lesbians sexuality will never be fluid. ur sexuality can be idgaf, but y’all r so male centred. u genuinely cannot fathom a person not having any sort of attraction to men that u try to include men in our sexuality
me incomoda como algumas tratam o próprio desconforto como análise política.
não gostar de strap é uma coisa. declarar o sexo de outras lésbicas "hetero" por causa disso é outra completamente diferente. x.com/cruelstone/status/2065…
chamar qualquer prática envolvendo strap/packer/pau de "sexo hetero" exige ignorar décadas de cultura sexual lésbica. é patético, é um discurso genitalista, reacionário e, para além disso, burro.
isso pressupõe que qualquer objeto fálico pertence simbolicamente aos homens. entende o problema?
o resultado é o mesmo de sempre: apagar transfem, apagar lésbicas transmascs, apagar butches stone e transformar o desejo lésbico em algo definido pela relação com homens.
autonomy over your own identity does not mean autonomy over the definition of every other identity.
men are not lesbians. that is true whether those men are cis or trans. >>lesbians are not attracted to men<<
we cannot keep doing this
trans men have the autonomy to label our own sexualities. some trans men identify as lesbian, some don’t. this has been happening for decades if not centuries. not all trans men are lesbians, but some are 👍👍
it's interesting how nobody argues that every identity needs to include men except when the identity in question is lesbian.
people seem deeply uncomfortable with women and lesbians having anything that isn't organized around men.
and redefining lesbianism around male inclusion does not make it more progressive, it erases the very boundary that made the word necessary in the first place.