Moin
@TeslaBoomerMama .
Hopefully you are free of stress🤣😇.
May I be reaching out to You, as
I am currently working on a project related to deploying Tesla-Robotaxis as a steady income-stream in Germany , now that the Netherlands did approve FSD.🐯
The problem here in Germany is the protectionism regarding the Taxi-Concessions, which are only valid for drives originating in the city conceding.
This would be meaning to write thousands of concession-applications (more of a DoS-attack), and to have to drive back to the conceding city, in order to be allowed to take a new passenger.
But Sixt/Rent-a-Car/… and the like do not have this problem, as the renting person does take the driving-responsibility—except if they are using Driving-assistants.
As Germany changed the Grundgesetz to become CO₂-neutral until 2045, my proposition is to go against this by means of iudication rather than legislation (it is a tendency here in Germany, anyways)—hence hacking there red-tape.
So, in order to prove the CO₂-saving power of avoiding empty drives one needs reliable data.
Can You help out, maybe with contacts to TSLA.
The idea is to build a data-driven case, that questions, whether these existing concessions are violating the Grundgesetz or even countering fairness by prohibiting car-rental for FSD-vehicles.
It would be cool to have aggregated, robust, real-world data—ideally from Tesla-related operations or comparable fleet models—to quantify effects like:
- energy efficiency differences
- utilization rates
- emissions impact regarding the EV’s capability to buffer solar-power vs. traditional taxi systems.
Any help coming from You would be hugely helpful in cracking open the protectionism, we have here.
Maybe we could even be uniting with Elon directly, as he has been helping with unfair law-suits in the past… and this one is in TSLA‘s interest.
Cheers,
Michael.