"Upper Caste Or Earning Rs 80 Lakh": Daughter Of IPS Officer Sets Groom Criteria, Sparks Debate ndtv.com/feature/upper-caste…

ABORTION doesn't undo Rape, ADDS ADDITIONAL TRAUMA to female & creates an ADDITIONAL VICTIM- the BABY. Crimes of Man/ Poor Sexual Choices of Female shouldnt become death sentence for unborn child. This is SC sanctioned Murder & violation of 31 week VIABLE Baby's Right to Life.

🚨"When there is a pregnancy due to rape, there should not be time limit. Law needs to be organic and in sync with evolving times," said the Supreme Court of India The court made the observation while hearing a case on the termination of a 31-week pregnancy of a 15-year-old rape survivor, stressing the need to respect individual choice

This 37-year-old female lawyer was arrested for being involved in the theft of two iPhones. She was ordered to stop, but she did not comply and displayed an aggressive attitude. This is how women in crime must be dealt with.

Serving army officer argues own divorce case before Supreme Court: Wife: I am not here against divorce (divorce has already been granted). I am challenging the remarks and findings on cruelty and desertion made against me by the family court and high court. They may be expunged. Husband: I had to fight 10 years to get my parents’ name out, my sister’s name out and my name out from the allegations she had made against me and now she wants that they be omitted. Please see the allegations which were put on me. First allegation, trying to convert her religion, trying to murder her, sexual determination and gender bias, pressurising her to terminate pregnancy, harassment for dowry, demanding dowry, stalking, threatening with weapon… I had to fight 10 years to get my name cleared from this. Till date they have taken out about 57 lakhs from me. Court: they have taken out means what? It’s according to the family court’s order. Husband: in another matter they have to return 11.7 lakhs to me. Court: that’s a different matter, you have got recourse to the courts for that. Husband: the maintenance which they have taken from me is on a false affidavit. They have misled the family court. She has filed two contradicting affidavits. Court: contradicting doesn’t mean that it’s false. Court: What were the allegations in the divorce suit? Wife: cruelty in terms of not staying with him in his place of work, desertion that I did not go with my daughter to his house and instead I went to my parents’ house. I wanted to open my dental clinic in Ahmedabad has been used against me. Saying that I don’t want to join my husband in his place of work, knowing that he’s an army man. Court: yes, wife having own work, there’s nothing wrong with that. Court to husband: are you standing the risk of getting this judgement of high court reversed? [the judgement which had granted divorce based on wife’s cruelty]. We don’t think a single allegation in your petition amounts to cruelty, if you seek our opinion. Do you want to take that risk? Husband: the charges that were put on me… Court: let things be over. Forget about the past and move on. That’s more advisable for you. Husband: it took me 10 years to get my name cleared from the charges which she had put against me. Court: you also dragged her here till Supreme Court. (The husband has filed a perjury case against the wife for the alleged contradictory affidavits) The court ultimately reserved its order in the case.