Everything is man-word.
I never criticize anyone specific for our deepest error because it is universal. So, what I point out as the debilitating error, parasitism and cancer is primordial feminism. It has interjected itself in all of man since the beginning of language, by effeminizing and infantilizing man in every way as “human.”
As a result of the corruption, for example, Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's President and Chief Operating Officer and her apparent relationship (of 29 years) with the company and everything around it as if they are her and Elon's children, whereby her thanks to her partner and “also husband” is like an afterthought. Do I even have to say that is merely what I think?
Point-i proposes categorically that to use woman in such positions seems to make it easier for any man doing it for chronically acute domestic to political reasons, but that for the good of our species it is the most shortsighted thing any man can continue to do.
A more transitional example is the President of El Salvador's use of women in his cabinet probably temporarily to overcome PF's corruption of men in previous administrations, given that he is dismantling gender DEI in El Salvador's wider society.
Both examples remain part of the primordial repression (of the symbolic [man-linguistic] potential of woman as man's only proper bond to his and woman's ACTUAL children.) The reason that it is superficially easier for man to play house with institutions is that man has corrupted all of reality already with exactly such repression as the philosophy of the apparently positive commons from the beginning of language.
Primordial feminism is the brain fart of it being easier for man to say that woman is linguistically equal to man and more... hence the untethered cacophony of the fallacy, self-deception and mental disorderly farce (recently through psychology) that emotion is intelligence and therefore by confirmation bias that woman's man-unsteadied babble actually defines verbal intelligence!
Absolutely incredible that men have not defined it properly and allow it to continue! The confusion of the error in man, woman and child is devastating.
What PF undermines is man's Y-chromosomes with uniquely recursive palindromic self-similarity of word definition, that is, the wave-like semiosis of iconizing (thing-making) symbols. Uncorrupted men should know that things to any order of dynamics are things. They are nothing if not categorically defined by the copulas of what they are. There is no feeling that is not thus conceptualized. Man (not woman) is responsible for the absurdity of feelings first realities by which the delusion exists that it is good for “communication.”
Abolish such corruption of the primitive universal DEI of primordial feminism and develop the wider variable hierarchy of men with women the bonding agent between man and child throughout society and I am absolutely sure especially Elon Musk would have been many orders more effective.
Treating dogs like children is one thing...