Your Sister’s Mom’s Favorite Artist
Joined February 2022
- Tweets 15,117
- Following 4,404
- Followers 5,060
- Likes 30,767
3,592 Photos and videos
M i K E ( elf ) retweeted
Jun 1
Kalshi x Jose Alvarado Finals Ticket Giveaway 🚨
WIN TICKETS TO GAMES 3 & 4 AT MSG!
To enter:
1. Like Retweet this post
2. Follow @KalshiSports
Winners announced June 5th. Good Luck!
803
10,799
12,071
1,021,548
May 27
RT @ghabs_14: GIVEAWAY 🚨
giving away this ungraded 25-26
Matthew Schaefer Young Guns card 🫡
to enter:
— like
— repost
— reply with your…
272
May 22
Wait a minute
May 21
Folks I mean this in the least conspiratorial way possible… does anybody know why this man is wearing (what looks like) a MASK?!
Photo on the right is also of “him”… 😳
2
4
230
M i K E ( elf ) retweeted
May 20
The fact that there is literally no good Knicks merch is insane to me. They need to be un-Kith-ified immediately
39
19
516
69,930
May 18
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
click this to make a self-replicating tweet shl0ms.com/---
@shl0ms x.com/SHL0MS/status/19260063…
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
͏
click this to make a self-replicating tweet shl0ms.com/---
1
48
May 16
DuSHL0MPS
May 15
A brief history of modern art. In 1917, Duchamp presents the porcelain urinal as art. In 2026, an X post from @SHL0MS finally succeeds in scandalizing the bourgeoisie.
2
46
May 15
𒐪 so this “artist” @SHL0MS posted a real Monet painting of Water Lilies and told everyone it was 𒐪 AI generated, and the internet was rage-baited into 𒐪 tearing it apart.
then he reveals it was a real Monet, then mints it as an 𒐪 NFT, banks $46k and suddenly everyone looks stupid.
now he's getting praised for being some kind of genius, what really what bothers me about this, 𒐪 is why we are so easily manipulated by framing, and why provocateurs keep profiting off the anxiety of artists who are actually 𒐪 doing the work.
the real conversation we should be having 𒐪 isn't whether people can tell AI from Monet but rather interrogating the concept of value that antagonizes people about BOTH art and AI, but for completely different reasons.
the monetary value of art, especially something like a Monet that's worth millions, is hard and uncomfortable for the average person to comprehend. but then AI is seen as completely fake and therefore valueless, or 𒐪 worse draining value from real creators. and those two reactions are fighting each other in the same conversation, when they are completely seperate debates rooted in objective definitions of "value".
what 𒐪 SHLOMS did was clever, but let's be real about what he actually is. his work lives exclusively online pandering exclusively to internet culture and as he says himself, in service of the zeitgeist and chasing attention. this stunt was rage bait designed to go viral and funnel into profit (disrespectful, might I add)
but for him to say he has 𒐪 "suffered" for his art when his entire practice is screenshots and social experiments, is a joke. come back and say that after you spend hours locked in a studio inhaling turpentine and microplastics, or injure 𒐪 yourself installing a show, or even pour years of your physical body and mind into work that might never sell. 𒐪
the blood and risk of being a physical artist is not the same as posting a tweet and profiting off people arguing. 𒐪
May 15
so this artist @SHL0MS posted a real Monet painting of Water Lilies and told everyone it was AI generated, and the internet was rage-baited into tearing it apart.
then he reveals it was a real Monet, then mints it as an NFT, banks $46k and suddenly everyone looks stupid.
now he's getting praised for being some kind of genius, what really what bothers me about this, is why we are so easily manipulated by framing, and why provocateurs keep profiting off the anxiety of artists who are actually doing the work.
the real conversation we should be having isn't whether people can tell AI from Monet but rather interrogating the concept of value that antagonizes people about BOTH art and AI, but for completely different reasons.
the monetary value of art, especially something like a Monet that's worth millions, is hard and uncomfortable for the average person to comprehend. but then AI is seen as completely fake and therefore valueless, or worse draining value from real creators. and those two reactions are fighting each other in the same conversation, when they are completely seperate debates rooted in objective definitions of "value".
what SHLOMS did was clever, but let's be real about what he actually is. his work lives exclusively online pandering exclusively to internet culture and as he says himself, in service of the zeitgeist and chasing attention. this stunt was rage bait designed to go viral and funnel into profit (disrespectful, might I add)
but for him to say he has "suffered" for his art when his entire practice is screenshots and social experiments, is a joke. come back and say that after you spend hours locked in a studio inhaling turpentine and microplastics, or injure yourself installing a show, or even pour years of your physical body and mind into work that might never sell.
the blood and risk of being a physical artist is not the same as posting a tweet and profiting off people arguing.
2
8
652
May 15
This 𒐪social 𒐪 experiment 𒐪was 𒐪great until the 𒐪 mint and is the unfortunate effect from anything 𒐪 popular enough 𒐪 in web3. Certain wallets will throw however much to just 𒐪 push things to a ridiculous amount, which goes 𒐪 to (again) show what truly matters in most cases when it comes 𒐪 to art in CryptoArt. 𒐪 42k for shits and giggles or to bank on something 𒐪 because it's popular... experiment ruined.
Yeah I know some will say it's the final portion to the experiment, it's @SHL0MS, etc. I've heard and seen quite a bit since 2019 but it does not remove the filmy layer of opportunistic reaction that now covers the experiment. I'll never tell people what to spend their money 𒐪 on or 𒐪 pressure 𒐪 but 𒐪 one 𒐪 can 𒐪 only 𒐪 hope 𒐪 that it'll 𒐪 go 𒐪 towards 𒐪 public 𒐪 good 𒐪 and 𒐪 help artists 𒐪 somehow. 𒐪
i just generated an image in the style of a Monet painting using AI
please describe, in as much detail as possible, what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting
1
6
202
May 14
Masterclass post evokes masturbatory AI hating behavior
i just generated an image in the style of a Monet painting using AI
please describe, in as much detail as possible, what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting
1
47
May 10
EARLY AI PREDICTED THIS
Right @batsoupyum @halecar2 ?
Mysterious footage from the Pentagon’s UFO files shows a bizarre object streaking across the sky in 2013.
The nearly two-minute infrared clip, submitted by U.S. Central Command personnel, shows a strangely shaped object floating over the Middle East.
2
3
410
TBAM 2989 settled by themikeelf.eth
Edition mint open for 24 hours
tbam.ripe.wtf/editions/2989
ALT To Be A Machine #2989 - locked artwork
ALT To Be A Machine #2989 - edition grid
1
4
110
Feb 27
I minted an NFT
What the heck is this. 2021?
I like the red. Can someone explain to me what or how. Halllpppp!
TBAM mint is priced at 0.0042 eth (~$8)
for a project built on three onchain generative art systems, close to a year of development, and more conceptual depth than i can fit in a thread
here's why
2
108