Is it more humane to euthanize a baby before it ever experiences pain, or remove it from the womb where it will die an inevitable painful death within hours of birth? And no we’re not only talking about conditions for the mother because that’s a bullshit moving goalpost. Let me talk you through how fucking stupid this entire conversation is. Roughly 1% of ALL abortions are done after 20 weeks. Most of that 1% happens between 20-28 weeks. At third trimester you are talking about future parents that have prepared a nursery, bought a car seat, had a baby shower, planned parental leave, probably even looked at preschools if they’re like me and started fantasizing about the future. We are talking about the FRACTION OF A SINGLE PERCENT that has their entire life planned out around a baby. And you don’t think that if they had to get an abortion that it wouldn’t be both absolutely necessary and the hardest choice they’ve ever had to make in their entire fucking life?

Who the f you calling “the womb”?

If you actually want to reduce the number of abortions, that’s great! We know how to make it happen: free accessible contraceptives for all AND accurate sex education.

“People in the womb”

“men know when they are about to bust. There is no accidents, those accidents were from men who didn't care about the outcome” Sounds like you should be calling out, harassing those men and holing them accountable, flower.

Er… who’s going to explain to Elizabeth how pregnancy literally use uses all your bodily resources? Giving blood is a hell of a lot less invasive and we aren’t legally required to donate even a drop.

“The womb”, “location” “You're altering the meaning of words to emotionally manipulate weak minded individuals into letting you murder innocent children”.

Womp womp, anti abort.

At least they’re somewhat honest about their misogyny. If only more anti aborts could be honest.

Are you admitting, online, that you’re a rapist?

The so called “pro-life”.

Aww i feel like a match maker, two little incels with a common interest in misogyny have found each other. Should I buy a hat?

Exactly!!

Women and girls aren’t a mere “location” or “the womb” and the dehumanisation is noted. Whenever you make a claim anout dehumanisation of non sentient embryos we’ll remind you of this.

I don't understand why this is a go to argument in the 21st century. Contraception is everywhere. Consent to sex and consent to pregnancy became separate things generations ago. Seriously people update your arguments, this abstinence bullshit is from 150 years ago.

It’s just a “consequence” or “inconvenience” when it suits your narrative.

This is an emotional characterization, not an explanation. I’m asking what legal principle makes pregnancy different from every other case of bodily support

Then your argument isn’t that no one has a right to another person’s body. It’s that people can lose that protection because of a prior choice. Why should that principle apply only to pregnancy?

Martin here would like to mansplain how a major life and body altering condition that can cause long lasting conditions and even death is just temporary. Silly women, we do make such a fuss. Gfy, Martin