Google acaba de liberar sus skills oficiales para agentes de IA: 13 habilidades compatibles con Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot y otros agentes del mercado. Estas skills funcionan como complementos que amplían lo que los agentes pueden hacer, permitiéndoles ejecutar tareas avanzadas y automatizar flujos de trabajo complejos sin necesidad de configuraciones interminables. Lo mejor de todo: son completamente GRATIS y OPEN SOURCE, así que cualquiera puede integrarlas y empezar a sacarles partido desde el primer minuto. Un paso enorme para democratizar el desarrollo con agentes. GUÁRDALO 🙇‍♂️

The same country that put humans on the Moon in 1969 now takes an average of 4.5 years to approve major infrastructure permits.. longer than it took to build the Panama Canal.  Transmission lines average 10 years from permitting to completion. The bottleneck to abundance is not technology, but BUREAUCRACY!

Gemma 4 Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) weights are now available on Ollama! They reduce memory requirements while maintaining model quality. E2B: ollama run gemma4:e2b-it-qat E4B: ollama run gemma4:e4b-it-qat 12B: ollama run gemma4:12b-it-qat 26B: ollama run gemma4:26b-a4b-it-qat 31B: ollama run gemma4:31b-it-qat Try them with ollama launch integrations to use with your favorite tools 👇👇👇

This might be the biggest sanction yet against a pro se litigant who misused AI: The appellant, representing herself, filed an appellate brief that "include[d] fictitious cases generated by artificial intelligence, which prevent this Court from engaging in meaningful review." Court dismissed the appeal on that basis and because of other court rule violations, and "given the frivolousness of the appeal," awarded the other party "$10,000 in damages." As to the fake cases, the appellant's "citations present a much more serious and fundamental issue than poor briefing; citing nonexistent caselaw constitutes making a false statement to this Court." "There is no excuse for citing to fictitious caselaw generated by A.I. in an appellate brief." "Boatner’s submission of fictitious cases constitutes an abuse of the judicial system and represents a flagrant violation of the duties of candor owed to this Court by parties, including pro se litigants." "The utilization of A.I. does not excuse a party’s responsibility of confirming the existence of the cases cited in support of his or her arguments. Boatner, just like any party before this Court, has an ethical duty to demonstrate candor."