22 y/o. learning about ai agents and experimenting!

Joined November 2023
846 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
26 Nov 2025
Perplexity just launched persistent memory across sessions: the feature users begged for, but also the one that makes everyone nervous. The idea: it remembers your preferences, interests, and past convos so you stop re-explaining yourself. You can view/delete memories in settings, but some users opened theirs and found a long list of inferred habits they never explicitly shared. Useful? Yes. Creepy? Also yes. What research says: Memory-augmented LLMs aren't new. Systems like Mem0 show ~26% better accuracy and 90% token savings with good memory design. But the privacy trade-offs: aggregated memories can reveal sensitive stuff users didn't mean to expose. Perplexity's Team: Encrypted, avoidable (incognito mode exists), but deleted memories linger in logs for ~30 days and feed model training unless you opt out. Do you turn memory ON or keep it OFF?
We've been testing Memory (short-term and long-term) on Perplexity for a while. The results are great, and we are rolling it out widely. You can ask personalized questions, questions about past chats, and use any model or search mode with personal context (both apps and web).
6
9
177
21,664
Jun 13
Just stumbled on this open-source tool called Agent-Reach and honestly, it’s pretty cool. This thing basically lets the agent browse and read stuff directly from those platforms without needing any API keys or paying for anything. Zero cost!!
Jun 13
your agent can search Twitter, Reddit, and GitHub for free - zero API keys, zero billing 😳 agent-reach is trending on github with 23K stars. it lets your AI agent read Twitter posts, browse Reddit threads, search GitHub repos, watch YouTube videos - all without paying for a single API subscription what your agent accesses for $0: - Twitter/X posts, profiles, and search - Reddit threads and comments - YouTube videos, metadata, and search - GitHub repos, issues, and profiles - 10 more platforms - all in one pip install what this replaces: - Twitter API: $100/mo for basic access - Reddit API: rate-limited free tier, expensive at scale - YouTube API: quota limits, pay for more - GitHub API: generous but still rate-limited why this matters: - most AI agents are blind to the internet because APIs cost money - this gives any agent real-time web access at zero marginal cost - perfect for research agents, content radar, competitive intel, market analysis how to set up (2 min): > pip install agent-reach > run: agent-reach doctor > connect it to your agent as a tool > done - your agent can now search the internet for free important: - uses direct parsing, not official APIs - no keys needed - works with claude code, cursor, aider, langchain, any agent framework - MIT licensed, fully open source - not for production web scraping at scale - use for agentic research and prototyping - 23K stars and trending - community vetted let your agent browse Twitter, Reddit, and GitHub for $0 while everyone else is paying $100 /mo for API access bookmark this before payying for extra api ↓ repo in comment
1
3
132
Jun 13
It runs in the terminal, super simple to install, and there’s even a quick “doctor” command that checks if everything’s working. You can feed it cookies for sites that need login, and it plays nice with stuff like Claude, Cursor, or LangChain. For anyone who builds agents or does a lot of online digging, this removes a real headache!
1
1
51
Jun 13
You can be one of the best computer vision guys in the world. You can help to build this model. But you're not an American!! That's the issue. FUNNY.
JUST IN: Andrej Karpathy, a top AI scientist at Anthropic, is reportedly barred from accessing the company’s most advanced AI model because he is not a U.S. citizen.
2
42
Jun 13
Saw this today and it honestly blew my mind a bit. This 25 year old housewife in Chennai is making ₹250 an hour just by wearing a small camera on her head while doing normal daily stuff: making coffee, cutting fruit, folding clothes, whatever.

1
2
98
Jun 13
She’s literally living her regular life and companies are paying her to record it all in first-person view so AI can train humanoid robots to do these same everyday tasks better. It’s such a simple idea, but kind of wild
2
2
28
Jun 13
when you think about it. On one hand, it’s giving regular people (especially homemakers) an easy way to earn from home without any fancy skills. On the other, it’s a reminder of how fast this AI/Robotics is moving!
1
9
Jun 10
Most people confuse pattern matching with creativity. it's not the same thing. (by Research) Studies show commercial LLMs produce highly similar creative outputs, lacking population level diversity compared to humans. There's also a growing concern about AI's "flattening effect" AI may diminish diversity, style and authenticity in human creativity.
Jun 10
i used to say programming was creative work except LLMs are fine at programming and are literal 0s for more obviously creative work i think we mistook enumerating a lot of possibilities and picking one for being creative
1
1
4
55
"The data center is coming to your laptop." Just watched @AravindSrinivas interview Cloud-only AI is burning too much cash on tokens so for fix: Hybrid Agentic Inference. > Local chips handle your private data & easy tasks > Cloud frontier models handle the heavy lifting > Perplexity OS orchestrates it all in real-time Cheaper. Faster. Totally private.
