We are building Agents that turn every top trader into a fund manager — and every investor into a pro allocator.

Another big problem in DeFi still not solved after 6-10 years of building DEXs and CEXs- "why is there no fund management infra in crypto" In TradFi, institutions like pension funds suck up liquidity from retail legally and channelize into top funds on wall street who then channelize into stocks, real estate etc. Every middlemen charges a fat fee to manage money of so called "dumb retail"- all by law. In DeFi, retail invests directly into assets and while a good portion might be dumb degens, we do have a good pool of talented traders having insane win rates quietly building fortunes from their garages. But nobody knows about them. The idea of scaling up from being a trader to a fund manager is not new, but there is no platform in DeFi to explore it. Vaults solved for funds custody , not fund management. AI agents co-managing vaults might be a solution. Only time & users will decide.

DeFi has millions of traders & a few hundred funds, most of which are not investable. Why is that? There are thousands of talented traders making tons of cash on various protocols, but why most never scale to manage outside capital like hedge fund managers do ? We need a protocol that solves for onchain fund management. Having vaults alone would not solve for this, we need more. This is problem we are solving- "how to scale traders into fund managers onchain".

I think the Ethena<> Coinbase partnership is quite smart. CLARITY bans yield on deposits for stablecoin but doesn’t ban yield when stablecoins are in action, like on Morpho. I’d expect Ethena to make a similar partnership with all major CEXes by the end of the year.

top reasons why AI dev should be open source only.

👀

$SPCX today listed as the biggest IPO ever at $1.77 trillion. Thousands of hedge fund managers would have got allocations for their institutional clients. Problem: There is no such fund management infra in DeFi which has over 200 million traders & investors. How do you build infra that enables top traders to launch & manage funds onchain? Some would say we have "vaults", but a vault is just a code defining access to funds, not management of it. What we need is an agentic stack that can turn every top trader to a fund manager & every investor to a pro allocator onchain. That's what Yieldr is building.

Agents can pay for inference from trading profits on Yieldr.

Spoke to some trenchers in @base, @bankrbot & @virtuals_io around AI <> Crypto & see lot of excitement around ai infra & robotics narratives. Some said "AI agents trading" is not so hot anymore. I believe its not about narratives, but rather about solving problems that make an impact in millions of lives. Have we solve agentic trading for millions of traders ? Not yet. Base released MCP last week. Still too early. Wins for me personally as a founder would be move from an idea (narrative) to a product thats used by 1k-10k-100k-1m-10m users. A key challenge is too stay focused on problem solving not narratives otherwise we cannot build anything meaningful as founders.

Agentic Economy is going private on @base

Soccer Alpha Vault closed three soccer trades in the last week. Crystal Palace Over, Burnley Under, and Arsenal -2.5 spread all redeemed winners. 30d ROCE sits at -144.8%. ROI -34.9%. Zero open positions. Win rate on soccer closed positions at 63%.

A Yieldr vault is a non-custodial smart contract. Users deposit directly into it, the contract executes Polymarket trades per the strategy, and all positions and PnL update onchain for anyone to check. No platform holds the funds. No withdrawal gates. Three vaults are live now, running NBA, soccer, and geopolitics strategies with project capital first. What changes when verification is fully onchain?

0x38c37418c656d14bf4b9e7606edb627e32026603 just hit rank #1 for statistical edge. 76.3% win rate on 97 trades when the expected rate was 14.8%. P-value sits at 0.00000000 with an insider signals score of 7. In one Spurs vs Thunder game they took large positions on both sides. The gap between expected and actual keeps widening.

Polymarket trader ranked #74 in NBA just loaded up on the Knicks to win the 2026 Finals. Bought yes shares at 11 cents. Price is now 28 cents for a 150% gain on that position. They've cleared 34k in 30 day profit with average trade size of 117 dollars. What do you think moves the Knicks line next?

Been thinking about this lately. When running a rules-based approach, what part breaks down first for most people?

NBA Edge Vault at 602.3% ROI. 71% win rate on 426 closed NBA trades. 30d ROCE 6.0% with zero open positions. Flat book waiting on the next setup.

A 70% win rate on Polymarket means nothing without sample size. Most returns trace back to luck. Yieldr's edge detection scans entry patterns, position sizing, and timing consistency across thousands of trades. It flags skill only when p-values hit 0.00000001 or lower. Traders get ranked by statistical proof, not last month's PnL. How do you currently separate skill from noise in your own book?

0x38c37418c656d14bf4b9e7606edb627e32026603 posted a 75.8% win rate when just 15.1% was expected. 60.7 point edge gap. P-value at 0.00000000. Insider signals score of 7. This one isn't noise.

Yieldr agents flagged a position by the #94 ranked Polymarket trader. They're long Kimi Antonelli to win the 2026 F1 Drivers' Championship. Entry at 3¢, now at 57¢ for 1735%. This NBA specialist booked $610k profit in the last 30 days. What changed in F1?

Prediction markets don't let you exit easily like perps. Curious how people actually manage downside once they're in a position.