Don't blame me for your shitty candidates that can't win clear majorities despite all the structural and financial advantages they have. For most of this century, elections have been close and control of the federal government has gone back and forth among the Democrats and Republicans because both parties offer less and less to fewer and fewer voters.
Trump is not Hitler and Harris is not Madame Mao, but they are incredibly mediocre and uncompelling. Neither has a compelling vision for America that does not revolve around spending gobs and gobs more money; intervening in the wars they prefer; building up the businesses they like; fucking over the people they don't like; propping up insolvent and unjust entitlement programs that steal from the young and poor and give to the old and the rich; and fueling culture wars by lying about immigrants eating cats, threatening to pull licenses on TV stations, colluding with social media and legacy media, and forcing mandates on this or that.
Dems and Reps, who are losing market share with every passing year, exist only to fight over the dwindling number of dead-enders in their increasingly awful tribes.
Either party could have easily won my vote by seriously talking about cutting the size, scope, and spending of govt rather than giving away even more money we can't afford; unequivocally supporting free speech in all its expressions; slashing business regulations (including existing and future tariffs); maximizing individual lifestyle freedom; and promoting more legal immigration.
I'm happy to have written in
@LPNational @ChaseForLiberty, whose platform most closely resembles the government I want to live under. He has no chance of winning of course, but every ballot for him is a marker on the eventual future of smaller, leaner, more effective government that will come when our overblown, unaffordable, and ruefully incompetent government finally collapses under its own weight.