing eachother's boundary? That's 15 years of TJ raping Ian knowingly and Ian sucking it up because of his guilt and knowing his rapist wouldn't let up until it's done. Oh but Ian's trauma and guilt must be non existent to serve your fantasy of an equal and consensual relationship, so I guess it's natural you don't remember that. Let me talk about something you definitely remember, TJ Ian's very first time. Your fav knew Ian was suffering from withdrawal, thus not in the right state of mind to give consent, yet still chose to fuck him. Now tell me dear gp who holds a master in what constitutes as consent, how is this not rape? It's rape and their 15 years of relationship started with rape. Also, did you forget it was TJ Stans who, unprovoked, kept harping about how Jo raped Ian by cumming on him after he passed out from sex? Now you suddenly know the difference between sexual assaults and rape because you are confronted with how TJ assaulted and raped Ian for 15 years? Everything Jo does that is remotely rough, it's violent sex, rape and assault, yet when TJ does it and more, it's just passionate sex and just pushing while knowing eachother's boundary? Your double standards and hypocrisy are as clear as day.

One JoIan scene can’t override years of actions against Ian just bc those years make the endgame look worse. Discomfort has to matter even when it makes the endgame look bad. Ian’s body doesn’t become less his bc __ had longer access to it. Ian spent so much of the story being used, degraded or spoken about like his body & dignity were disposable. David Kim r*ped him. Jamie degraded him. Gang members disrespected him. __ watched that world reduce Ian for years bc Ian staying beneath it still served him. Jo did the opposite. He raised a gun in Ian’s defense more than once & tried again before Ian redirected the bullet to keep Jo from becoming a killer. Turning Jo into the worst person in Ian’s story ignores that Jo was one of the only people who ever treated Ian’s dignity like something worth protecting (without some ulterior motive, right from the start). The “Jo called Ian broken” argument is laughable. Ian already believed that about himself & kept proving it through the way he ran, hurt & punished himself. Jo named the wound bc Ian was treating him cruelly while Jo was still trying to understand him. Jo didn’t use Ian’s brokenness to keep him trapped. He loved him without gaining anything from it. Jo & Ian were never written like Ian had no agency. Ian sought him out. Ian let him close. Ian kissed him, provoked him, held onto him & kept looking for reasons to stay near him even when he was afraid of what his life would do to Jo. Jo asked, listened, communicated & offered to give up everything without making that love another burden Ian had to carry. He loved Ian in a way that made Ian feel seen instead of owned. So when ppl run into JoIan spaces to call Jo controlling, abusive or irrelevant, it reads like deflection. They’re taking the harm attached to __’s dynamic & trying to paste it onto Jo bc Jo’s existence makes the difference too obvious. Jo treated Ian like a person to know, love, protect & release. __ treated Ian like someone to keep close without ever fully choosing him. Jo always put Ian first. Jo is the true lover in this story. Jo didn’t ruin what Ian had with __. Ian had already called it withered. Jo’s presence just made the difference impossible to hide. He showed what Ian looked like when love gave him a choice instead of another obligation. If defending the endgame requires turning that into the threat, then the argument’s already telling on itself.

Remember my friend TJ raping Ian is on top of the list. Glad to know you also agree TJ is ugly inside out!

You are showing your true colours as a rape apologist. Let me quote your friend K: "RAPE IS RAPE. There is no justification for rape." Is being awake and saying no consensual to you? Is getting gagged in the mouth when telling your partner to slow down, take it out, it hurts, thinking is fucked up consensual to you? Ian was CONSCIOUSLY saying no and withdrawing his consent and what did TJ do every single time? Call Ian a baby, shove it in harder, gag Ian's mouth with a finger that just touched a public toilet to shut him up. That's just having sex to you? Is consciousness the only requirement to give consent in your book? Do you know what coercive rape is? Like you said they had 15 years of situationship, that's 15 years of sexual assaults and coercive rape done to Ian by TJ. If Jo assaulted Ian, then TJ also assaulted Ian and for 15 long years. Now are you going to admit TJ also raped Ian, pretentious snob?

／ #原神KFCコラボ 販売開始まであと2日❗ ＼ KFCネットオーダーにて事前予約受付中！ アナ( @anna_drw01 )様から お祝いイラストをいただきました✨ #ケンタッキー #KFC #原神 #原神KFCコラボ #コードネームK

I like how you deliberately ignore the rest. As you loudly said Jo cummed on Ian's face so he raped Ian, so why don't you also call out TJ for raping Ian all the time when Ian is consciously saying no and rejecting TJ? Or can we take the fact that you are not commenting on it when confronted as completely agreeing with TJ being a rapist? Then welcome to the TJ hater club my friend! Glad you also acknowledge what an abusive rapist TJ is 🫶

Them about Jo cumming on Ian who passed out from consensual sex: RAPEEEE Them to TJ fucking Ian when he didn't want to or when he clearly said no, that hurts, this is fucked up etc, then shutting Ian up to stop his complaints: just passionate love making nothing to see here. Do you see the double standard here? Pretentious much? Dragging Jo for his coming on Ian's face ain't gonna save your shitty ML honey. Both MLs sexually assaulted Ian and TJ did to Ian way worse and for much longer than Jo. It just goes to show Wetsand is just a trashy rape manhwa, especially TJIan, their dynamic and sex scenes are all trashy romanticized rape.

