If it wasn't clear why I said the fighter losses were more unimaginable than the helicopter losses, it's because the helicopter is an infernal machine which is inherently unstable and unnatural, and when it crashes to the earth in a cacophony of screeching metal, flinging its diabolical "rotor blades" into the distance, it's simply the natural state of things reasserting itself, and harmony being restored
Sorry to beat a dead horse, because I was just talking about this a few days ago, but anyone who has never looked into US air losses in Vietnam really should, it's mind blowing. It's unsurprising that we lost huge numbers of helicopters, but the total lost (5,607) was nearly 50% of the 11,846 that we used in the entire war.
The fixed-wing losses were even more unimaginable. We lost 3,744 aircraft, the majority in combat. This includes a staggering 31x B-52s and 55x C-130s. Our fighters fared much worse. We lost:
• 445x F-4s
• 243x F-100
• 382x F-105
The attrition rate for the RVNAF (South Vietnamese Air Force) was brutal. Of the 2,750 aircraft and helicopters they received, only 308 survived the war.
It's incredible to think about how we absorbed these losses, but American military hardware was significantly less expensive back then.