We should start to view the software we use daily as an extension of our identity, as significant as our religion. It shapes how we think, interact, and live. From this, it follows that we should have "churches" of software—communities defined by shared values and principles.

ZEC is important because it takes privacy seriously. But this is the hard tradeoff: if privacy hides too much, users may lose supply auditability. Bitcoin’s original privacy model is different: public ledger, auditable supply, visible transaction graph, identities firewalled from keys, new addresses/keys per use, privacy at the edge rather than hidden monetary state. That model is underrated. It says: keep the money supply and settlement record publicly verifiable, then build better wallets, identity separation, selective disclosure, encryption, and payment UX so ordinary users are not exposed by default. Privacy and auditability should not be enemies. The next generation of electronic cash should give users both: private use, public proof. Here is an image from the original Bitcoin whitepaper ... and #BSV's Wallet Toolbox implements it!

Gentle reminder that having your civilization ruled by women and foreigners is literally a biblical curse

i don’t like the attempt from some insiders to paint the zcash bug disclosure as “heroic” it’s not heroic. it’s a systemic problem yes they paid a smart researcher to find bugs and he did. that’s great but the issue isn’t that the bug existed the issue is that zcash, unlike almost any other cryptocurrency, enables a unique class of bugs, where if they’re exploited no one would know this unique class still exists. the fact that they fixed this specific bug is immaterial. mythos could find 8 others. and then mythos 2 bugs can exist in all cryptocurrencies. they can exist in btc or eth or sol. but if someone exploits them we will IMMEDIATELY KNOW and limit the damage with zcash, when someone secretly finds a bug and exploits it, WE WILL NOT KNOW imagine if the kelpdao hack was exploited but it somehow magically wasn’t visible onchain. the attacker stole 300m but no one would know. and aave and other apps would assume everything is fine not knowing that they secretly have a hole in the balance sheet. how much wider would the damage have spread by the time we found out? this is the real issue. not a specific bug. the systemic vulnerability: if a hack happens, we won’t know until much later and a lot of zcashers have been trying to downplay the severity of this fundamental issue for years (including yesterday when this was first disclosed but played down) regardless of this specific bug, i don’t think zcash is a safe place to store meaningful wealth long-term, until the design fundamentally changes i wish zcashers were more open about that. that would’ve been heroic

I am working toward releasing an open-source AI agent project by the end of this year. The aim is not to build another monolithic system competing in the usual “OpenAI versus Claude versus Gemini” framing. That model assumes that intelligence should be concentrated into a small number of enormous general-purpose systems operated from large data centres. I think there is another path. The project will explore an open environment of many specialized agents: individually trained, task-specific, economically accountable systems that can be created, improved, and owned by different people. Rather than one model attempting to do everything, the architecture is based on distributed knowledge, specialization, reputation, and competition. In this model, agents may be trained for narrow domains: law, medicine, engineering, accounting, software, research, education, logistics, personal assistance, verification, translation, and many others. Individuals or small teams could train agents around their own knowledge and experience. Those agents could then be paid for useful work, develop reputations, and compete on accuracy, reliability, cost, and trustworthiness. The goal is to create a market for specialized intelligence rather than a single centralized intelligence provider. This is about open-source AI as an ecosystem: many agents, many owners, many areas of expertise, and many routes to improvement. It is not intended to replace human knowledge with one giant black box. It is intended to let human knowledge be embedded, trained, tested, traded, and extended through specialized systems. The project will invite developers, researchers, domain experts, and individuals who want to build agents around real expertise. The important question is not which large company owns the most powerful model. The important question is how millions of smaller, specialized systems can cooperate, compete, verify one another, and create value in an open environment. That is the direction I intend to pursue.

Satoshi didn't just build digital cash. He was trying to build an entire P2P economy, including onchain poker, an eBay-style marketplace, native escrow systems and more. Most people never knew this existed. Now the original Bitcoin Poker game is being brought back to life on BSV Blockchain (the original chain). This is what Satoshi Vision actually looked like before it got stripped down. The code was always there (GitHub). They just stopped building it. What other early Satoshi ideas will resurrect? "Bitcoin is everything!" #BSV

In the very long run hash rate follows utility and a coin that can act as both a MoE and SoV has more potential utility that a coin that can only serve as a SoV.

