I am happy to share that I have joined the Criminal Law Team of the @Law_Commission and the @MoJGovUK as law reform lawyer, after more than two years as Lecturer in Law at @AstonLawSchool@AstonUniversity. Excited to take part in law reform projects in the criminal justice field
My piece @AJEnglish:
Justice, in ICC Prosecutor @KarimKhanQC's case, resides in the reasoning of judges, not in the debate of diplomats.
The Judicial Panel’s conclusion on Mr Khan’s case should not be discarded because some parties find it inconvenient.
aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/…
He is right. London is a fantastic city, full of life, culture, history, parks, excellent transports and no more dangerous than any other major capital (in fact, safer than many). Social inequality and poverty are the real issues to tackle to improve it. ⬇️
Disinformation about London has become a global industry.
The new “outrage economy” is growing - and it’s eating away at the bonds that hold our society together.
That's why I'm calling for urgent action from social media companies and government.
theguardian.com/media/2026/a…
The High Court has held that the decision to proscribe Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act 2000 was unlawful. This post explains the court's reasoning and discusses some potential weaknesses in it; the government has said it will appeal.
publiclawforeveryone.com/202…
This is the key reasoning on whether a fair balance has been struck.
The Home Secretary will I imagine argue that para 140 is not sufficiently reasoned.
When will an organisation which has carried out three terrorist acts reach "the level, scale and persistent that would justify the application of the criminal law measures that are the consequence of proscription, and the very significant interference with Convention rights consequent on those measures"?
And the HS will probably argue that is a national security decision which is for her to decide, or at least very significant weight be given to her assessment, which is grounded in Parliament''s definition of terrorism under the Terrorism Act 2000.
It will be a very interesting appeal! Certainly raises issues of fundamental rights and the extent to which the HS's powers to proscribe are restricted by human rights law.
The Government has announced implementation of some of our recommendations in the evidence in sexual offences prosecutions project.
🔹 Government announcement: gov.uk/government/news/cruci…
🔹 Summary of our recommendations: lawcom.gov.uk/publication/ev…
Interesting development after years of debating, though I am not convinced that a separate homicide offence is the appropriate way to tackle deadly violence against women and acts as an effective deterrent
We have published part one of our recommendations to reform the law relating to contempt of court ⚖
➡ Full details of this project including the final report and a summary are available on our website on the following link: lawcom.gov.uk/project/contem…
ALT Quoted text that says ''Contempt of court laws serve a vital public interest. They protect the administration of justice, ensure fair trials and maintain public confidence in the justice system, but have become fragmented and unclear in the modern communications age.Our review found significant problems with coherence, consistency and clarity across civil, criminal and family courts. - Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law''
ALT Quoted text that says "Our recommendations modernise the law whilst balancing the right to a fair trial with freedom of expression and the effective administration of justice. We’ve created a clearer framework with four distinct contempt forms, replacing the outdated civil-criminal distinction. These reforms make contempt law fairer and more predictable. - Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law"
We will hear from the Chair of the @Law_Commission, Sir Peter Fraser and Law Commissioner for Criminal Law, Professor Penney Lewis during an evidence session about the work of the Law Commission on Tuesday, November 18 at 2.30pm.
Watch on Parliament Live 🟢
ALT Evidence session. The work of the Law Commission. Justive Committee
Dr Andrea Preziosi @AndreasPrez and Grace Bowland from our criminal law team presented at 'The Vulnerable Accused in the Criminal Justice System' conference, hosted by Cardiff University @cardiffuni
Very sad to learn of the passing of Prof Conor Gearty, who was my PhD external examiner.
He was not just a towering figure in human rights law (and beyond) but also an approachable and fun person.
This excerpt from his report on my PhD thesis has always made me smile ⬇️
We have published our 14th Programme of Law Reform ⚖️
Read more about the programme on our website using the following link: lawcom.gov.uk/news/law-commi…
ALT Quote from Sir Peter Fraser, Chair of the Law Commission, that says: ''With this 14th Programme of Law Reform, we are laying out a substantial body of work that will bring the existing law up to date. As always, there has been great interest in our Programme, and I would like to thank the hundreds of individuals and organisations who responded to our consultation. It is because of these contributions that we have been able to develop this diverse and forward-looking Programme of Law Reform.''
