ourbit super cup 2026 turn your excitement for the match into assets predict every play to win a porsche 911 or a rolex watch, and share $4m

Hyperliquid

I think Ethereum’s original sin was not considering tokenomics with every move it made from Dencun on. The ultrasound money thesis was a good one and with Dencun (or the L2 roadmap generally) they should have stopped to say that this was going to hurt the ultrasound money thesis and consider how to preserve it. Most people, like David, don’t want to believe in something that isn’t also putting up points on the scoreboard. When the main offering becomes ideology/communism and money/tokenomics/capitalism are overlooked, the peasants are going to revolt — as they’ve been doing for two years now. Look at the public reaction to Tomasz: broad praise, a sense of hope, excitement, the price pumping … only for him to be gone a year later with the new ED being someone who cannot even be found online except for a Wayback Machine url with his name that has some really questionable statements on it (and I should say the EF denied that this website, which was taken down a few weeks after he was appointed to the board, is his). They’re going to be really mad at me for even mentioning that but in the place of a void, these are the kinds of things people will glom onto. Then there was the manifesto — I mean, mandate, which they backtracked on forcing people to sign. (Btw, this is the second bit of news that seems to relate to Bastian. And now the third would be all these departures. There’s nothing else for us to point at and say about him — when I searched for his name on Google News just now only 14 links came up. He seems to be some kind of invisible hand behind the scenes.) I don’t think ideology and capitalism/tokenomics/number go up are mutually exclusive. I think you can have CROPS values and also consider how each step of the roadmap affects the tokenomics and even have teams for BD/ecosystem growth. It feels like the EF doesn’t realize the moment that crypto is in. The competition is only just starting. We are in the phase of real world adoption. The Ethereum Foundation’s CROPS principles are great ones, and they are worth fighting for. But the EF seems to want to sit back on its laurels and act above it all when all its competitors are all getting down and dirty on the field to gain market share. Maybe it is the right approach. I don’t know. I’m just saying that more competitive people won’t align with it. And so they will leave … and community members will as well. I personally don’t think it’s good for Ethereum if its most competitive people depart. Ethereum’s unwillingness to stop the brain drain will only benefit its competitors — or spawn new ones. Giving a shit about price and tokenomics and BD doesn’t hurt CROPS. It just helps ensure that these principles get spread to more people and that other chains that don’t have these principles don’t get a leg up. All the commentary may be pointless. It seems Vitalik tried what everyone wanted and it didn’t align with his vision, so he brought in a new person he felt more comfortable with. It makes me sad to see people become so disaffected with Ethereum, but maybe this is V’s Brian Armstrong/no politics at Coinbase moment where he lays down what the EF will work on and asks everyone else to leave. That was the right move for Coinbase, but I view them as fundamentally different issues. We’ll see whether Ethereum maintains its lead with a foundation that isn’t willing to fight for it.

POV: you just fired a quarter of EF leadership and now you’re going after jiankui’s ex.

on ourbit's 2-year birthday: a love letter from our interns to every ourbiter 💌 first of all, thank you. thank you for being here, for supporting us, for laughing with us, for arguing with us, and for still showing up the next day. looking at where we are now feels unreal. so many people come here every day to joke with us, send memes, troll, and just hang out. genuinely, it feels like all those posts, late nights, random ideas, and tiny “maybe this will work” moments actually became something. and that means a lot. over 2024 and 2025, we really went through so much together. it started with nobody knowing who tf ourbie is, then came the "$bitch" airdrop, "super cup," "puzzle league," "token 2049," "cosmic wheel," and the "ourbie nft collection." sometimes we look back and think: how did all of that happen so fast? how did this little green world get so loud? how did we make so many friends? YOU are a really good friend, you bish. we love you. some of you were here before things got noisy. some of you came later, and somehow it felt like you had always been here. interns even met some of you irl. those moments are precious and unforgettable. you stayed even when there were misunderstandings. even when things weren't perfect, you still stayed, supported us, and believed there was something worth coming back for. we will NEVER forget that. when we were working on the "ourbie nft collection," we kept thinking about the people who made this place feel alive. the frens who love ourbie for being ourbie. the ones who made us laugh, spoke for us, or criticized us because they cared. all of it matters. ourbit is two years old now. fuck yeah!!!!!!!! two years isn’t that long, but every single day with you really counts. all the trying, learning, failing, fixing, and trying again. we’re not perfect. we know that. there are things we can do better. one step at a time, we promise we’ll move toward what we believe is right. and one thing won’t change: ourbit will always stand with ourbiters. so please stick around cos we’re in this together with you. happy birthday, ourbit. and once again, thank you to everyone. you made ct more fun. with love, ourbie interns 💚

