To locate missing flight MH370, I'm analyzing acoustic data. Detected sounds may be debris sinking right on the 7th Arc off Java, matching all factual evidence.

Joined March 2017
97 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Replying to @VirginRadioUK
Reanalysis of hydrophones and seismometers pinpoints a crash site directly on the 7th Arc, 39 miles off the coast of Java. Fitting all of the hard evidence, the anomalous loud noise is consistent with a large section of sinking #MH370 hitting the seabed. 370location.org/2019/02/a-co…
2
8
2,777
Andrew @skippyd, you mention both the barnacles and sound in the search for the #MH370 crash site. The biggest news is that photos of the flaperon barnacles at La Reunion show they were growing on top of abrasions due to beaching. In the study you mention, Herbert et al were using 2015 findings of 15 months of barnacle growth to estimate drift, instead of weeks. They did refine the temperature growth range of the shells to be consistent with the reproductive range of 18-25C. The time scale was previously unknown, but the temperature growth curve is now a good match for the La Reunion sea surface temps from May-July 2015. The sound waves are another significant clue. One of the loudest events of the day on a dozen hydrophones triangulated to the coast of Java. It had previously been assumed to be geologic, but there were no quakes at that time. Detailed study with seismometers found an epicenter directly on the 7th Arc, 56 minutes after the last ping. More recently, a weaker event from the same location was 6 minutes after the ping. That is consistent with one of the engine cores, and later a large section of the plane sinking 3,400 m before impacting the seabed. When Ocean Infinity concluded its search due to rough seas after re-inspecting the Independent Group's @RadiantPhysics candidate site, Victor Iannello posted his recommendation that the Java anomaly site in calm tropical waters should be searched quickly before the $70M contract reportedly expires this month. The seismic epicenter accuracy is about 3 km. OI could search the site in a single dive. Their Armada 86-06 is currently holding station east of Singapore after months being outfitted in Vietnam. Please have a look at Victor's current blog site for details.
After years of dead ends, a clue in the MH370 mystery was hiding in plain sight. Then scientists decoded it. Read the full story at the link below. 🔗: popular-mechanics.visitlink.…
1
2
2
219
It appears that Ocean Infiniti vessel Armada 86-06 is on another sea trial, and is currently just east of Singapore. This new vessel has been under construction in their Vung Tau Vietnam shipyard. It may be the only OI vessel available to search the #MH370 Java candidate site at 8.36S on the 7th Arc before their $70M contract reportedly expires in June. marinetraffic.com/en/ais/hom…
2
2
95
It is sad that Ocean Infinity has concluded the current search for #MH370. I believe that OI has until June before the $70M contract runs out, and there are still viable candidate sites along the 7th Arc. My acoustic candidate site off the coast of Java is in relatively calm tropical waters, 42 miles off the coast of Java, at 8.36S 107.92E directly on the 7th Arc. When the Armada vessels go through the Sunda Straight, they pass just 200 miles from the 7th Arc site. The epicenter is very specific, likely accurate to within 2-3 km. A single Hugin AUV could search the broader area in an afternoon. Here is some background detail since this has never been covered by the news media: The site is indeed over 800 miles from any previous aerial/surface/seabed searches, yet it is an exact match for the SATCOM BTO values and a good fit for all other hard evidence. That may seem impossible, but those previous searches were based on a fundamental assumption that MH370 made no turns shortly after leaving radar, even though it clearly was navigating between waypoints for the previous hour. The assumption is understandable, because optimizing for a single path that best matches the satcom BTO/BFO doesn't work with additional turns. It opens up too many possibilities without new evidence. This post got too long! Anyone interested in more background details please see the full content here: docs.google.com/document/d/e… Some experts have expressed hope that the Java site would eventually be searched, and it has been added to the CAPTIO-N search map. mh370.radiantphysics.com/202… OI, Malaysia, and the ATSB are aware of the Java candidate site but until there is media coverage, it may go unsearched. If the debris field is eventually found at the site, ICAO Annex 13 responsibility for recovery and investigation would shift to Indonesia. They might request help again from Australia who has the resources, with Christmas Island only 200 miles away. Now 12 years on, thoughts are with the NOK, and hope that MH370 can be found to bring closure for us all. More detailed technical reports are at: 370Location.org

