Yesterday, I made the post below. I raised the question: “What could possibly be the explanation for these 'clerical errors' in the commencement program?” We heard from A LOT of Erika Kirk supporters who offered off topic comments which really didn’t add any value to the discussion. However, graciously, some Erika supporters offered possible explanations: @deyni_zavala offered one potential explanation: “Anyone who went to college knows the Commencement Program is made weeks before graduation and does not reflect final grades. Latin honors are calculated after the semester is done.” ⭐️This seems like a possible explanation. @caragrace23 offered another potential explanation: “ASU doesn’t put that [Latin honors] on their graduation program.” ⭐️This seems less likely because the commencement program includes lists of students who obtained Latin honors. @mamiilife offered another potential explanation: “What's the date of her LinkedIn saying summa cum laude? Maybe that was a error/typo by an assistant” ⭐️This seems like a possible explanation. @blue52795 passionately engaged in debate with multiple people and offered multiple explanations as well: “Academic achievement is often awarded after the program has been printed. It is common.” ⭐️While I have never heard of this, it was similar to @deyni_zavala’s response so, again, it seems possible. @blue52795 also said, “Her Linkedin is not proof she lied. It was changed a couple of times and there is no proof she did it. It is easily hacked.” ⭐️While I have never encountered Linkedin hacking personally, it seems that it is possible Erika’s Linkedin account could have been hacked. ▶️At the end of the day, without official college transcripts, the FACTS of Erika’s academic achievements at ASU cannot be known. All we have is speculation based on the information available to us at this time—online bios, commencement program, and Erika’s own words in video recordings. While a lot of things are “possible”, I think it is reasonable to analyze the available facts in terms of probability. To that end, I have sought the opinions of Grok, Gemini, Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. My goal was to give Erika the benefit of the most favorable set of facts; therefore, I eliminated the Linkedin component from this analysis. I submitted the same query to all six platforms. [see query in comments] In the query, “Jane” represents Erika, and “Joe” represents Tyler Bowyer, who also graduated from ASU the same semester. I asked each platform to determine the three most probable (more likely than not) explanations for the discrepancies between Erika’s claims and the Commencement Program. The results are as follows: ⭐️⭐️Grok (see comments for link) Least Likely: The Commencement Program Is Substantially Incomplete, Erroneous, or Uses Narrow Naming Conventions That Omit Valid Achievements (Probability Well Below 50%) Moderately Likely: Jane Honestly Misremembers or Overstates Details Due to Confusion Over Majors, Minors, Certificates, or Honors Thresholds (Around 40–50% Range, Depending on Additional Context) Most Likely: Jane's Claims Involve Intentional or Reckless Exaggeration/Misrepresentation (Most Probable, >50%) ⭐️⭐️Gemini (see comments for link) The University Clerical Error Hypothesis (Least Likely) The Administrative/Timeline Discrepancy Hypothesis (Moderately Likely) Intentional or Habitual Embellishment (Most Likely) ⭐️⭐️Copilot (see comments for link) Least likely: ASU made multiple clerical or printing errors Moderately likely: Jane is describing her academic record imprecisely or using informal terminology Most likely: Jane overstated or misrepresented parts of her academic record ⭐️⭐️Chat GPT (see comments for link) Least Likely: The commencement program contains multiple errors affecting Jane's record Moderately Likely: Jane is substantially correct but is describing her academic program differently than the commencement program Most Likely: Jane has overstated or misrepresented her academic credentials ⭐️⭐️Claude (unable to share via link) Least likely: Jane represents a different person with a similar name or a misattribution occurred Moderately likely: Jane did complete a legitimate double major or honors, but the program data provided is incomplete or not fully reflective of her academic record Most likely: Jane embellished or fabricates aspects of her resume ⭐️⭐️Perplexity (see comments for link) Least likely: the commencement program is incomplete or contains an omission affecting Jane. Second most likely: Jane used an incorrect or informal description of her degree. Most likely: Jane exaggerated or misrepresented her academic achievements. 🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹 Huge thank you to everyone who stopped by to give their thoughts (whether relevant or not). Again, at the end of the day, only an official ASU transcript will answer the question: What is the explanation for the discrepancies between Erika’s claimed academic achievements and the ASU Commencement Program.

