During lockdowns I worried about keeping family healthy/taking the right supplements (C, D, zinc, quercetin). Then learned about HCQ, Ivermectin, adverse reactions to jabs. Monoclonal antibodies were in my periphery; quickly came/went, but take a listen: americaoutloud.news/dr-ron-e…

Mike Pompeo just confessed. In a June 8 tribute to the late MI6 chief, Trump's "most loyal" CIA director admitted he flew British intelligence to Langley to "plan and coordinate" in his first weeks on the job. Plan what, exactly? @BarbaraMBoyd has the answer. 👇

"Today, Melania and I join in prayer with Catholic Bishops gathered in Orlando, Florida, as they consecrate the United States of America to the Sacred Heart of Jesus on the occasion of our 250th year of American Independence..."whitehouse.gov/briefings-sta…

“There is a building material that does not burn, that does not rot” “In 1937 the US Government made it a crime to grow the plant it comes from”

This picture alone destroys the myth that Mary had other children outside of Jesus

PETROS ENI “PETER IS INSIDE” or “PETER IS HERE” An ancient Greek graffito found scrawled on a red plastered wall during excavations beneath St. Peter's Basilica above a tomb

His internet has been slow for 6 months. So, he paid Comcast to upgrade his tier. Speeds got worse. He called Comcast again. They blamed his router. He bought a new one. Still slow. He called a third time. They sent a technician out. The tech ran a speed test from inside the modem and said:"Speeds are fine on our end. Must be your devices." A neighbor who works in IT came over the next weekend with his laptop. He looked at the router for two minutes, opened the admin panel, and pointed at four settings on the screen. "Comcast pushed a firmware update last year. They enabled all four of these silently. This is why your internet is slow. This is why every Comcast customer's internet got slower around the same time." Here's exactly what he found and turned off. 🧵

Over 70% of humanity underwent a chemical lobotomy masquerading as “vaccination.” Two of our studies found 146 brain, spinal cord, and psychiatric CDC/FDA safety signals were BREACHED with the mRNA shots: 📈 Prion disease — 847× more likely vs. flu shot 📈 Brain clots – 3,000× more likely 📈 Psychosis – 440× more likely 📈 Dementia – 140× more likely 📈 Suicidal thoughts – 150× more likely 📈 Schizophrenia – 315× more likely 📈 Depression – 530× more likely 📈 Homicidal ideation – 25× more likely 📈 Herpes zoster meningitis — 1,200× more likely 📈 Toxic encephalopathy — 157× more likely 📈 Brain abscess — 120× more likely 📈 Violent behavior – 80× more likely 📈 Cognitive decline – 115× more likely 📈 Delusions – 50× more likely 📈 Many more...... The mRNA shots disrupt the blood–brain barrier, allowing mRNA, amyloidogenic spike proteins, and pathogens to penetrate the brain and spinal cord — an outcome consistent with the skyrocketing rates of cognitive decline now seen across the world.

A tiny bee just did what chemotherapy couldn't. Scientists in Australia discovered that honeybee venom can wipe out 100% of aggressive breast cancer cells in under 60 minutes. And the healthy cells around them? Barely touched. The breakthrough came from Dr. Ciara Duffy and her team at the Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, working alongside the University of Western Australia. They tested venom drawn from 312 honeybees and bumblebees across Australia, Ireland, and England. The target: triple-negative breast cancer and HER2-enriched breast cancer. Two of the deadliest, most stubborn forms of the disease. The weapon: melittin. The same tiny peptide that makes a bee sting burn. At one specific dose, melittin tore through cancer cell membranes completely within an hour. Within just 20 minutes, it shut down the chemical signals cancer cells need to grow and multiply. Bumblebee venom, which lacks melittin, did nothing. Zero effect, even at high concentrations. Scientists then recreated melittin synthetically in the lab and got almost identical results, meaning no bees need to be harmed to develop the therapy. Published in the peer-reviewed journal npj Precision Oncology, the findings are still early-stage. Human trials haven't happened yet. But one thing is clear. Nature has been hiding answers in plain sight all along, sometimes inside the smallest creatures on Earth. Source: Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research / npj Precision Oncology (Dr. Ciara Duffy et al.)

