There are 10,000 blockchains designed as an attempt to prove that #Satoshi was wrong about #bitcoin. There is one blockchain designed to prove that Satoshi was right. It’s called #BSV, and it outperforms the rest of the market combined on all relevant technical metrics.

He's quietly changing the argument. The original claim was not: "Some people buy BTC." Nor was it: "BTC has existed for a long time." Nor was it: "Speculators, miners, exchanges, lenders and traders participate in an ecosystem." All of those are trivially true. The claim being pushed was that BTC had somehow won. Won what, exactly? As a payment system? Transaction volume is tiny compared with global payment networks. As money? Almost nobody prices goods, wages, contracts, invoices, taxes, leases, bonds, equities, or trade settlements in it. As a unit of account? Not even its most devoted supporters use it that way. As a medium of exchange? Most activity remains speculation and trading. As an economic network? The overwhelming majority of discussion is still about price. Notice how he starts with "Bitcoin won" and then, when pressed, retreats to "millions of people buy it." Those are not the same statement. Millions of people bought Beanie Babies. Millions bought dot-com stocks. Millions bought houses in 2006. Millions bought NFTs. Participation is not proof of success. Price appreciation is not proof of utility. Speculation is not proof of adoption. And the "nearly two decades" argument is particularly silly. Two decades is nothing in monetary history. Gold has been used for millennia. The pound has existed for centuries. The dollar has existed for centuries. The question is not whether something survives for twenty years. The question is whether it becomes embedded in productive economic activity. What always makes me laugh is the phrase: "When are we allowed to acknowledge success?" Whenever you define success. If success means attracting speculators and generating price appreciation, then congratulations. If success means becoming the world's monetary system, then you're nowhere close. He keeps swapping definitions mid-argument and hoping nobody notices. That's not analysis. That's a shell game. Every time one claim fails, he slides a different claim under the cup and shouts, "Look! Bitcoin won!" while hoping nobody remembers what he was arguing thirty seconds earlier.

20$你可以买到0.000246个BTC，或者1.14个BSV。

If we could turn back time to before the Bitcoin fork, and Satoshi Nakamoto had not disappeared at that time, which technical path among BTC, BCH, and BSV would he have supported?@grok

BSV is capable of becoming the best place to hedge against anything & everything. A global monetary system that never sleeps. BSV — instant transactions, fees next to zero, no central bank or government control, no borders.

BSV (Bitcoin) going from 15 to 30 is the same returns as BTC (Pedocoin) going from 62,500 to 125,000. The only difference is that BSV works, and BTC doesn't, which is why insecure small blocking BTCers talks so much shit against Satoshi. They even go so far as to support a failed Lightning sidechain. We are seeing the opportunity of a lifetime here, since BSV actually learned from Satoshi, and it scales to universe shattering numbers. It can go from 15 to 30 without needing the illegal Tether printing press, is pretty much in the bag. I think BSV goes to 1200 faster than we think. Once it is being used 1,000,000 per coin is on the table.

We are back on bitinfocharts🔥🔥🔥 $BSV taking over with nearly 70% of all transactions💪 #Bsv #Bitcoin #Domination

送我

以书籍传递知识，以行动建设行业。 在这个光速发展的时代，独立判断和理性思考将会越来越值钱，我们准备了100本《图说区块链》，送给忽略噪音、坚持 BUIDL 的人。 关注 RT 即可参与抽奖📖

In fact, the first holder of #BSV was Satoshi Nakamoto.

Why is #BSV bound to rise? Even after BSV/BTC dropping to 0.0002 from 0.05, insiders stay bullish. Their confidence comes from in-depth tech research, not volatile prices. AI will help more see the truth—BSV’s rise is inevitable.

{ "p": "n20", "op": "mint", "tick": "NOTE", "max": "21000000", "lim": "1000" } @SvNote Share and Like and Follow Airdrop