Fable 5 and Mythos 5 are being offered at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens. When will these tokens be tokens on the Ethereum chain?

Oil and LNG tankers resume Strait of Hormuz transits after three-month halt Come on Bitcoin let's goooooooo

Adding first 555 wallets into GTD. Retweet & Drop EVM

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Senate Banking Committee PASSES the Clarity Act in 15-9 vote. The bill now goes to the full Senate.

Base is now supported by Visa for stablecoin settlement Our mission is to make onchain the standard, and this partnership is a major step towards it It's time to make stablecoin payments a reality for billions

Dead silent while Bitcoin is pumping

Stable coin payments are coming. maybe even something with Doge coin.

Collabs are happening all over CT in your fav community! Remember, Raticals will be FREE for all. Drop EVM wallet & R | T

MINH in a concert, listen to earn with FullOn and Cisum AI.

This debate is frankly becoming ridiculous, and Congress needs to step in and take back control over the passage of the CLARITY Act. Banks want to ban passive yield because it gives consumers an alternative place to hold their digital dollars and get paid 4% yield—as opposed to the average 0.07% interest on their bank deposits. Coinbase wants to allow passive stablecoin yield because it preserves their profit margin and their arrangement with Circle concerning incentives to custody customer USDC on Coinbase. Neither side is obviously willing to budge. Congress therefore needs to step in, settle this once and for all, and make this debate about the consumer. Let consumers have choices about what and where they can earn on their stablecoins. Option 1: If Circle wants to continue paying out a large share of their return on stablecoin treasury reserve assets to Coinbase—so Coinbase can in turn pay 4% yield to consumers as an incentive to mint and hold USDC on Coinbase—that's a business decision for Circle and Coinbase, and a genuine alternative to banks for consumers. Option 2: If banks refuse to share more of the profits they make on fees and lending out customer money in order to pay customers higher interest on deposits, that's also a business decision for the banks—and it also allows consumers to choose where they want to custody their digital dollars. Competition is good. Monopolies are bad. Competition lets the consumer and the market decide. A monopoly limits free markets and leaves the consumer with no options. How about Congress fight for the consumer? #Coinbase #Circle #USDC #CLARITYACT

Regular exercise is linked to slower biological aging - but only in people sleeping 7 hours. People who slept under 6 hours and exercised actually aged faster.

🔥 BREAKING: Bitcoin has now crossed 20,000,000 $BTC mined. The final 1M $BTC will take another 114 years to mine.

Saylor has built a bond backed by bitcoin that pays 3x what treasuries pay.. and institutions are buying it without realizing what they’re actually holding let me break this down simply.. STRC is a share that always trades at $100 not roughly $100. exactly $100. saylor engineered this by using the dividend as a lever… price drops below $100 → raise the dividend → buyers rush in → price goes back to $100 price rises above $100 → lower the dividend → less attractive → price comes back down right now it’s at $100.01 and the machine is working the yield is the story you put $100 in. you get $11.50 back every year. paid monthly. a 10-year US treasury? $4.00/year on the same $100 same “safe” stable price. same $100 in, $100 out one is backed by government promises and one is backed by 720,000 $BTC saylor is offering you 3x the yield and better collateral why can’t institutions just buy bitcoin directly? they can’t pension funds, insurance companies, university endowments.. they have rules “too volatile” “no income” “doesn’t meet distribution requirements” they need stable price monthly cash flow or their compliance department says no so they’ve been stuck with 4% treasuries watching bitcoin go from $10k to $85k $STRC solves this.. - stable price - monthly income - compliance approved - they get their bond wrapper - but underneath it is bitcoin this is the trojan horse they think they’re buying a high-yield preferred share but they’re buying bitcoin exposure in a suit.. every dollar that flows into STRC flows through to strategy strategy uses it to buy more bitcoin more bitcoin = more collateral = better terms to raise more capital = buy more bitcoin the flywheel only needs $BTC to not go to zero

Unpopular opinion: A part of the crypto community have been blindly pointing fingers to CZ and Binance for months, even years, for all kinds of manipulation. Now it turns out it has been likely Jane Street who was responsible for the $LUNA $UST collapse, 10 October liquidations drama and all the '10 am manipulation'. With decent evidence and a lineup of factors that actually make sense (see post below). But even now, let's wait and see. The CZ & Binance FUD had 0 evidence to begin with. It was people blindly following other people who had interests in a weaker Binance who often started the FUD campaigns, and so many went along with it... Maybe it's a good idea to stop blindly accusing everyone or join the next mass-hysteria when there is no evidence.

So far today... 1) Meta revealed plans to roll out stablecoins payments across Facebook, Whatsapp and Instagram (that's 3 billion users); 2) Coinbase turned on stock trading -- 24/5, zero commissions; 3) Kraken rolled out 24/7 perps trading on tokenized stocks; Eight months ago the SEC said "let there be superapps" and the market is responding.

This will dip Bitcoin like hell and will mark the bottom. Back up in September October

Ethzilla pivoted to jet engines anyways. So peter thiel sold ethzilla yet kept bitmine. Me thinks that is good.

True. Once the solar energy generation to robot manufacturing to chip fabrication to AI loop is closed, conventional currency will just get in the way. Just wattage and tonnage will matter, not dollars.