I do immigration, adult ed & workforce policy @SkillsCoalition. Librarian by background; Philadelphian to my core. Tweets are my own.
Joined December 2011
- Tweets 94,629
- Following 2,433
- Followers 2,696
- Likes 69,794
3,072 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
13 Apr 2023
I've mostly retired from Twitter so as not to provide free material for this platform to run alongside Nazis and Nazi-friendly content.
Look for me via email or (uh) LinkedIn.
1
3
221
Amanda B-S retweeted
8 Nov 2023
November 7, 2023: Incident at Radnor High School
Earlier this evening, after school hours, Radnor High School received a threat, which prompted an immediate and organized evacuation of all students and staff members who were in the building and on campus.
1
1
1
1,521
Amanda B-S retweeted
8 Nov 2023
🚨 #ElectionUpdate: Radnor High School evacuation affects Radnor Ward 2, Precincts 1 & 3. 🏫 New location: Radnor Elementary, 20 Matsonford, Wayne PA. 🗳️ Court has approved voting extension UNTIL 9pm for these 2 precincts ONLY. 🕘 Relocated precincts are now open through 9pm! 📢
1
7
1
1,933
Amanda B-S retweeted
8 Nov 2023
There are likely people in PA who are in your feed; so please-spread the news: if you were moved to Radnor Elementary from its high school, you have until *9pm* to vote--PLEASE VOTE!
(it's gonna be a long night....)
8 Nov 2023
Voters at this location have until 9:00 PM to go Radnor Elementary to vote! Please spread the word.
3
2
1,344
Amanda B-S retweeted
7 Nov 2023
I turned 40 today. It's 10 years since I left my job as a public defender and became a civil rights lawyer. I'm grateful to all the people with the courage to fight the many forms of oppression in our world, especially those who have shown me how to do it with laughter and joy.
93
93
1,488
40,241
Amanda B-S retweeted
8 Nov 2023
Main Line! If you haven’t voted and were headed to your polling place at Radnor High School, it has been relocated due to bomb threat.
1
448
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
Lancaster, CA transformed its downtown in just 8 months by redesigning it's main street from a mini-highway to a tree-lined boulevard.
For the cost of just $11.5M, the project has generated $273M in economic output since 2010, creating 800 jobs, and nearly doubling tax revenue!
444
4,735
32,673
5,937,737
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
By the way, I'm sure I'm not immune to this myself. This is one reason I track the race and gender of my sources -- so that I can identify unconscious bias and look for ways to address it.
x.com/bencasselman/status/13…
2 Jan 2021
A year ago, I did a thread on my efforts to diversify my source list. I tracked the race and gender of my sources again this year. In the interest of accountability, here's an update on my progress.
Here's my original thread for reference:
1
1
24
5,970
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
This is all, of course, particularly relevant on a day when #econtwitter is (yet again) discussing sexism and racism in the field. I don't know if this is worse in my corner of journalism than elsewhere, but I know it happens much too much here.
2
1
17
4,493
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
Maybe it's about age/experience, not gender? Well, it's also happened when I write with @PatcohenNYT, who is older. Maybe people just recognize my incomparable brilliance (lol)? Well it *doesn't* tend to happen when I write with @jimtankersley or with other men.
2
1
18
23,101
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
Credentialism is dumb, especially in journalism (where many of the best people have no formal credentials). But by any objective measure, @jeannasmialek is *more* credentialed than I am. She has an MBA! She wrote a (very good, very well-received) book!
1
1
16
5,107
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
More, recently, this has happened *repeatedly* when writing with @jeannasmialek. I get my share of criticism, fair and unfair, like anyone, but responses to my stories tend to start from a presumption that I know what I'm talking about. The opposite is often true for her.
1
1
13
1,574
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
Natalie and I used to muse about running a proper experiment, where we randomized bylines. We even kicked the idea around with @BetseyStevenson & @JustinWolfers. But then Natalie abandoned me for Mexico :(
3
1
17
2,013
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
Here's the thing, though: He had no way of knowing who'd written which part of the story. And, as it happens, he was *exactly wrong.* The parts he thought were smart were by @Nataliekitro (not a surprise to anyone who knows her!). The parts he didn't like were by me.
2
1
17
1,751
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
The starkest example of this came when someone wrote in to criticize one of our stories. In an email sent only to me, he said that the parts I'd written were smart, but that I'd been let down by my coauthor, who clearly knew nothing about economics.
1
1
9
1,679
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
The first time I really noticed this was when I first joined the Times and @Nataliekitro and I began writing together. We noticed that when we co-wrote a story, my tweets would get a very different reaction than hers (again, of the SAME STORY).
1
1
16
1,812
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
I'm really glad @jeannasmialek decided to share this. I've seen this kind of thing happen WAY too often for me to believe it's a coincidence.
20 Jul 2023
I published two stories with my friend and frequent co-writer @bencasselman yesterday. I took the lead byline on one and he took the lead byline on the other.
Only I got this email yesterday evening.
3
34
145
70,967
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
But I think it's a good reminder not to let that apply unevenly to women, people of color, people from non-elite unis, or people who present in any given way (young, bubbly, etc).
Because you might unfairly doubt someone great — and miss something insightful in the process.
6
10
199
14,912
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
The guy didn't mean to discount someone unfairly (and I'm sure this emailer didn't, either). Nor is being skeptical of journalists, researchers, economists, etc. necessarily a bad thing: It's good to know who and what you're consuming.
1
3
82
11,707
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
For instance, a really smart economist once told me that they didn't take a prominent female researcher very seriously bc everyone knew her co-author did the tough analysis in their studies. But I knew both authors really well, and I knew that the opposite was true.
5
7
113
8,993
Amanda B-S retweeted
20 Jul 2023
I chewed it over first, but I decided to share this because I think it's an unusually clear-cut example of something that is often subtle: People are often disproportionately skeptical of women in economics. I think the subtle version of that can be way more damaging.
2
10
187
12,547