This Old Testament prophecy proves Roman Catholicism. It's specific. It's detailed. It was written 500 years before Jesus was born. And once you see it, you can't unsee it. It's in Daniel chapter 2. King Nebuchadnezzar has a dream that terrifies him — a massive statue with four sections (Daniel 2:31-33): — A head of gold — A chest and arms of silver — A belly and thighs of bronze — Legs of iron, with feet of iron mixed with clay Daniel tells the king exactly what it means. Each section represents a kingdom that would rule over God's people in succession (Daniel 2:36-43): Babylon. Persia. Greece. Rome. This isn't speculation. This is just what the Bible plainly says. And history confirms every single one. But then Daniel says something that should stop every Protestant in their tracks: "In the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed, nor shall its sovereignty be left to another people... and it shall stand for ever." — Daniel 2:44 In the days of those kings. Meaning during the Roman Empire. So ask yourself — which church actually began during the Roman Empire? Not Lutheranism. That started in 1517. Not Anglicanism. That started in 1534. Not Calvinism. That started in 1536. Every Protestant denomination came roughly 1,500 years too late to fulfill this prophecy. And Daniel doesn't stop there. He says: "A stone was cut out by no human hand, and it smote the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces... but the stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth." — Daniel 2:34-35 The stone is a kingdom established by God Himself. A kingdom that would spread across the entire world. A kingdom that would never be destroyed. Only one church in human history checks all four boxes: ✅ Founded during the Roman Empire (33 AD) ✅ Established by God Himself (not by a reformer) ✅ Spread across the entire globe ✅ Still standing 2,000 years later And here's the part that should give every honest reader chills. Out of all twelve apostles, Jesus singles out one man. He changes his name from Simon to Peter — which literally means rock (John 1:42). Then He says: "You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it." — Matthew 16:18 So where does Peter end up? Where does he shed his blood for Christ? Where does he lay the foundation of the Church that Jesus promised would never fall? Rome. The stone cut by no human hand — Christ Himself — comes down from heaven during the reign of the Roman Empire. He builds His Church on Peter, who participates in Christ's "rockness" (as Augustine and Aquinas both put it). Peter goes to Rome, dies in Rome, and lays the foundation of Roman Catholicism. And get this — the Catholic Church is the oldest continuously operating organization on the face of the earth. Every empire that ever persecuted the Church has crumbled to dust. The Catholic Church is still here. Two thousand years later. Exactly like Daniel said. Scripture predicted it. History confirmed it. The Church Fathers taught it. And the Catholic Church still stands today as living proof. So the real question isn't whether Daniel's prophecy points to Catholicism. The question is — what are you going to do about it? Share with a friend who needs to know this.

