🧵 50 Days of Transparency — Bybit Case #21682711
50 days, many emails, slow replies — excuses,no answers
A close-by order was triggered; alert confirmed it,but it never executed and later vanished from records — a verified system bug proven by multiple tests
@Bybit_Official
Financial freedom starts with transparency.
My case (#21682711) has been pending for 70 days with a verified system bug.
Please resolve real issues before promoting deposits.”
“Transparency isn’t optional.
A verified malfunction and missing audit logs cannot be ignored.
SCA is actively following up — yet Bybit remains silent.
65 days, still waiting.
Case #21682711”
Day 24 — More than 65 days with no response.
A verified trading malfunction, missing audit logs, and an unexecuted Close-By order… yet still no clear answer.
Transparency shouldn't take this long.
Case #21682711
#Bybit#TransparencyMatters#CryptoJustice@Bybit_Official
أدعم جهود هيئة الأوراق المالية والسلع في تعزيز الحماية والشفافية للمستثمرين.
أتمنى أن تنظر الهيئة أيضاً في القضايا التقنية العالقة لدى بعض المنصات، ومنها قضيتي رقم 21682711.
.
للاطلاع على قائمة التحذيرات يرجى زيارة الرابط sca.gov.ae (الصفحة الرئيسية> البيانات المفتوحة >التحذيرات)
To access investor alerts, please visit sca.gov.ae (On the homepage, go to “Open Data” and select “Warnings”).
Day 23 — Still no clarification.
My Close-By Limit order triggered, alert confirmed it
but it didn’t execute and later vanished from all Bybit records.
This isn’t a small bug — it’s a transparency issue
Still waiting for a real explanation
#Transparency#Crypto@Bybit_Official
🧵 50 Days of Transparency — Bybit Case #21682711
50 days, many emails, slow replies — excuses,no answers
A close-by order was triggered; alert confirmed it,but it never executed and later vanished from records — a verified system bug proven by multiple tests
@Bybit_Official
“All the evidence is public. The Close-By Limit order was triggered and then disappeared from records — multiple tests confirmed the same bug. Still no explanation from Bybit after 60 days.”
Imagine if exchanges adopted immutable on-chain order proofs —
my Close-By order in Case #21682711 would never have “disappeared.”
Transparency isn’t optional.
Day 52 — Bybit Case #21682711
A Close-By Limit was placed
Price hit (even passed) the target — alert sound triggered
but the position stayed open and the Close-By order vanished from all records
I proved the bug with multiple test videos
52 days,still no answer
@Bybit_Official
🧵 50 Days of Transparency — Bybit Case #21682711
50 days, many emails, slow replies — excuses,no answers
A close-by order was triggered; alert confirmed it,but it never executed and later vanished from records — a verified system bug proven by multiple tests
@Bybit_Official
🧵 50 Days of Transparency — Bybit Case #21682711
50 days, many emails, slow replies — excuses,no answers
A close-by order was triggered; alert confirmed it,but it never executed and later vanished from records — a verified system bug proven by multiple tests
@Bybit_Official
Public Accountability Post
> Transparency in crypto must mean verifiable records.
A system that deletes order history on its own is not a trading platform — it’s a black box.
#Bybit#Accountability#CryptoRegulation
Day 20 — Case Closed Without Evidence
After 50 days, Bybit closed my case (#21682711) with no proof —
no audit logs, no Close-By records, nothing.
Closing a case isn’t transparency.
Real transparency means showing records, not hiding them.
🔗 Day 20: bit.ly/BybitDay20
Phase 5 — 50 Days Later
> 50 days passed. Every email archived. Every evidence timestamped.
Still no audit logs shared.
Transparency is not about PR tweets; it’s about records that exist.
Case #21682711 remains open — and unanswered.
Phase 4 (continued)
After weeks of silence, delays, and repeated excuses, Bybit responded only with automated messages:
“Your case is under review.”
No audit trail, no transparency — just time.
🔗 Day 18: bit.ly/BybitDay18