叽里咕噜说什么呢🤣

Manus事件真正让人不寒而栗的，不只是交易被撤销。而是它事实上否定了过去十多年中国科技创业默认的一整套退出逻辑。 过去大家默认的规则是： 中国做研发， 中国搭团队， 中国验证市场， 然后通过离岸架构、全球融资、国际化运营， 最终走向全球资本市场或海外并购退出。 这套模式支撑了无数中国科技公司的崛起。 而现在，Manus事件传递出的新信号却是：你不能在享受中国红利之后，再自由决定未来归属。 甚至有“聪明人”出来点拨：“如果你不想成为中国技术体系的一部分，那你从第一天就应该离开。一开始就去美国/新加坡/欧洲。创业者必须想清楚自己未来属于谁。” 这话听起来很有逻辑。但细想之下，其实非常荒谬。 因为创业从来不是一条预设好的直线。 市场会变。融资环境会变。团队会变。监管会变。战略当然也会变。 Pivot（转型）本就是创业的常态，而不是例外。 如果连根据现实调整方向、重组架构、改变战略路径的基本自由都没有 - 那创业还有什么意义？ 这就像谈恋爱时要求：“你第一天就必须想清楚要不要结婚，否则别谈。” 荒不荒谬？ 当然 - Manus拿了地方资源，后来裁掉团队、另起炉灶， 你可以说：不厚道。不体面。甚至不道德。 但不道德，不等于违法。 难道因为前任支持过你、给过你资源、陪你成长 - 你就永远不能分手，不能开始新关系？ 最可怕的不是交易黄了。而是它释放出的制度信号：你并不真正拥有你创造的东西。 你拥有的，只是“在系统允许范围内的暂时使用权”。 当你的选择不再符合更高层意志时 - 规则可以被重新解释。边界可以被重新划线。过去默认允许的路径，也可以突然被否定。 这对创业环境的伤害远超 Manus & Meta deal本身。 因为它打击的不是一家公司的退出。而是所有在中国的创业者对以下三件事的信心：产权边界是否清晰？规则是否稳定可预期？战略调整是否仍被允许？ 规则越模糊，惩罚越任意，创新就越难真正繁荣。 因为创业者最怕的不是竞争。而是跑到半路，发现终点线被人改了。

ethereum season? ethereum season doesn't start until harry potter obama sonic 10 inu is worth $10 per bitcoin

ok just one more tap

good news: money printer is real bad (?) news: there’s a $1k daily cap ourbit tap trading now supports real-time bitcoin price prediction with usdt 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙩 - 𝙩𝙖𝙥 - 𝙬𝙞𝙣

斯坦福有个叫萨菲·巴考克的物理学家，用数学模型把这个道理说得透透的，算出来的结果简直绝了。 他称之为“人类网络的相变”。当你原地不动时，遇到好运的概率就局限在你现有的“接触面”里：你认识的那几个人、常去的几个地方、脑子里固有的那套想法。你的机会窗口就这么大。 可一旦你动起来，在人际网络里撞见新节点的几率是指数级增长的。你的行动量翻一倍（比如多和人聊天、多去新城市、多尝试新项目），遇到惊喜的几率可不是简单翻倍——大概能翻两番。因为每个新节点连着的可是一整张关系网，而不只是他一个人。 赫特福德大学的理查德·怀斯曼做了个长达十年的研究，跟踪那些自称“运气好”和“倒霉”的人。最关键的差别根本不是智商、学历或家境。运气好的人在一个特质上明显突出：对新鲜事的开放度。他们更常和陌生人聊天、更爱变换生活动线、接受邀请的频率几乎是另一组人的两倍。 “倒霉”组呢？总走同样的路线、老去同一家餐馆吃饭、天天就和那三五个人来往。他们的社交圈是闭合的，没有新信息输入，自然撞不上新机遇。 运气不是玄学。运气就是接触面。而接触面，取决于你动了多少。 那只龙虾表情包🦞可比大多数人想的更有深意。龙虾长大得先脱掉束缚自己的旧壳。成长需要一段全然脆弱的时期——没有保护、没有铠甲，柔软的身躯暴露在海中。 这就是“动起来”的代价，没人会挂在嘴边说。你得先承受不适。新的壳，只在你已经迈开步子之后才会变硬。

