Chief Scientist at @UmnaiBase. Unleashing limitless human ingenuity through a revolutionary machine learning approach: Hybrid Intelligence. AI PhD

Joined March 2009
302 Photos and videos
A useful test for any AI architecture: Can it explain why it reached a conclusion? Not with a post-hoc explanation. With the actual reasoning process.
29
Why neurosymbolic AI matters AI has spent decades moving between two extremes: Symbolic AI and Statistical AI. Each solved problems the other could not. Neural systems learn well. Symbolic systems reason well. Real-world intelligence requires both. The challenge is not choosing. The challenge is integration. Cobbling up together a system that combines both is possible, like @GaryMarcus has outlined many years ago. Creating an elegant and scalable solution that combines both is where some of the most interesting work in AI is happening today.
2
35
The biggest misconception in AI: People assume intelligence and reasoning are the same thing. They are not. Modern AI is highly intelligent in many respects. That doesn’t mean it reasons the way we think it does. @UmnaiBase
23
Neurosymbolic AI is not a niche research topic. It is the natural evolution of AI. Neural systems learn. Symbolic systems reason. Real-world decision systems require both. @UmnaiBase
33
Predictions inform. Decisions act. Most AI today is still optimized for the former.
16
AI without structure struggles with reasoning. AI without adaptability struggles with reality. The future requires both. @UmnaiBase
25
Now we know why Apple didn’t make the Apple Car: Jony was saving the Pherrari. Italian translation: Madonna! 😱🤌🏻
28
Scale improves capability. It does not automatically produce reasoning. That distinction is becoming increasingly important in AI system design. @UmnaiBase
1
38
Neural systems approximate.
Symbolic systems explain. Modern AI increasingly requires both.
1
26
Symbolic AI is excellent at: •logic •constraints •explicit reasoning
1
16
One gives flexibility.
The other gives structure. This is why purely statistical systems struggle with: •traceability •causality •defensibility The future of AI is not neural versus symbolic. It is neural plus symbolic.
18
Most AI “reasoning” isn’t reasoning at all.
It’s just statistical compression. Here’s how real decision-making actually works in reliable systems 1. Identify
Spot the situation and pull out the key signals.   2. Assess
Analyze risks, constraints, trade-offs, and options.   3. Resolve
Choose an action — and clearly justify it. Today’s LLMs try to mash all three steps into ONE forward pass.
It feels magical.
But it’s a black box.   Speed? Massive win.   Accountability, traceability & safety? Big loss. The strongest AI systems today (advanced agents, thinking-style models, production-grade setups) keep these stages deliberately separate. Result:
→ Debuggable
→ Auditable
→ Trustworthy   This is what separates toy demos from systems you can actually bet your company (or life) on.   Do you want your AI to be fast… or actually reliable?  Quote RT with your take #AI #Reasoning #AgenticAI #xAI
43
The uncomfortable truth about today’s AI: Most models jump straight from input → output. No assessment phase. No guaranteed progress. No real reasoning. They’re just extremely good predictors.
1
70
This is why we still see confident hallucinations, brittle agents, and systems that sound smart but fail when it matters. We’re optimizing for fluency, not reliability.
1
42
So the real question: Is test-time compute process supervision enough… or do we need a deeper architectural shift? What do you think?
41
The first step in intelligence is not reasoning. It is identification.
1
50
Poor identification guarantees poor decisions. This is one reason many AI systems fail in dynamic environments.
1
33
They compress: •detection •reasoning •action into one probabilistic process. Structured AI systems separate these stages explicitly. That separation is critical for accountability and control.
41