Some times I think a rite of passage for being a Jo or JoIan fan in the Wetsand fandom is to be jumped on by #them because we dare to like Jo or dislike the other one, argue for the CP we like, get tired of racists remarks and insulting takes, mute and block, then randomly find out you are also blocked by one of #them even though there was no prior interaction. If you reach that point, then you made it as a bonafide JoIan and just know that you have great tastes

TJ and everything related to him has all the hallmarks of bad writing. There's the classic tell-don't-show like how TJ is supposedly a great gangster yet he did nothing but talk, intimidate some random NPC, sleep with women, and still basically a low level grunt throughout the whole series. His gang plot is full of plot holes and illogical resolutions like this whole wedding massacre arc she's trying so hard to fix. The big bosses were basically retired Asian parents association because all they did was being homophobic, gossiping, attending a funeral and going to a wedding. Then the lights at the wedding full of supposedly important gangsters turned off and oops everyone is dead now. Then there's Chiwoon, the ever useful dues ex machina showing up only when the plot needs to push TJ or TJ Ian agenda, doing all the gang biddings for TJ, taking unsolicited pictures of Ian for TJ to caress, and having a GPS on Ian that only worked when Ian went to meet Jo at a random gas station in the middle of the night and not when he was being assaulted in his apartment or killing a man. Even TJ's emotional and core romance plot lines were snubbed so badly, like wdym Chiwoon had to hand-feed TJ the epiphany that Ian mattered, all the emotional baggage he had with Ian gone with a 2 years time skip and the fucker just tattooed yw aka "years wasted" on his body as the answer to his doormat saying ily. If you don't like TJ's aesthetic, everything about and surrounds him becomes so dumb and inexcusably bad.

So we finally met Venus

I wrote charity so many times and it still could not get through that thick head of yours seeing how you are still barking nonsense at me. Does TJ own the colour yellow? If kindergarten kids are asked to draw something that is yellow, 9 out of 10 would draw the sun, then the remaining 1 kid is you because you would draw TJ's scarface 😂😂😂 And yes the project owner is 10 times the better person who used their own money to spread positivity for something they love, while donating more of their own money for good cause. You and all those unemployed TJ stans participating in and justifying this hate campaign trying to sabotage a charity project over 2D pixels are all pieces of 💩 who are just jealous and insecure AF

Let's get the story straight. 1. The intention was always to celebrate Jo and Ian journey with moments from their relationship and their last panels. TJ stans were the delusional ones sticking their nose in, claiming the use of yellow is exclusively for TJ, and that using Ian's last panel in the story is distorting the narrative, when it was never about TJ nor TJ Ian in the first place. 2. They made it clear they always intented to donate to children's cancer treatment and wanted to announce this a few days later, but TJ stans spreading misinformation again caused them to announce it a mere 3 hours after the original announcement post. 3. What did TJ stans do after finding out that the project is raising money for children with cancer mere hours later? Completely ignored that, still zoned in on the LED design and accusing the publisher of unfairness for rejecting another TJ stans' online video ads, which is completely different type of project. For days following they harassed the project owner and mass emailed Do7 to the point an official response had to be made. 4. Why are you capping 'donate a part' for? This is a SELF FUNDED NON PROFIT project and they are using their own money to pay for the LED. They don't even accept any external donations but donating extra of their own money to a cancer fund. No money is being made here for you to be insinuating that they are syphoning donation money. Lastly, regardless of when the charity announcement was made, it is still a project with good intentions and for charity, yet to this day and even in the Do7 announcement post, TJ stans are still making it about themselves, distorting the truth, valuing fictional discourse over helping real life children with cancer. You and those TJ stans' participating in this hate campaign are insidious for trying to sabotage a self funded charity project for 2D pixels. The fact that you are here accusing us of lying and making excuses about how the charity announcement post came after proves that you know this is fucked up.

To summarise the situation 1. A JoIan fan self financed a LED project featuring Jo and Ian past moments and their final panels in the series, advertised it on X to raise money for children with cancer 2. TJ stans misunderstood the intention, threw a fit on X claiming the design with bright yellow is apparently owned by TJ and using Ian's last panel in the series is misrepresenting the story 3. TJ fans got salty that in the past one of them got rejected by Do7 for editing original panels and using it in online videos 4. TJ fans as per usual mass emailing Do7 to demand answers and sabotage a charity project already approved 5. Do7 got tired of this bs and had to issue an official response, directly mentioning that the use of official images for billboards is permitted and excessive editing for online videos is not permitted (the shades I can't 😂😂😂) 6. TJ stans still mad that the copyright owner is doing what they are entitled and paid to do on behalf of the author, which is managing and promoting the IP they owned how they see fit <- we are here All this tantrum over a charity project where they are not even the target audience and could have just chosen to scroll through. It just shows how entitled, childish and especially insecure they are.