3
76
Just saw this post and it honestly clicked something for me about where AI agents are heading right now. Peter Steinberger tweeted: stop sitting there prompting coding agents (or any agents) step by step like you did last year. Instead, start designing “loops” that let the agents keep prompting and correcting themselves
what is agent looping for the last two years we prompted agents one task at a time. that is starting to change instead of asking an agent to build the landing page and then driving every step yourself, you set up a loop that handles discovery, planning, the work, checking, and iterating until the goal is met looping is a setup you build. almost any agent harness can run it, it just depends on how you wire it up at its simplest, looping is one agent working on itself: > researches > drafts > checks the draft against a goal > fixes what is weak > runs that cycle again until the work clears the requirements you are not prompting each step anymore. the agent repeats the cycle for you the bigger version is a fleet looping. you give an orchestrator agent a goal, it breaks the goal into pieces, hands each piece to a specialist agent, and those specialists hand smaller jobs to their own subagents the whole tree keeps looping through discovery, planning, execution, and verification until the goal is met one agent looping is like a person redoing their own draft. a fleet looping is a whole team running a project end-to-end you create a goal, and the system runs the loop until it finishes within the reqs you set open and closed looping: OPEN LOOPING is exploratory. it still has conditions and a goal, but you give the agent or the fleet a wide space to move in. it can try different paths, discover things, build something you did not fully spec out this is the exciting end, it is what Peter and others are doing, and tbh it is where I want to spend more time the catch is cost, an open loop with real room to explore burns an insane amount of tokens. for the 90 percent of people without an unlimited budget it is not runnable yet, and pointed at projects with a loose standard it turns into a slop machine CLOSED LOOPING is bounded. a human designs the end-to-end path first: > clear goal > defined steps > an eval at each step > a point where it stops or hands back to you (and feeds back performance data) the agents still loop, but inside framework you built. it gets better every run because each pass feeds the next, and it runs on a normal budget because the path is tight. for most marketing work, closed is the one that pays off today. > the orchestrator owns the goal > the specialists own the steps > the subagents do the narrow work > an eval gate make sure its not slop
1
2
144
I’ve been messing around with agents a bit and this shift makes total sense. For the longest time we were doing one shot prompts and then fixing everything manually. Now people are building these self-correcting systems that actually run end to end.
1
1
14
It’s blowing up the last couple days because Peter Steinberger posted this as a reminder about it and it hit a nerve everyone building stuff is suddenly sharing their own loop setups, what’s working, what’s still expensive or messy.
1
18
Multiple of this kind of post I saw today! Yes, they are providing, but these models are very, very slow and you’ll be frustrated.
🤯 kadang gue ngerasa apa ini masih illegal ya. NVIDIA ternyata ngasih akses ke 120 model AI gratis selama 1 tahun penuh. 💳 Tanpa kartu kredit 💸 Tanpa pembayaran 🔑 Cukup ambil API key gratis Yang bikin makin menarik, Hermes Studio sudah mendukung NVIDIA secara bawaan. Jadi setup-nya cuma butuh beberapa menit. ⚡ Yang didapat: 🚀 120 model AI ⚡ Hingga 40 request per menit 📅 Gratis selama 1 tahun penuh Sementara banyak orang masih keluar biaya bulanan buat API AI... Program ini justru lewat begitu saja tanpa banyak yang sadar. Buat yang suka eksperimen dengan agent, workflow, atau automasi AI, ini salah satu cara termurah buat mulai tanpa harus khawatir tagihan token di akhir bulan. 😳 Kadang tools paling menarik bukan yang paling viral. Tapi yang diam-diam sudah tersedia dan hampir nggak ada yang memanfaatkannya. 🔥 📌 Simpan dulu. Kemungkinan banyak orang baru akan sadar soal ini beberapa bulan dari sekarang. 🚀
1
29
Just saw this from Andrej Karpathy and it hit hard. We all keep scrolling through these quick “learn AI in 10 minutes” or “master Python while brushing your teeth” videos. They feel good in the moment- entertaining, easy and you walk away thinking you did something productive.
🎯 Andrej Karpathy on how to learn.
1
5
109
rereading docs and fixing your own mistakes. The convenience is addictive but the retention is almost zero. I’m trying to remind myself: if I’m learning just to feel productive, I’m probably not learning.
1
2
33
If I’m willing to get uncomfortable and put in the messy work, that’s when things actually stick.
1
21
May 31
Just came across this old post between Steve Yegge and Demis Hassabis from a couple months back. Yegge basically said real AI adoption means engineers are burning millions of tokens a day (like at Anthropic levels) and Google wasn’t there yet. Demis called it nonsense and
Ok now that tokenmaxxing is starting to get its fair share of criticism properly.... imagine reading this exchange all over again. 😅 "you are not a good engineering company unless you can convince me that your engineers are burning infinite tokens"
2
5
131
May 31
clickbait. Fast forward to today companies are quietly killing their internal AI leaderboards because “tokenmaxxing” became a thing. People gaming the system with pointless tasks just to rack up numbers, burning cash with zero real output. Amazon and others are pulling back.
1
3
48
May 31
It’s funny how the hype around “more tokens means better engineering” is already showing cracks.
1
2
27