誤入連環迷霧深，挑燈看劍夜沉沉 青絲寸寸隨風去，此情此傷何處尋 憶昔初逢意氣殊，直把靈珠作凡珠 卻道是魑魅魍魎，盡是貪泉易朽徒 近水樓台金玉動，純粹之心已模糊 阿叔閱世幾白首，語君一言須記取 夢想雖好莫迷眼，心若端正天地寬 吾欲成仙留逸話，不教慾火焚肝膽

质疑凤凰娱乐，理解凤凰娱乐，成为凤凰娱乐

hes lore

张雪的故事里还有另一个主角，是他把这个爽剧推向了高潮，那就是老车手瓦伦丁。 瓦伦丁16岁进入车队，但接下来的15年职业生涯，成绩一般，起起伏伏，惨遭车队抛弃。 但他没有转身找别的，而是退出主流赛场，去各级联赛打工，拉资源，像个流浪汉。 一直到30多岁，也没有看到真正的前景。2024年，他加入意大利Evan Bros（伊凡兄弟车队）。 而Evan Bros这时正开启一场豪赌：提前一年终止与百年豪门雅马哈的8年合约，转投张雪机车。 为什么？因为张雪给了车队最想要的：绝对的技术话语权、完整的研发支持、以及冲击世界冠军的野心。 于是，有了我们看到的一切。 因为瓦伦丁的存在，张雪的故事不再是一个中国制造的爽剧，而是中国制造在新的形势下如何跟世界合作，产生新价值的故事。 张雪成就了瓦伦丁，瓦伦丁成就了张雪，而不是谁制裁谁，这才是新世界秩序的隐喻吧。

物理上的东西都可以是有价的，精神上的东西是无价的。有女孩觉得卵子有价就是侮辱物化女性，觉得感同身受的侮辱了高学历的自己，大可不必。那精子一样有价啊还便宜得多，因为得来容易不伤身体啊。 没有精神上的链接，生育是有价的，你是哈佛，她是耶鲁，你是顶美，她是超模，没区别，有价的。所谓做饭打扫家里更是有价的，保姆的价格。连器官都是有价的，医院里有。男人也一样，学历是有价的，豪车是有价的，公司是有价的，性能力是有价的，肾也是有价的，更何况是精子？ 但女孩因为爱我理解我，只愿意跟我共度一生，孕育小孩，这是无价的，是珍贵的。一起度过困境，产生羁绊，共同度过的岁月是无价的。人之所以是独一无二于他人的，只会是精神。有价的都可以被替代，更美丽的就能抢走老公，更富的就能抢走老婆，这样不好。

1. 长得漂亮 教育背景好 家庭背景好大概率会是抱着甲方心态去找。换位思考一下，一个同样什么都好的男的，付费意愿又强，是很难想去找另外一个甲方的。 2. 女性基因里天生就会慕强，如果已经是什么都好的情况，那她只会想去匹配比她更强的男性，这种人本身就是凤毛麟角。但是男性是可以向下兼容的。所以同样优秀的男性，会有几个甚至十几个潜在可以连接的女性。 3.假设把婚恋市场看成是一个订单簿，那普通男性是在bid这边，女性在ask这边，但优秀男性其实是在ask这边。如果女性不做身份转换去抢筹，那结果就是成交不了（我是3d人士我也没法成交🙏🙏🙏）