Aquinas gives Catholics the question sola scriptura cannot answer: What is the formal object of faith? Not the material object. The formal object. The material object of faith is WHAT you believe: Trinity, Incarnation, Eucharist, Baptism, canon of Scripture, forgiveness of sins, resurrection of the body. The formal object is WHY you believe it. That distinction matters. In Summa Theologiae II-II, Q.1, Aquinas says the object of faith is the First Truth. We believe Christian doctrine because God reveals it. Not because it seems plausible. Not because a preacher made a strong case. Not because we personally found a verse persuasive. Faith is divine because its motive is divine. Then Aquinas makes the point even sharper in II-II, Q.5, A.3. A person can believe many true doctrines. He may confess the Trinity. He may believe the Resurrection. He may quote Scripture. He may defend biblical morality. He may sound very orthodox on many points. But if he rejects one article of faith obstinately, Aquinas says he does not retain the habit of faith. Why? Because he no longer adheres to the formal object of faith. He is not believing because God has revealed through the rule established by God. He is believing because his own private judgment has approved this article and rejected that one. That is not the Catholic act of faith. It is private theological judgment using Christian premises. Aquinas says the formal object of faith is the First Truth as manifested in Holy Scripture and the teaching of the Church. Read that again. Not Scripture isolated from the Church. Not Scripture interpreted by every individual as final judge. Not Scripture filtered through a confession, seminary, or favorite sermon series as the ultimate rule. First Truth manifested in Scripture and the teaching of the Church. This is the problem sola scriptura cannot solve. It shifts the formal object of faith from God revealing through His Church to the individual judging what counts as revelation and what it means. The Protestant says, "I believe the Bible." Good. Which Bible? Sixty-six books? Seventy-three? Who decided? The Protestant says, "Scripture interprets Scripture." Fine. According to whom? The Lutheran says baptism regenerates. The Baptist says it does not. The Calvinist says Christ died only for the elect. The Methodist says He died for all. The Anglican says one thing this century and another thing the next. Every one of them opens the Bible. Every one of them claims the Holy Spirit. Every one of them says the text is clear. So who has the divine authority to settle the dispute? If the answer is "the Bible," you have not answered the question. You have named the battlefield. A text must be interpreted. A canon must be identified. A creed must be defined. Heresy must be condemned. The Arians had verses. The Nestorians had verses. The Monophysites had verses. Every major heresy in Christian history appealed to Scripture. What settled those disputes was not private interpretation. It was the Church. This is why Nicaea matters. The doctrine of the Trinity was not settled by handing Arius and Athanasius a Bible and saying, "Good luck, gentlemen." It was settled by bishops in council, exercising the authority of the Church, defining the rule of faith against heretical interpretation. And Protestants still recite the result. They inherit the Catholic conclusion while rejecting the Catholic principle that made the conclusion binding. That is incoherent. Aquinas saw the problem with mathematical precision. If you believe the Trinity because the Church, guided by God, proposes it as revealed truth, your act of faith has the right formal object. If you believe the Trinity because you personally judge the verses to teach it, then your formal object is your judgment. The conclusion may be true. The mode of assent is not the same. That is the key. Two men can say the same creed for radically different reasons. The Catholic says: I believe because God reveals, and the Church He founded proposes this truth with divine authority. The Protestant says: I believe because I think this is what Scripture means. Those are not the same act. One is faith as Aquinas defines it. The other is private theological judgment. This is also why "mere Christianity" collapses. There is no such thing as Christianity detached from the authority that tells you what Christianity is. You cannot have the Trinity without Nicaea. You cannot have the canon without the Church. You cannot have orthodoxy without an authority capable of saying, "This is the faith, and that is heresy." And once you admit that authority exists, the central question becomes unavoidable. Where is that authority? It is not in the individual believer. That is private judgment. It is not in the local pastor. He can be wrong. It is not in the denomination. Denominations contradict each other and revise themselves. It is not in an invisible church. Invisible authorities cannot define visible doctrines, settle visible disputes, or excommunicate visible heretics. It must be a visible, apostolic, teaching Church with authority to bind the faithful in the name of Christ. That is the Catholic Church. This is why Aquinas is so important. He does not begin with "Rome is right because Rome says so." He begins with the nature of faith itself. Faith requires a divine formal object. A divine formal object requires divine revelation. Divine revelation must be proposed to man by an infallible rule, otherwise the believer is left deciding for himself which alleged revelations count. But once the believer decides for himself, the formal object has shifted from God revealing to man judging. That is the Protestant problem. This does not mean Protestants are insincere. It does not mean they lack love for Christ. It does not mean they hold no true doctrines. It means sola scriptura cannot produce the Catholic act of faith as Aquinas describes it. Because the Catholic act of faith is not "I accept whatever doctrines survive my interpretation." It is "I submit my intellect to God revealing through the Church Christ founded." That is why heresy is not just getting one doctrine wrong. Heresy breaks the principle by which all doctrine is believed. Reject one article obstinately, and the issue is not merely that one article. The issue is the final authority. Aquinas does not leave many options here. The Church as infallible rule. Or the individual as final judge. One is Catholicism. The other is Christianity reduced to private judgment. Choose carefully.

