At 17, I pitched my school's founder to let me build the AP social science edtech. (AP = Advanced Placement.) That was 2 months ago. Today the practice test results are in. AP Human Geography (13 students): avg 5.00 AP US History (9 students): avg 5.00 AP World History (9 students): avg 5.00 A 5 is a perfect score. The national average on these exams is a 2.91. Only 14% of students ever score a 5. In just 6 weeks of using the program, students' practice test scores jumped: Student 1: 1 → 5 Student 2: 2 → 5 Student 3: 2 → 5 Every student got there through advanced, personalized edtech. ( @AlphaSchoolATX is the future of education )

A student with a textbook will outperform a student with ChatGPT. Hear me out. A team at UPenn took about 1,000 high school students and split them into two groups. One group got ChatGPT to help them with their math practice. The other group got nothing but their textbook and notes. The ChatGPT group scored 48% higher on homework than the textbook group. By every metric, it looked like the question was already answered. Then the researchers took ChatGPT away and gave everyone the same exam. The ChatGPT group scored 17% worse than the students who never had it. That is insane. None of this means AI can't work in education. It means a raw chatbot is not a learning tool. (Peer-reviewed, published in PNAS, 2025.)

We spent months perfecting our adaptive learning algorithm. Spaced repetition. Bayesian knowledge tracing. etc. Then we added sound effects and animations to correct answers and it outperformed everything. Students are answering 9x more questions per day. They're attempting 4x more hard questions. They're mastering skills 3x faster.

A week ago I noticed our AP History students couldn't match world leaders to what they actually did. So we built a tier list game. Students rank leaders, then argue against a (somewhat sassy) AI to justify their placement. A week later, the knowledge gap is gone.

Our history students spend 45 minutes a day voluntarily learning geography. Every break, Every lunch... Same thing... GeoGuesser. So we asked the obvious question: Why doesn't this exist for history? We built it. You watch AI footage from a time and place in history. Then you guess where and when it happened. They love it.

Having no friends is making you stupid. Every month of social isolation shrinks the developing brain by 0.27%. Lonely students fall 8 months behind their peers in math. This is not uncommon. 1 in 5 teenagers are lonely. But stopping it is shockingly simple. Stanford had freshmen do one thing. Read stories from older students who said "worrying about fitting in is normal. It goes away." Then write a short letter to future students saying the same. That single hour resulted in the following: → GPA went up every year for 4 straight years → Achievement gap was cut in half for 3 years → 10 years later: better careers, more mentors, happier lives

Inside Alpha Schools: How AI is transforming the traditional education system | video.foxbusiness.com/v/6391… @MorningsMaria @FoxBusiness

Lonely students test 8 months behind in math 1 in 5 teenagers are lonely. → Kids with no friends are 3x more likely to dropout of school. → In some cases, every month of isolation shrinks a child's developing brain by 0.27% It doesn't even take a friend to change the trajectory. Stanford gave lonely students a single one-hour conversation: "that feeling of not fitting in? It's normal. It goes away." The achievement gap was cut in half for three years. A decade later, those students still reported higher well-being.

The education system has been lying to you since second grade. You think you're a visual learner? Or a hands-on learner? You're not. "Learning styles" are a myth.

There's a cheating method so advanced that no school in the world can detect it. We just caught someone using it. An AI agent can now complete online coursework indistinguishably from a real student. Tools like @Openclaw can mimic the arc movement of the mouse, the pace of a student, etc. It operates at the system level, meaning there's nothing for a platform to detect. So how did we catch someone using it? Every student leaves a pattern in their data, and when an AI agent does the work, that pattern looks nothing like a real student. By extrapolating student data and comparing to the mean, you catch a cheater.