Different races have different genetic traits (skin color being the smallest among them) White Europeans are the most threatening to the controllers of our world, as they carry a potent combination of high IQ (on par with Asians) and an extremely high revolutionary spirit/drive for freedom. Individual sovereignty and the passion to fight to the death for it are deeply engrained into European DNA, and for this reason, every time White people realize they're getting fucked over, UNIFY, and rage against the machine, historically, they DESTROY the tyrannical regimes enslaving them. Every single time. This is why ✡️ know they must take advanced steps to destabilize, weaken, and ultimately exterminate White people and countries first and foremost if they wish to complete their path of total world control. (Asians are next on (((their))) list, since as mentioned earlier, they also have very high IQ, and are second in terms of revolutionary spirit thanks to their high connection to honor and heritage. This is why you will soon start seeing the mainstream airwaves flooded with headlines saying "Japan needs more diversity! They need to import infinity Africans and Indians, or they are being bigoted ASIAN SUPREMACISTS!!". It will be the exact same playbook) But I digress... As we've all seen, (((their))) preferred method to destroy Whites' ability to stand up for themselves and retaliate against the globalist agenda is to flood their countries with as many third-world, low-IQ, low impulse-control migrants as possible, in order to: 1) Sow maximum chaos, which will establish a foundational "problem" so they can implement their "solution" (mass surveillance, which of course they'll claim is "for your safety", but will actually just be an additional weapon used to target and suppress whites - just look at the two-tiered policing in UK) 2) Trap Whites into a matrix of constant fear, uncertainty, tax-extortion and wage slavery, which will reduce their ability to build relationships and have children 3) Drain Whites' financial power even further by setting up the political fiscal policy so THEY are the ones paying for their own replacement via importation of millions of migrants into their backyard 4) As a bonus, the migrants will simply rape, stab, shoot, and kill many of the Whites themselves, as the media has already indoctrinated them into believing White people are EVIL and the cause of all of their problems 5) To top all of this off, the Jewish Hollywood/Media machine pushes a TON of propaganda onto White Europeans to abandon their race and marry interracially ("You don't want a White girl, marry a Latina or Asian instead!"), subliminally convincing them to throw away thousands of years of ancestral consistency to walk straight into the globalist plan of an entire world of homogenous, mixed-race brown soup. So...Is the constant, out-of-control mass-immigration being pushed into exclusively White countries, in combination with the relentless media messaging that wHiTe sUpReMaCy is the problem, starting to make sense now? (((They))) want the entire western world to become South Africa. I'm talking to you, my European brothers and sisters: They want your wallet empty, your kids brown, and your genetics wiped from the earth forever. Sadly, this replacement-migration operation has been catastrophically effective. In the last century, the White population of the world has been decimated from 30% to now less than 8% (i.e. imminent extinction if DRASTIC changes aren't made very quickly.) So yes, I am angry, and I do care. I don't want my people to go extinct (and trust me, if you want to see a brighter future for your kids and grandkids, YOU DO TOO, no matter what race you are. Feel free to go to Delhi or Somalia and tell me if you'd like that to be the future of your hometown) #KalergiPlan #Immigration #MassImmigration #WhiteCulture #WhitePride #Diversity #RaceRealism #Nationalism

As off today there are only 1M Bitcoin (BSV) remaining within its network waiting to be mined. However, it will take 114yrs to extract this last 1M coins. Only 300k BSV Bitcoin available for sale across the markets world wide representing $4.5M. Massive supply squeeze due soon.

You won’t believe what astronomical event took place on April 3rd, 33AD. Seriously, look it up

Casual reminder your life’s importance has no correlation to what percentage of the universe your body occupies and you are the tip of the spear of emergent complexity amidst an otherwise entropic universe with the agency to consciously direct the future of it

All new technologies require incentives for mass public adoption and blockchain is no different. But are the current incentives sufficient to encourage blockchain adoption beyond its niche status as a speculative financial instrument? Block rewards were Bitcoin’s original incentives, encouraging miners to process transactions and ensure network security. Miners were also disincentivized to proposing fraudulent blocks that the rest of the network would reject. Dishonest miners learned it wasn’t worth the cost. These incentives got screwed up when Bitcoin was hijacked and morphed into BTC. Transactions were deprioritized, denying miners the TX fees they need to pay their bills. The results are on full display now in the growing number of miners abandoning BTC because it’s no longer profitable. Consumer inertia has killed plenty of innovative tech over the years. Consumers want savings, convenience and new possibilities, but if these are viewed as marginal, the innovation will likely die on the vine. Blockchain technology is still largely siloed, injecting additional consumer uncertainty. I’m dating myself here, but I knew plenty of people who bought Betamax VCRs in the early 1980s and found themselves holding the bag when VHS won that format war. I’m a firm believer in the power of scalable blockchain tech to revolutionize data management for both consumers and enterprises. But I recognize that we have a lot of work to do to convince people of this potential and to offer the right incentives to take this plunge. Consumers will need help onboarding their data to the blockchain. This could be an opening for firms to shoulder this burden but trust will prove hard to come by. Governments could play a role by striking public-private partnerships, offering a measure of trust and accountability. I’ve no interest in preaching to the converted. So if you’re reading this and are either on the fence or uninterested in putting your personal data onchain, what incentives might tip you into giving it a shot?

The transition will be messy We are currently "de-coupling" our identity from our utility. It's okay to feel lost during this—everyone is. We are moving from a world where we were Human Doings back to a world where we are Human Beings.

"...The extreme endgame is: miners defect to the chain(s) where fees subsidize security better → potentially flipping or destabilizing BTC's dominance via economic incentives rather than just market price."

How grok interprets my post: "If a chain achieves dramatically higher fee-to-subsidy ratio, it will attract hashpower away from BTC by offering miners far higher rewards per unit of hash for the same security level...

UPDATE : congrats to @braydenjlangley for claiming bsvapps .com Still available for name-your-own price: bsvbuilders .com stratumlayer .com degenzz .com vibers .social mydegenswag .com

In the next days you gonna understand the 100x fee increase on $BSV. Good night $BTC.

As an entrepreneur, value tokenized matters - not transaction count.