You cannot sustain attraction with your woman by doing the things she is naturally and traditionally expected to do effectively: changing diapers, cooking, and cleaning. Doing all of this does not make you special. Because these are things she can do herself, your doing them will not register as some grand gesture deserving of special treatment. If she can do it, what, to her, is remarkable about your doing it? People rarely attach exceptional value to services they can readily provide for themselves. An electrician does not value the skills of a fellow electrician in the same way a doctor might. Familiarity reduces novelty, and novelty often influences appreciation. Point is, attraction is utility-based. Shared capability rarely inspires the same admiration as complementary capability. Changing diapers, cooking, and cleaning may not be the particular utilities that naturally command romantic attraction. They may make life easier, but ease and desire are not necessarily the same thing. The ultimate and more intimate assistance you can offer your woman is to do for her what she cannot easily do for herself. What compels and sustains attraction, is a gap in capability rather than a shared capability. Cooking, changing diapers, and cleaning may make you a better partner. But do not assume they will make her love or desire you more. Those are different currencies, and they do not always buy the same things. But i have said enough. Good luck. Or congratulations.

How to Earn a Billion Dollars: paulgraham.com/earn.html

If I were to advise someone who is considering buying stocks in the market right now, my recommended allocation would be: MTN Nigeria: 30% Seplat Energy: 25% Custodian Investment: 20% Wema Bank: 15% The Initiates: 10% The thinking is simple. We want the bulk of the money in companies that are already proven. Coys with scale. Coys with cash flow. Coys that can survive difficult cycles and still keep producing earnings. Then we want a smaller part of the portfolio in names that can grow faster, but where we must also respect the risks.

I’ve never seen anyone trying to sexualize Adele tho. An artist builds their entire brand and personal off of “sexual appeal”, they get sexualized and you make it a “guy’s” problem.

Look at that nice save at the end when he realized what he said could lead to some backlash. Insult dressed as admiration and you guys are lapping it up like the idiots that you are.

Okay, I think it’s time I give a big shout out to my guys who have been working 15 hours daily to make sure we get #powerandplunder out on time. Meet my senior video editor @thisismbg. He’s one of the editors behind the documentary channel. And here’s @Soulz_Cut, the guy behind @SahelChronicles. If videos are not ready on time, you now know who to hold responsible 😂.

bts

Wow! Motion capture studios not gonna love this! Just check this insane video. For years, capturing human motion meant markers, skin-tight suits, and hours of cleanup. MAMMA just asks for a few synced cameras pointed at the scene. Out comes a full 3D body for every person, every frame. No suits. No markers. The clever bit: instead of tracking a handful of joints, it reads hundreds of points. And it actually understands contact. It knows when a foot touches the ground, when two people are holding each other. So feet stop sliding and bodies stop passing through each other, even when dancers are tangled up close. When @Michael_J_Black calls this maybe the biggest day in 3D capture history, you pay attention. The kicker? It's basically as accurate as the gold-standard Vicon systems studios pay a fortune for. A multi-day pipeline drops to a single day. It even works with 4 iPhones. Here's why roboticists should care: clean, realistic human motion at scale, without the expensive rig. The thing holding humanoids back was never really the algorithm. It was the data. Keep up good work the @Hanzcun, @soyong_shin, @AYiannakidis and the rest of the MAMMA team!

Project: mamma.is.tue.mpg.de/ Code: github.com/cuevhv/mamma Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2506.13040

No interest. The majority of TV produced in recent years is mediocre and shallow. Audiences are desensitized and shows are adapted for people scrolling whilst watching. If you even blinked during The Wire you were fucked. Peak TV was between 1997 and 2017.

"I read and I forget everything." If you’ve heard these words from your child or student, you know the look of defeat on their face. They aren’t lazy or dull, they are just stuck in the cramming trap. Cramming turns 'A' students into 'D' students and crushes self esteem. But it

Blaqbonez need to see this 😂