ALT Quote from Sir Peter Fraser, Chair of the Law Commission, that says: ''I am confident that with our focus on our independence, integrity and expertise we will continue to deliver high-quality proposals that Parliament can take forward in these areas.''
ALT Text that says: ''The ten new projects in the 14th Programme:
- Agricultural tenancies
- Commercial leasehold
- Consent in the criminal law
- Deeds
- The defence of insanity
- Desecration of a corpse
- Management of housing estates
- Ownerless land
- Product liability
- Public sector automated decision-making''
📢Call for evidence on homicide law 📢
Excited to be part of this timely review.
If you have a professional or personal interest in the law of homicide, consider submitting evidence to homicide@lawcommission.gov.uk (by Friday 31 October 2025) 📝
We have published a call for evidence for our review of the law of homicide. 📢
lawcom.gov.uk/news/law-commi…
Evidence should be emailed to homicide@lawcommission.gov.uk by Friday 31 October 2025. 🗓️
ALT Photo of the old bailey lady justice status with a title that says: Homicide law: call for evidence published.
ALT Text that says: We are inviting evidence from stakeholders to inform provisional policy development. We are keen to receive evidence about how the law of homicide operates and what the review should consider.Such evidence could include academic writings, reports, data, studies, legislation, case law, guidelines, accounts of personal experiences, and any other material which is relevant to the issues identified in this call for evidence.
ALT Quote from Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law: "We are pleased to launch this important work on the law of homicide by seeking evidence about how the law operates from anyone who is or has been affected by it, whether personally or professionally. We will use the evidence we receive to shape the scope and direction of the project."
Important UKSC judgement, with powerful dissent by Lord Leggatt: courts are "failing in their duty if they simply rubber-stamp assertions made by the executive to justify invading individual liberties without subjecting those assertions to critical scrutiny"
We have published a discussion paper on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the law.
Find out more and read the full paper on our website on the following link: lawcom.gov.uk/news/artificia…
ALT Photo of a digital holographic brain with text that says: ''Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Law: Discussion paper published''
ALT Quote from Sir Peter Fraser, Chair of the Law Commission, that says: AI is developing rapidly and being used in an increasingly wide variety of applications, from automated driving to diagnosing health conditions. This is likely to continue and the degree to which AI will impact the daily life of our society is very considerable. However, with AI’s potential benefits comes potential harm.
ALT Quote from Sir Peter Fraser, Chair of the Law Commission, that says: It is important that the laws of England and Wales evolve so that they are up to the task of the many changes being wrought by AI. The purpose of this paper is to increase awareness of the potential impacts of AI on the law and to encourage discussion of these issues as a step towards future law reform, where it is required.
Watch this video of Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, discussing our final recommendations for the reform of law relating to evidence in sexual offences prosecutions.
Link to the video: youtube.com/watch?v=bXJLELY0…
🚨 Historic Decision 🚨
The @CIJ_ICJ has unanimously confirmed that States are legally obliged to fight climate change under international treaties, customary law, and human rights law.
Here’s what you need to know 🧵⬇️
Crucial recommendations of the Law Commission aiming to enhance the protection of complainants in sexual offences prosecutions while ensuring the defendant's right to a fair trial.
Glad to have been involved in the human rights analysis of this review ⚖️
We have published our recommendations to reform the law relating to evidence in sexual offences prosecutions.
Find out more and read the full report, including an overview of the recommendations, on our website: lawcom.gov.uk/news/new-measu…
ALT Evidence in Sexual Offences Prosecution. We have published a report with our recommendations to reform the law relating to the use of evidence in prosecutions of sexual offences
ALT ‘’Our package of reforms aims to increase understanding of consent and sexual harm and to address the myths that can undermine justice in these cases. We've worked to strike the critical balance between supporting complainants' dignity and privacy while safeguarding defendants' right to a fair trial.’’
- Professor Penney LewisCommissioner for Criminal Law
ALT Recommendations include: reformed restrictions on certain types of evidence that carry the most risk of introducing rape myths and infringing complainants’ right to privacy and dignity; right to be heard and independent legal advice and representation for complainants for requests to access their personal records and for applications to introduce evidence of their sexual behaviour
ALT Recommendations include:
improvements to the directions which judges give to jurors to educate them about myths and misconceptions;
parties permitted to introduce expert evidence of behavioural responses to sexual violence in complex cases;
mandatory training for all legal practitioners on myths and misconceptions;
specialist sexual offences courts within existing court buildings