1
2
1
115
What can be deduced from this detailed photo of barnacle growth on the #MH370 flaperon when it was found on Reunion Island on July 29, 2015? Note the abrasions of the screws and seals, the indentation of the leading edge, and the size of the barnacles in exposed vs protected sections. Think about the chronology of what happened to the flaperon between the crash of MH370 and this discovery of the flaperon. How does this influence the conclusions from drift models? 370location.org/wp-content/u…
1
2
83
Multiple news outlets are reporting that Malaysian Transport Minister Loke held a press conference Dec 20 announcing that their cabinet has made an "Agreement In Principle" for Ocean Infinity to resume the search for missing flight MH370 in the Indian Ocean. The terms are reportedly similar to their previous agreement in 2018 for a US$70 million "No find No Fee" bounty which was retracted during the search, while OI continued searching for months along the 7th Arc. Reports are that this agreement will be good for 18 months, but the terms are still being negotiated. Some are reporting that the search area will be limited to a 15,000 square km area expanded around previous searches, per input from OI science advisor Simon Maskell based on his widely publicized yet contested WSPR research with Richard Godfrey. Loke has stated to the Malaysian cabinet that the OI proposal meets the threshold of credible new evidence required to resume the search. OI has recently constructed a new fleet of Armada vessels designed for mostly remote operation. They currently have 78m vessels in Singapore, and one ship Armada 78 04 now transiting the Indian Ocean. The prime austral summer season to search in the tempestuous Southern Indian Ocean is halfway gone, despite the OI proposal to Malaysia made in March. As negotiations are reported to continue into January 2025, the search might be accelerated by Malaysia offering broader terms for an open bounty, where any search team could venture to find the crash site based on new evidence. reuters.com/world/asia-pacif…
2
5
12
730
This is so true. For a decade, dogmatism has plagued the search for #MH370. Pseudoscientific and dogmatic speculation now dominates in the media. Those same proponents call for a consensus only to rule out other candidate sites, even viable ones based strictly on factual evidence. I hope your quote gets to the media.
The opposite of science is dogma. No amount of technical training can turn a dogmatist into a scientist. A dogmatist “knows” what is “true”, and set out to “prove” it. A scientist has fewer a priori dogmas about what is, and sets out to find the facts.
3
414
Photo evidence shows that barnacles on the #MH370 flaperon attached and grew for weeks AFTER the debris beached. Shell growth temperature analysis shows that the crash site was in tropical waters. This is consistent with the acoustic site near Java. 370location.org/2024/03/barn…
1
3
505
An MQ-1C Grey Eagle drone only transmits video via microwave link when line-of-sight to a Ground Data Terminal, under 100 km if flying in cumulus clouds. Its base also needs a GDT, support platoon, and 1500 ft runway. So, add Car Nicobar and India to the #MH370 zap conspiracy.
3
293
It wouldn't take 6 months to hoax the #MH370 zap vids if starting with a military grade flight simulator like this one: mvrsimulation.com/technology… It does thermal/IR, stereo, drones, clouds, night, moon phases, explosions, etc. The MQ-1C pilots must get training on simulators.

2
3
346
Cloud coverage @1855Z with #MH370 orb zap marker. SUOMI sat measures cloud top temp. Red is the ground layer to 800m. (Fog/haze). There were no cumulus clouds within 300 km at that time. go.nasa.gov/3s4nmf5
6
8
4,184
#MH370 may have been piloted, and ditched. Don't exclude other factual evidence based on assumptions from a slight frequency shift on the last SATCOM ping as power was failing. Here's the result of the 2021 engines-out piloted ditching of TransAir 810, a B737-200 near Honolulu.
Typical fragmentation for plane crashes in the ocean: SAA295, ITAVIA870, AF447, EGYPT990 An intact, or even partially intact fuselage including entrained water, is highly unlikely for #MH370 @370Location you'll need to cut your energy calculations by another factor of 1000
3
1
6
2,025
Replying to @MOTMalaysia
@MOTMalaysia, please be aware that scientific reanalysis of data from hydrophones and seismometers reveals strong new evidence for an #MH370 crash site epicenter directly on the 7th Arc near Java. I believe this meets your criteria for a renewed search. 370location.org/2019/02/a-co…
MEDIA RELEASE MINISTER OF TRANSPORT MALAYSIA .... On 8 March 2023, it will mark the 9th anniversary of Malaysia Airlines MH370's disappearance.
1
3
9
3,915
The loud Java event is consistent with a large section of sinking #MH370 hitting the seabed. It is not where anyone expected on the 7th Arc, yet the site is a good match for all the hard evidence, including previously dismissed barnacle studies. Site uncertainty is just a few km.
3
9
41
42,125
A new WSPR report shows it's absurd for finding #MH370. Reverse engineering showed previous math errors, so Godfrey changed the algorithm, abandoning his previous claims. The newly divined path has a pilot turning at virtual arcs and following them. @Airline_Ratings Nonsense.
2
2
10
Sadly, @MikeChillit is now blocking responses to the clarification he asked for on "Accepted Science?". A real validation of his #MH370 methods on other flights might have been interesting.
Replying to @MikeChillit
I'm talking about testing your #MH370 methods on other flights. Ex: We have full MH371 PEK-KLIA ACARS data from the same plane, day, and 3F1 satellite. When I apply your geometric method, the endpoint I get is near Guam, not Malaysia. Could you show your map method with MH371?
2
1
Yes! There's a way to bring the #MH370 Java acoustic candidate accuracy to within a debris field. Any ship drops high tonnage weights at 8.36S 107.92E to impact the seabed like the sinking plane. Correlation of the seismic signals calibrates the speed of sound in local crust.
We can search, with the sub, maybe a 2 x 2 nautical mile box. Close enough?
1
1
5
Here is a growing list of #MH370 propaganda bots pushing false conspiracy theories: x.com/i/lists/15174069220469…

1
3
7
I've splained to you before that the plane is given a timeslot to transmit. The plane's sync with it includes uplink time. The downlink time is measured on receipt. What you're measuring is the far longer time #MH370 is simply waiting for its timeslot to come around. Old bunkum.
Replying to @RadiantPhysics
1. Vic its basic physics, the only way you can calculate the distance of #MH370 from the satellite is by using the Round Trip transmission Time of the Handshake(I call it HRTT) as it's a measure of twice the distance from GES to MH370 via I3F1. See Fig 83, Pg100 of my report...
1
2
2
If Malaysia doesn't resume the search, then they can instead be embarassed that they fell short. The call for closure will never go away until #MH370 is found. The govt delegated the searches, and defunded the last one while it was underway. All they need to do is refund it.
1
4
8