We're proud to announce that we've now entered a second hackathon: Solana Frontier Hackathon. The submission will be reviewed and completed towards the end of the month (when Hugr is ready).

Example result:

Introducing OpenStudio - a native macOS screen recording studio for only $5/mo.

Update on the streaming: I've had some issues with my monitor the past week (sizing issues with mac dock, iykyk). I've ordered a new dock so waiting on that, bear with me. It hasn't affected my work output but just no stream until the new dock arrives (few days I think). I could stream with just a single screen but don't want to risk leaking sensitive info.

Introducing Hugr - An open source framework for building, chaining and scheduling agent workflows. - Build custom AI workers - Wire in any LLM provider - Visual dashboard UI for building workflows, managing workers, configuring providers, scheduling and monitoring sessions - Built-in AI assistant that can create workflows, triggers and workers for you - 6 built-in agents - 5 preset utility agents - Pipeline templates across 6 categories out of the box: Development, Content, Research, Operations, Data and General - Schedule workflows with cron triggers - 20 trigger templates for common automations - Full git integration with three isolation modes - Supervised or fully autonomous execution - Clarification system - Structured message passing between agents via an append-only JSONL joblog - Configurable data storage path - Agents hand off context - Skill system - Full activity streaming - Session persistence and recovery Use it as a library in your own apps or run it standalone with the dashboard. MIT licensed, TypeScript ⭐️Star on: github.com/RuneLtd/hugr

@will8bit has to be one of the most based dev I've seen who has been shipping and building in public consistently and these are the people that I love to work with. Aped $rune at 40k some days back and been working on my thesis. For three years, the fight was Cursor vs. Windsurf vs. Claude Code vs. GitHub Copilot. Who has the best autocomplete. Who predicts your next line fastest. They were all fighting the wrong war. While they optimized for helping humans type code 10% faster, Rune shipped something completely different: the first editor where AI doesn't assist you it builds for you. The Old Game: Open any "AI coding tool" today. Same pattern: You write a comment: // function to validate email AI suggests the code. You press tab. Repeat 500 times. Call it "AI-powered development." The assumption baked into every tool: Human writes code. AI helps human write code slightly faster. Even the "best" tools are just autocomplete on steroids. Cursor gives you multi-line suggestions. Windsurf gives you "flow state" predictions. Claude Code gives you terminal commands. All optimizing the same workflow: human types, AI assists. Should humans be typing at all? In the big 26? Rune inverted the entire model. Download the app. Integrated editor loads—no VS Code, no setup, no configuration. Tell the Architect agent what you want to build. Watch what happens next. - Architect reads your request. Designs the system. Breaks it into components. Plans the file structure. - Coder implements each component. Not one line at a time entire files. React components, TypeScript configs, styling systems. Writes them directly into the integrated editor while you watch. - Raven reviews every file. Checks for bugs, performance issues, code quality. Forces Coder to iterate until it meets production standards. - You see the finished application in the workspace. Review components one by one. Approve, reject, or request revisions. Deploy. This isn't autocomplete. This is autonomous construction with human oversight. Cursor makes developers 10% faster. Rune makes non-developers capable of building production software. After v0.3.1: Rune = zero-code to full-code platform. TAM = 500 million knowledge workers who need software built. The examples that prove it: - Marketing manager needs campaign landing page. Before: hire dev ($2K, 3 days) or use Webflow (limited). After: open Rune, describe campaign, review AI-built components, deploy. 30 minutes. $0. - Startup founder needs MVP to show investors. Before: find technical co-founder or blow $50K on agency. After: Rune builds it while you eat lunch. Iterate based on user feedback same day. - Designer creates beautiful Figma mockup. Before: hand it to developer, wait for interpretation, complain about implementation. After: tell Rune to implement the Figma design. Agent builds pixel-perfect code. Designer reviews, tweaks, ships. - Sales team needs custom demo environment for enterprise deal. Before: beg engineering for weeks. After: describe the demo flow to Rune, deploy in hours. Every one of these people is now a Rune user. The market just went from "developers" to "everyone." Cursor is a VS Code fork. They're locked into Microsoft's architecture. They can't rebuild the editor without throwing away three years of work. Windsurf, same problem. Claude Code, terminal-only by design. - Rune owns the editor. Built from scratch for agent-first workflow. Every pixel optimized for: agent writes code → human reviews components → agent iterates based on feedback. Competitors can't pivot to this model without starting over. The next billion-dollar SaaS company won't have a dev team. They'll have a Rune subscription. By the time the market figures this out, Rune will be infrastructure everyone depends on. @runedotgl Ca: 9fAT1fVVEKMEL6rUeYxSYU8ZjQ5dSiTzAZYTdiPvpump