Hire Top-Notch Software Developers | For enterprises that want to delight their customers | Connect: linktr.ee/softaims

Joined September 2020
43 Photos and videos
Developers which domain makes a startup feel more legit? 1) .ai 2) .com 3) .io 4) .dev 5) .app 6) .sh 7) .cloud
51
Whats changed in React Native in 2026: React Native's biggest historical weakness was its "bridge," an asynchronous communication layer between JavaScript and native code that introduced latency on every interaction.
1
50
Hermes engine: React Native's default JavaScript engine precompiles JavaScript into bytecode, significantly reducing cold-start times and memory usage.
1
51
Mobile app has become the default. 7.3B smartphone users. 181B app downloads expected in 2026. Users spend ~90% of mobile time inside apps. If you’re planning to build a mobile app, read this 👇
1
1
46
Where most apps go wrong: • No clear user problem • Overcomplicated features • Poor user experience • No launch or growth strategy A simple product that solves one problem will always win.
1
34
Mobile app development isn’t just coding. It’s strategy, execution, and continuous iteration. If you’re planning to build one, this guide covers everything step-by-step: Read more here: softaims.com/blog/app-store-…

36
Most teams pick Flutter or React Native based on trends. That’s how they lose months. In 2026, the gap isn’t "which is better?" It’s which mistake is more expensive for YOU. Here’s the breakdown founders & CTOs actually need 👇
1
1
85
Simple decision framework: Choose React Native if: • You already use React • You need to hire fast • Time-to-market is critical Choose Flutter if: • UI consistency matters • You’re starting fresh • You want tighter control over UX
1
72
Full breakdown (benchmarks salaries hiring strategy): softaims.com/blog/react-nati…

42
Softaims retweeted
26 Mar 2025
Last week I told a founder: DON'T hire us yet. Spend $79 first on validation before $50K on building it. 79 dollars. 500 outreach messages. 5 calls. 6 potential paying customers. You can validate your sartup idea with either $79 OR 1 hour of daily effort. I tell this to every founder who wants to build MVP with us. Here's the simple playbook that's saved our clients $680K in wasted development: →  If you have $79: Buy a LinkedIn automation tool and set up a simple 2-line outreach sequence. → If you don't have $79: Spend 1 hour daily sending 20-30 manual connection requests/messages. → Your target: 500 people who EXACTLY match your ICP. → Your message: "I'm building [specific solution for specific problem]. Can I show you what I'm working on and get your feedback?" → Book 10-20 calls (this is typical from 500 outreach messages). →  DON'T build anything yet. Just LISTEN. One founder I worked with had $50K ready to build his product. I said: "Put that $50K away. Spend $79 on LinkedIn automation instead." After 12 calls, he completely changed his core feature set. After 15 calls, he changed his pricing model. After 19 calls, he had 4 people ready to pay him once the product was built. - Total cost: $79 (or would have been $0 if he did manual outreach) - Time invested: 3 weeks - Result: Product that customers actually wanted This is NOT about being dramatic. This is simple math: • Cost of building the wrong product: $30K-$60K • Cost of validating first: $79 (or just your time) Every single successful founder we've worked with did this validation BEFORE building. The ones who didn't? They built beautiful products nobody wanted. Your 1 hour daily LinkedIn effort will teach you more about your market than any expert ever could. - If you're a founder with an idea, don't call a dev shop yet. - Call 10-20 potential customers first. - It will be the best investment of time you ever make. PS: Want help turning customer feedback into a buildable MVP? Our dev shop specializes in helping founders build what customers actually want - not what founders initially think they want.
1
1
11
452
Softaims retweeted
21 Mar 2025
STOP hiring full-time DevOps. STOP building in-house. STOP paying monthly retainers. Here's the approach #1. THE ARCHITECT SPRINT (3-5 days) • Hire a $200 /hr Expert AWS Solutions Architect • Pay them to design an AUTOMATED infrastructure • Have them document everything obsessively • THIS IS WHERE 90% OF YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE VALUE LIVES #2. THE BUILDER WEEK (5-7 days) • Hire a $50-75/hr BUILDER to implement the architect's exact specs • No creative decisions, pure implementation • Rigorous testing and documentation • Never mix architects with builders (different skillsets) #3. THE MAINTENANCE TRAP (avoid at all costs) • REFUSE monthly retainers • Set up AWS Lambda functions for 98% of maintenance tasks • Create CloudWatch alerts that trigger automated fixes • Only pay for expertise when something actually breaks One AWS partner told me: "We never tell clients this, but the ideal AWS setup should be 'set and forget' with maybe 4-6 hours of expert time quarterly." Here's the exact script I now use when hiring AWS talent: "I need a serverless-first, automation-heavy AWS architecture designed in 3 days that will run with zero human intervention for 3 months. After your design is complete, I'll hire a separate person to implement it. Your design must include CloudFormation templates, automated scaling policies, and self-healing capabilities." Stop treating cloud infrastructure like it needs constant attention. The best infrastructure is the one you forget exists.
2
2
6
636