Wow. Just. Wow. 🤦‍♀️

This… @TPUSA used to welcome disagreement openly Now, @AndrewKolvet trolls and attacks anyone who challenges the narrative they’re pushing… @tylerbowyer will just block you if you step out of line. Not what @charliekirk11 stood for, at least to me 🤷‍♂️

There you again assuming things that are not true. I disagree with Candace on many things. You won't find even a single post from me where the basis of my opinion is "candace says" 🙄 I do my own research and inform my own opinions. Never seen a group of people make up shit as much as the Erika Excusers. .....guess that tracks.

We thought Part 1 was the story. We were so wrong. Our TPUSA investigation led us somewhere far deeper than we expected, and what we’ve uncovered next is bigger than anything we’ve released so far. Thank you to @MizzWelch and @stclairashley for helping get this information in front of the public. Last call for comment before Part 2. Coming soon.

Funny how you are only willing to consider concrete and/or direct evidence to form opinions about Erika's motives and integrity, but you are willing to speculate and rely on circumstantial evidence to form opinions as to MY motives, intentions, and integrity. To avoid being perceived as hypocritical, it would be better to apply your standards for "proof" equally rather than changing your burdens based on your desired narrative. But you guys keep doing you. You are doing great! 👍👍

Just finished the most recent hearing a few moments ago. I have watched most of the hearings actually.

Also, just so you know the map where these pins are located....is "clubamerica.com" ---the first two w's in the web address stand for "world wide". The "world wide" nature of the Club America website far exceeds the potential visibility of an X post by a person with 1,000 followers.

Learn how to speak and communicate clearly on the show that you’ve stolen from Charlie. You two are so bad at communication that it led everyone to believe that when you said troll the trolls, it meant you fabricated something to mess with those people . Release the entire video with context and all. 15 minutes before and fifteen minutes later the statement you guys showed. 30 minutes worth of hearing Charlie again.

Sorry my comment was unclear: what evidence would Candace have to show to convince you? It seems TPUSA supporters operate with a different burden of proof than what I am accustomed to...so, just curious what level of evidence would you required to convince you? The answer to this question cant be anything about Candace because its about what YOU consider to be compelling evidence.

And, typically, a lot of accusation are confessions due to emotional projection. What's your point? We just sharing random facts?

She’s trying to distract everyone from this 👇🏻

@BeFreeWherever 😂😂😂

Hi. Thanks so much for your feedback. I have attempted to get these inquries addressed through official TPUSA channels, but thus far that has been unsuccessful. While I understand that your cognitive processing is telling you that I am to blame, the true blame lies with TPUSA for exposing these private businesses and homes to potential threats by placing pins in their locations on their Club America map. Hope this helps to clarify for you---although I know you will continue to operate with your head in the sand beliving TPUSA can do no wrong. Do yourself a favor and come up for air every once in a while. 🫶

Much better! Thank you @Kayla3707613614 for your commitment to detail! You are a valuable member of the @RealCandaceO cult. Appreciate you! 🫶

Yes! You didnt know!? Send me a message, and I will hook you up with the Cult Wardrobe Director. We got to get you right! I will also need your head circumference for your flower crown!

Ok great. 👍👍👍 Thank you again for your feedback. Boosting my views.

@BeFreeWherever triggered the bots again! 😂😂😂 Apparently use of TPUSA's publically available email for inquiries is "entitlement" on my part. They all came with the same script. Demonic entitlement 😂😂😂

As soon as I find a cult, you are welcome to call us out. Appreciate your engagement. You guys are the best!

If you guys are getting paid for this, tell your handlers your programming SUUUUUUUUCCCCCKKKS. Worst come backs ever. Give me something of some substance. The cult thing is so damn lame.