Here’s the thing: When you tell emotionally-unstable, social-approval-dependent, weak-minded masses, in whom you have seeded chronic victim complexes, that their policial opponents are literal Nazis, you’re running the risk that few of them might take you seriously and act, not realizing that you’re just manipulating them and leveraging their fragility for … votes. Something to consider.

The boy who claimed to be a girl in a wrestling match is a liar. Because he posed as something he's not. Yet it's the girl who is being called a liar even though we see his hand on her crotch and the expression on her face.

Let’s all remember that it’s absolutely a choice.

Claiming to “identify” as a thing almost always means a person is not, in reality, that thing.

What is the difference between... 1. A male drilling a hole into the ladies locker room so he can peep through it. 2. A male watching a woman through her bedroom window get undressed. 3. A male walking into a woman's locker room and seeing women naked?

I’m super curious what happened to “Believe all women.” 🤔

Let’s follow the excuses of “Any offensive touching/penetration was the direction byproduct of the game” and ‘the perpetrator has an “obvious defense of consent”’ to their logical conclusion. Which of the wrestling rules allow for digital penetration of the vagina (or anus, for argument’s sake)? Because my understanding is that there are, indeed, rules and legal wrestling moves involve close body contact and control of an opponent, but they do not allow any sort of sexual penetration. So how, again, did she consent to this? Or even consent to wrestling a boy? Because it sure sounds like girls are now being expected to give tacit consent for sexual assault to any boys who may be allowed to compete against them?

There was never any consent, you assholes!!!

Of course they did. It’s easy to stand up for your principles when you have little to lose. It’s a helluva lot harder when you have all the power, prestige, and influence you could’ve ever dreamed of. Maybe now would be a good time to stop with the hero worship and deification, acknowledge that everyone has a price, and — most importantly — hold *all* leadership accountable.

Of course they did. It’s easy to stand up for your principles when you have little to lose. It’s a helluva lot harder when you have all the power, prestige, and influence you could’ve ever dreamed of. Maybe now would be a good time to stop with the hero worship and deification, acknowledge that everyone has a price, and — most importantly — hold *all* leadership accountable. And, yeah, I’m looking at you @SecKennedy & @NIHDirector_Jay (as Acting CDC Director).

This is a sexual assault—unknowingly captured by a mom filming her daughter’s wrestling match. Kallie didn’t know her opponent was male. But she knew something was very wrong. Today @ADFLegal helped Kallie sue the WA officials who placed gender ideology above her safety. 🧵⬇️

No, thanks. I’d rather lose all my hair than go on estrogen, which for males atrophies the penis, reduces testicular volume by 50%, destroys libido, atrophies muscle, and skyrockets the risk of stroke, heart attack, Alzheimer’s, and type II diabetes.

I have written a column about recent scandals in science: cancer research that used the wrong antibodies, Alzheimers papers that contained fraud, microplastics research that mistook natural substances for synthetic ones, climate policy based on absurd models and Covid groupthink that brooked no dissent. What's going on? "Scientists, like all of us, are prone to confirmation bias, where they look for evidence to support their hunches and prejudices rather than to challenge them. What kept them honest in the past was that they relished the chance to challenge each other. "Now, with the insistence on “consensus” – another word for groupthink – and a monopoly of funding channels, dogma has been increasingly allowed to stifle debate. It does not help that science reporters, unlike those who tackle politics, the arts or business, often have a culture of deference rather than critique. "The self-correction mechanisms of scientific debate are no longer working well. Yet instead of tackling the problem with humility and reformation, the scientific establishment is inclined to lecture the public for our irrationality. Perhaps it should take a look in the mirror."

Many (including myself) have cited the pernicious influence of TQ activism on LGB acceptance. Still others have noted the illiberal turn of recent gay rights activism. The increasing candor with which the material facts of gay sex are broadcast everywhere may also be playing a role. Whoever interpreted acceptance of homosexuality as a release from basic standards of decorum and decency erred badly, and in fact vindicated the predictions of opponents of the cause. They said it would be this way, and so it is.

It is not healthy to hate reality. Human sexual dimorphism is beautiful and an essential aspect of our lives.

Does the base really believe they are fair, or do they believe that the ends justify the means?

The newly activated social media fans of Hunter Biden’s transparently AI-composed posts don’t care about his blatant nepotism, sketchy motives, or criminal behavior. They only care that the ‘bad’ people don’t like him, because that means they must love and defend him irrespective of what is doing / has done. The PR team sure nailed this one.

Stuff like this makes it very difficult for people to trust elections. California has a serious problem. Raman was in a distant third and now she’s leading every new drop to completely change the outcome. And there could obviously be legitimate explanations (esp since CA allows ballot harvesting, which is a problem in itself).. but no way anyone can look at them taking weeks to count ballot and outcome completely changing in one direction each time without having serious concerns.

Kind of brilliant on Pharma’s part. They certainly know their audience.