Aerospace Engineer turned struggling Lawyer. Interested in Civil, Consti, Service & Arbitration Law. Practicing before J&K&L High Court. Alumnus@FacultyofLawDU

Joined August 2010
653 Photos and videos
Most advocates become pro bono advocates involuntarily.
Heartiest congratulations to Advocate Vikash Saraf on becoming a Pro Bono Advocate. linkedin.com/posts/vikash-an…
1
72
میم -M Syed retweeted
In a first, Kashmiri woman lawyer among 11 recommended by Collegium for elevation to J&K High Court Read here: barandbench.com/news/in-a-fi…
1
6
23
2,274
Asim Munir in Trump voice: Iran- US - very, very close to nuclear. Nobody closer. Planes and drones going down, things happening… bad things. Very bad things.. And I said, ‘Stop.’ Just like that. They stopped. Nobody talks about it, but I stopped it.
1
66
Total disaster avoided. Could have been nuclear- Could’ve been millions. Maybe more. Incredible job, frankly…
48
میم -M Syed retweeted
Khawar Khan Achakzai problematizes the historical figure of Sikandar Shahmiri—notoriously known as Sikandar Butshikan, “the idol breaker”—by engaging with a variety of historical texts, previously unaccessed documentary and archaeological evidence. inversejournal.com/2026/04/0…
2
14
45
8,971
میم -M Syed retweeted
1. Again, the ancestors of Ayatollah Khomeini (founder of the Iranian Revolution) were not from Awadh. The family had arrived in Kashmir in the 18th century from Iran, and after two generations in Srinagar, left around 1830 following a riot in the city. theprint.in/opinion/india-ha…
6
57
221
16,945
میم -M Syed retweeted
إِنَّ اللَّهَ اشْتَرَىٰ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ أَنفُسَهُمْ وَأَمْوَالَهُم بِأَنَّ لَهُمُ الْجَنَّةَ شهادت مبارک
134
1,005
8,087
159,745
میم -M Syed retweeted
Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled!
7,391
74,524
156,132
Earthquake ?
318
The order is constitutionally evasive and reflects the disturbing trend of constitutional retreat. It does not sufficiently protect personal liberty against prolonged incarceration. Through this judgement what one sees is that in this country liberty is fractured…
72
…and equality before law is a just a rhetorical construct. The constitutional promise of personal liberty is subordinated to untested prosecutorial narratives and incarceration has become the norm and release the exception.
56
میم -M Syed retweeted
6 Nov 2025
"The only thing permanent in the universe is impermanence...I would like to look at transfers in the words of #RahatIndori...'जो आज साहिब-ए-मसनद है कल नही होंगे, किरायेदार है ज़ाती मकान थोड़ी है।'..." : said Justice Atul Sreedharan in his Farewell ceremony at #MadhyaPradeshHC.
13
133
551
28,909
Every other day such PSA are quashed by the High Court . Don’t understand the hype…
PSA detention of Pulwama youth, represented by twin sons of CM Omar Abdullah quashed by High Court @zamirabdullah12 thekashmirtoday.com/2025/11/…
101
Guilt and tear free maybe, but the guy eating it was definitely tear-full..
Tear and Guilt free
125
The person involved in the recent “off-roading controversy” has always had problematic takes in the past as well.
1
1
115
The Sonam Wangchuk case isn’t about “bail jurisprudence” at all. It’s a preventive detention under the NSA. Bail arises in criminal prosecutions. Preventive detention is not penal, & challenged for violation of Art.21 & 22. An Article 32 petition here questions its legality.
Thoughts on Sonam Wangchuk bail issue: Bail jurisprudence in India is grounded in Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before law. Consequently, all individuals seeking bail are bound to follow the legal procedure prescribed by law. No person, irrespective of their perceived social or political stature, can claim a special route to justice by bypassing the hierarchy of courts. Filing directly before the Supreme Court, except in cases of manifest constitutional urgency, undermines both judicial discipline and the principle of equality and clogs the Court’s docket with matters that ought to be addressed first by the competent lower forums.
1
1
142
Therefore, approaching the SC is a better option, though I personally, always would prefer moving the High Court first. However, detention matters in High Courts (particularly this one) are not given the kind of urgency or consistency they deserve.
38
A small factual correction to Dr. @DrAMSinghvi’s otherwise delightful tweet - Lord Denning never dodged a shoe and the “upright judge” quip was from a story about C.J. Richardson, where a brickbat was thrown at him…
Having tweeted abt the shoe incident earlier, I am not at all surprised by the (non) reaction of #CJI. His equanimity &calm in diverse tension generating situations has been seen &experienced by most of the #Bar. In a lighter vein, let me recount an anecdote written by the legendary Lord #Denning in one of his books abt a shoe hurled at him which missed him but hit the top tip of his chair since he was sitting a little slumped down. Lord #Denning immly sat up and remarked: “Thank God I am not always an upright judge”. #GavaiJ #SC
1
97
Although Lord Denning himself did once endure books thrown at him and his companion judges. The story goes like this: A woman argued in person and, when her application was refused she picked up and threw one large law book, then another at the judges.
1
30
Both times the judges, Lord Denning among them took no notice. As she left she said: “I congratulate your Lordships on your coolness under fire.”
25