A Mother's Day Letter to America There are some things a man does not write about until he is old enough to understand what he was given. I decided since it is Mother’s Day, I am setting the news cycle aside for a moment, because some truths are bigger than the daily fight. I grew up as one of nine children in a small house in Middletown, Rhode Island. My father was a hard man with a soft heart, and he never asked the country for anything he had not first given it. My mother, Helen, held the center of our home together through every season of our lives. She raised nine of us, fed us, clothed us, prayed over us, taught us right from wrong, and somehow still found the energy to fight for her community. She ran for office at the local level at a time when most women her age were told to stay quiet, and she refused to. She taught us to kneel before God and to stand before no man. She taught us that we serve the country that gave us life. She taught us that strength is measured by what we carry, not by what we complain about. When I look back at every hard day I have ever had, and there have been more than a few, I hear her voice before I hear my own. That is what a mother does. She becomes the first sound in your conscience and the last voice in your prayers. The Founders understood something that this culture has allowed itself to mock. They understood that the Republic does not begin in the Capitol. It begins at the kitchen table. It begins with the mother who teaches her child to read the Bible before he learns to read a screen. It begins with the woman who tells her son that lying is beneath him and that running from his duty is worse than failing at it. John Adams said the Constitution was made for a moral and religious people and would be wholly inadequate for any other. The men who built that moral and religious people were trained at home, by their mothers, long before they ever sat in a classroom or stood in a regiment. We have spent generations laughing at that woman. Hollywood mocked her. The universities re-educated her daughters against her. The federal bureaucracy taxed her family until she had to leave the home she wanted to stay in. The technology companies took her children's attention and sold it to the highest bidder. Then the same culture that broke her down turned around and asked why our young people are anxious, fatherless, faithless, and unwilling to defend the country that raised them. You cannot remove the mother from the Republic and expect the Republic to survive. It is that simple. It has always been that simple. Fifth-generation warfare, the kind I have written about and warned about for years, is fought for the human mind. The terrain is the heart, the imagination, and the soul of a child. The first defender of that terrain is not a soldier. It is a mother. Every American mother who turns off the poison and reads to her child instead is defending the country. Every mother who walks her family into a church on Sunday is defending the country. Every mother who shows up at a school board meeting and refuses to sit down is defending the country. She is protecting the next generation of free citizens, and she is doing it with greater consequence than most of the officials elected to do the same job. That is not sentimental language. It is an operational reality. The enemies of this country know it. They have studied it. They target the family because they understand that if the American family falls, the Nation falls behind it. Mothers are the front line. They have always been the front line. I cannot write this without saying what needs to be said. For ten years, my family carried a weight no family should ever have to carry. Ten years of investigation, of slander, of legal warfare waged by the most powerful institutions in this country against one American and the people who loved him. My wife, Lori, never broke. My sisters never broke. My daughters-in-law never broke. My mother, watching from heaven, never let me break either. If you have ever wondered what holds a man together when the full weight of a corrupt federal system is trying to crush him, I will tell you. It is not bravado. It is not press releases. It is a wife who looks you in the eye at the end of the worst day and tells you to keep going. It is the women in your life who refuse to let evil have the last word. Everyone reading this knows a woman like that. Honor her today and every day after. The Almighty did not make you for comfort. He made you for purpose. There is no purpose more sacred than the one He placed in your hands when He gave you a child. Almighty God, on this Mother's Day, we thank You for the mothers of this Republic. Bless the mothers raising children in fatherless homes. Bless the mothers who buried a son or daughter in uniform. Bless the mothers who pray through the night for a child who has lost his way. Bless the mothers who walk into school board meetings shaking and walk out unbroken. Bless the mothers in heaven who still watch over us, including my own. Strengthen them, protect them, and use them, Lord, to raise up the next generation of patriots this Nation will need. In Your Holy Name we pray, Amen. To every mother reading this, thank you. You are the reason this Republic still has a fighting chance. Happy Mother's Day.

