A theory I have is that the designers who are jumping on the AI bandwagon were never truly creatives.
I've always held on to the idea that there are two types of designers out there:
1. Creatives, those who go off of gut instinct, channel their imagination and intuition.
2. Analytical designers, those who rely on data, metrics, and logic.
The designers who are embracing AI in droves, are the latter of the two because they were already on that path to begin with.
They look at design not as an adventure and more of just a problem to solve (1 2 = 3).
The truth of the matter is that, the best design is never just inputs or equations, it's intuition and imagination.
Yes, it can be honed with data and logic, but it never starts there, it always finishes.
A great example is Apple.
Look at all of the things that they've created while Jobs was still alive (iPod, iPhone, Mac, etc.).
After he died the imagination and intuition left and we got products like the HomePod, or the iPhone that's been bastardized to oblivion.
Now there are some things they've tried to do like the headset, but it was riding on the coattails of others' ideas, not uniquely their own.
I'm going to say the thing.
AI zaps all the joy in creativity.
I just spent the last 7 hours in Claude working on solving a major design problem for one of my clients.
They were trying to use Claude to build a master template to generate decks for their internal teams.
I'm still working on building the solution but I can tell you, I would have rather spent the 7 hours building 2-3 decks than doing this.
Even in mundane design there's at least some play, some joy, some fun.
This work... it's boring.
I know I can't be alone in feeling this.