Thrilled to share a new open-access publication in
@LabonaChip: "Next generation microfluidics: fulfilling the promise of lab-on-a-chip technologies."
This perspective article is the result of an @nih_nhlbi workshop that I co-chaired with
@WilburLam of
@CoulterBME and @davesbiochips of
@UMNBME, to chart a roadmap for the future of microfluidic and lab-on-a-chip technology research in biology and medicine.
Leading experts from academic institutions, @nih_nhlbi,
@US_FDA, and industry came together to discuss the current hurdles and future directions.
We aimed to provide specific and clear answers to the following questions:
❓ How can we use microfluidics to enable the next generation of applications?
❓ How can we increase the adoption of microfluidics in biomedical and clinical research laboratories?
❓ How can we translate microfluidic technologies from the bench to the clinic?
Please share with your networks!
@cwru @CaseEngineer @CWRU_MAE @CWRUBME
pubs.rsc.org/en/content/arti…
ALT Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip technologies enable the analysis and manipulation of small fluid volumes and particles at small scales and the control of fluid flow and transport processes at the microscale, leading to the development of new methods to address a broad range of scientific and medical challenges. Microfluidic and lab-on-a-chip technologies have made a noteworthy impact in basic, preclinical, and clinical research, especially in hematology and vascular biology due to the inherent ability of microfluidics to mimic physiologic flow conditions in blood vessels and capillaries. With the potential to significantly impact translational research and clinical diagnostics, technical issues and incentive mismatches have stymied microfluidics from fulfilling this promise. We describe how accessibility, usability, and manufacturability of microfluidic technologies should be improved and how a shift in mindset and incentives within the field is also needed to address these issues.