The “Day of Disclosure” now appears truly imminent, and there are things all Catholics must know before Trump announces it. You’ll find them all summarized in this video. 00:00:01 - May 2026 UFO Developments 00:02:33 - What I’ll be doing in this video 00:03:45 - Where to find more info 00:04:28 - Against the so-called (wrong) “Catholic Answer” to aliens 00:06:00 - Dogma, ETs, and Truth 00:07:30 - The Correct Existential Approach to Scripture Immediately Rules out Aliens (Salvation History is Missing No Chapters) 00:09:30 - Against The Fallacy that ET existence “isn’t a theological question” 00:12:20 - What the Christian Scholar ET Promoters Say Aliens Mean for the Faith 00:18:00 - God is good. God the Father is not hiding siblings. God the Son is not a polygamist or adulterer. And God the Holy Spirit is not a monster. 00:20:50 - The Number of Persons in God, The Number of Sacraments, and ETs 00:24:20 - Scripture also directly refutes ETs– Genesis, and the Dichotomy of Creation 00:30:00 - The Primacy and Supremacy of Man Refutes Aliens 00:33:30 - The Fall of Man (and thus the whole Universe) Refutes Aliens 00:35:20 - Dogma against Polygenism Refutes Aliens 00:39:00 - Dogma on Christology Refutes Aliens 00:49:20 - Dogma on Mariology Refutes Aliens 00:53:20 - Dogma on Ecclesiology Refutes Aliens 00:58:50 - Dogma on Eschatology Refutes Aliens 01:05:36 - The Our Father Refutes Aliens 01:09:00 - The Catechism Refutes Aliens 01:14:00 - The Magisterium of Pope St. Zachary Condemns Belief in Aliens 01:17:00 - Papal Condemnations of ET Belief were employed in Giordano Bruno’s Condemnation for promoting ET Belief 01:21:20 - The Magisterium of Pope Pius II Condemns Belief in Aliens 01:23:00 - The Fathers of the Church Refute Alien Belief. St. Augustine. St. Jerome. Tertullian. St. Philastrius. St. Hippolytus. St. John Chrysostom. (Plus, Against Origen’s Heresies) 01:35:15 - The Infallibility of the Sensus Fidelium Refutes Alien Belief. Angels and Men in the Great Chain of Being. 01:46:50 - Discerning the Tree by Its Fruits Rules Out Belief in Aliens. Belief in Extraterrestrials and UFOs have only produced diabolical, destructive fruits–for centuries –while generating zero good fruits. Islam. Mormonism. Adventism. Hinduism. Buddhism. UFO cults. Scientology. Heaven’s Gate. Swedenborgianism. Theosophy. 1947’s Roswell onward. Raelianism’s Antichristic Agenda. Avi Loeb. 02:15:00 - A Summary of Discernment 02:18:30 - Conclusion of Argument. Is rejecting ETs “Limiting God”? 02:22:10 - All the prophecies align here. No other phenomenon in history comes close to ET/UFO belief & expectation in fulfilling what Scripture foretells for the Great Deception. 02:44:44 - The Symmetry of History Entails Another “NHI” Deception is Coming 02:48:00 to End. Trailer for “The Age of Disclosure.”

Hantavirus is a RNA virus, and ivermectin should work against it. Ivermectin blocks RNA viruses from entering the nucleus, inhibits viral replication, disrupts integrity of the viral membrane and can prevent viral replication.