Switzerland has decided it would be opting out of participating in the Copernicus programme for the next cycle (2028-2034). This follows their previous decision in 2024 to not participate in the current cycle.
Why? Copernicus has an open-data policy and so Switzerland can access almost all of the data. But, it won't be able to take advantage of membership benefits like receiving real-time data, activating Copernicus services (in case of emergencies) and influencing the direction of the programme.
What's worth watching is the bigger question this raises: the financial sustainability of open data.
Copernicus is only getting more expensive from here: new Sentinel missions, more data to process and more investment in storage and dissemination.
All of it will be funded by the countries in Copernicus. So if other countries reach the same conclusion that Switzerland has - that open access makes paying in optional - there will be questions about the willingness of contributors to keep funding something others can use for free, or to continue today's open data policies for non-members.
Important to remember: The open-data policy has always been a political choice, not a law of nature. And the more it looks like it can be enjoyed without contributing, the more pressure builds to revisit the terms for those who don't.
In short: Please do not take open satellite data as a given!