The Daily Mail has attempted to ruin my life. They have called me a 'White supremacist' and a 'Neo Nazi' without evidence, my face with these words on it has been put on the front page of one of the biggest media outlets in Britain, getting seen by millions. They gave me no right to reply nor a heads up that this was coming out. This has completely changed the direction of my life and has already wrecked my work life and public image. If you do want to support me through this struggle here is the link - buymeacoffee.com/angloid

I DETEST KEIR STARMER. Repost if you do too.

Utterly disgraceful. Please don’t share.

Lefties in Brighton Chanting "Rhiannon Whyte deserved it" right to Rhiannon's mothers face When Siobhan raised the issue with the police, they SHOVED her down onto the floor! Rhiannon Whyte was murdered by an illegal immigrant who resided at the hotel that Rhiannon worked at - and lefties think it's okay to mock her death straight to her mother's face. These people are genuinely DISGUSTING

This police bodycam video was banned within 24 hours after mass reporting by police. It shows police trying to beat a man to death in the back of their van after a speech-crime allegation. It was posted under @elon's repeated calls to release the Henry Nowak bodycam footage.

It Took Eight Years to Listen to a Bereaved Father. It Took a By-Election to Act. Molly Russell died in November 2017. Her father has spent the years since asking governments of both colours to act on the algorithms that fed his fourteen-year-old daughter suicide content until she took her own life. Eight years. The most recent stage of that process was a three-month consultation that closed last month, attracting some 100,000 responses. The Prime Minister told bereaved parents gathered in Downing Street that responding properly would be challenging given the volume, and that he would move as fast as possible by the summer recess. That timeline has now collapsed to days. On Monday Starmer will announce what he calls a "game-changing" ban on under-16s using social media, complete with facial age scans, curfews for teenagers and restrictions on addictive features. The announcement lands three days before the Makerfield by-election, in which Andy Burnham, the man positioning himself to challenge Starmer for the Labour leadership, is standing as the party's candidate. Ian Russell does not believe this is a coincidence. He told the Telegraph there was "no reason other than maybe a by-election in Makerfield" for the sudden acceleration, and called it "political opportunism." From a man who buried his fourteen-year-old daughter and has spent eight years pleading with successive governments for exactly this kind of action, the word "disgraceful" carries weight no opposition politician could match. What makes the timing more damning is the evidence Russell is citing against it. Australia introduced its own under-16s ban in December 2025. Six months on, six in ten Australian under-16s remain on the banned platforms because the tech companies have failed to enforce it and children have found ways around it. Russell's own charity, the Molly Rose Foundation, has just published research showing 47 percent of girls aged 13 to 17 are still being shown high-risk content relating to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders every week, under the existing Online Safety Act that was supposed to have already fixed this. Ofcom admits nine in ten children aged 8 to 12 are using platforms with a minimum age of 13, because nobody enforces the limit that already exists. Russell's argument is not that nothing should be done. It is that the government is choosing a headline-grabbing ban it knows does not work, over the harder regulatory work, forcing platforms to redesign addictive features, that experts say would. He fears that when the ban unravels as it has in Australia, the Prime Minister will be left asking why nobody warned him in advance. They did. This week. There is a precedent for how fast this government can move when it chooses to. Liz Kendall's powers to remove "incendiary" online content during a "crisis" went from announcement to legislation within forty-eight hours. Jonathan Hall, the government's own terror watchdog, raised the national security implications of mass migration through proper channels and received silence that has now lasted for weeks, in the same period that Belfast burned. Eighty-seven thousand four hundred and fifty people sit in the asylum appeals backlog, a figure larger than the population of Carlisle, with no comparable urgency attached to it at all. Two different forms of harm to children and to the country. One produced legislation in two days. The other has waited eight years and counting, and finally moved only once a leadership rival's name appeared on a ballot paper. The question Ian Russell is too polite to ask directly is the one that matters most. What, precisely, does this government consider urgent, and for whose benefit? "Ian Russell does not believe this is a coincidence. He told the Telegraph there was "no reason other than maybe a by-election in Makerfield" for the sudden acceleration, and called it "political opportunism.""

🚨UPDATE: A 23 year old “man” has been CHARGED after a woman was RAPED in Arbroath 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Police received reports of a serious sexual assault on bridge street on June 6th. A 23 year old was ARRESTED and CHARGED and is due to appear at Forfar Sheriff Court at a later date. STV reports that “social media posts saying the incident involved ‘illegal’ immigrants are incorrect” - yet NO DETAILS of the suspect have been released. By the way, this story was BURIED by the authorities and we only know about it through social media.

🇬🇧 Q.: What are you most worried about? "Not being able to contact my friends. I use most of my social media to contact my parents & family." — teenager on Starmer's Social Media ban

They are angry.. with Labour! We don’t need to tell them anymore about Labour .. THEY GET IT NOW

Crazy how you have armed Muslims walking through the streets of Europe and the cops don’t seem to care nearly as much as they did when it was Europeans protesting.

If we harvested your organs we could keep at least 10 additional people alive. So why not?