BREAKING Gustavo Petro says he has verified documentation on how the election was manipulated. He writes:
I present the verified foundations of the possible fraud. Which I can deliver to the competent authorities.
I said that I did not recognize the data from the pre-count of the software from the Bautista brothers because I have data.
My commitment to my people and the love for my country, for which I have fought my entire life, makes me risk everything by transmitting it, and I am going to do it right now.
The registrar permanently refused to deliver the source code, which was the basic requirement for electoral transparency.
I did it because by the full ruling of the State Council of 2018, that software was declared vulnerable from the inside and from the outside.
In response to my complaint that the software was modified on days when, by legal rule, it should have remained unchanged, the registrar said it was impossible.
This only indicates that the registrary has no control over the software, as we already knew.
The software was indeed modified, and twice on May 26, 2026. The first modification occurred at 1:21:35 pm, and the second at 7:21:13 pm.
The modification consisted of altering the electoral census and the number of polling stations and tables. The newspaper El Tiempo managed to discover only the table modification.
The amount of the modification is as follows:
Official census 41,421,973. This figure was changed in DIVIPOL in the Bautista brothers' software on May 26, 2026, five days before the elections, to the following amount: 42,307,373.
The difference is 885,409 new IDs that were not registered on the legal date.
The voting stations were also varied, increasing them as follows:
From 13,742 official to 14,438 in DIVIPOL, Bautista brothers' software, difference of 696 voting stations.
This results in a change in the total numbers:
Official tables, already written: 120,527, but in DIVIPOL of the Bautista brothers, who are the ones who did the count, there are 122,020 with a difference of 1,493 additional tables, which possibly have not been scrutinized.
I can prove these facts before the competent authority.
In the vote count of the Bautista brothers, 5,300 tables appear with more than 300 votes on the day, which is the maximum figure that can be voted in the election hours, many reaching 700 votes.
It is in those tables where the advantage of 635,000 with which Abelardo surpasses Cepeda is located.
I deliver the complete data of the 5,300 tables.
They are trying to quickly close the scrutiny processes to avoid verifying my complaint.
The scrutiny of the 5,300 atypical polling stations is not done by counting the votes. The votes were already deposited in homogeneous jury polling stations, and the minutes contain the 885,400 illicitly added ballots on May 5.
On election day, a huge number of jurors were replaced.
The scrutiny must examine whether the voters are on the official census that was closed two months before the elections. If they are not, it is because they are not real voters.
If this operation is not carried out and the scrutiny processes are closed, this issue will go to the courts. But it will not be determined right now.
I request the registrar that, by the principle of transparency, the 5,300 polling stations that we will publish and deliver to you be examined.