Joined May 2011
- Tweets 62,799
- Following 1,951
- Followers 6,480
- Likes 195,662
8,471 Photos and videos
Motorist ┃ 🪢BIP110 retweeted
People need to stop deferring to @giacomozucco for their opinions on BIP110. His stance is one long rationalization for inaction in a circumstance where it's deeply needed.
24
53
256
8,928
Motorist ┃ 🪢BIP110 retweeted
Reminder that 73% of Bitcoin nodes today support and enforce (to one degree or another) the rules made firm by BIP110; and until last October (2025), that was 99%.
17
65
330
12,433
1
11
61
1,324
BIP110!
Jun 12
⛏️ New Ocean Block Mined ⛏️
Block Height: 953422
Fees: 0.019 BTC
Subsidy Fees: 3.144 BTC
Difficulty: 138.96T
Solver: BIP110
mempool.guide/block/00000000…
1
7
55
967
I'm blocked so someone tell Andy to FOFO with URSF
Jun 12
Today's News by X reads like Andy Back is pro BIP-110 and trying to warn miners to upgrade 🤣🤣🤣
4
7
46
842
Greg: Yeah I'm gonna go with Team Core without having read a single thing from the pull request. 😆
1
4
41
461
Motorist ┃ 🪢BIP110 retweeted
Jun 12
The main reason I didn't merge privatebroadcast to @BitcoinKnots, was that I judged it to be underreviewed and prone to bugs.
Since Core merged it in January, there were several followup fixes proving I was right, even before 31.0 was released.
They went ahead and released it anyway.
We have become aware of a privacy bug in the -privatebroadcast feature, newly introduced in Bitcoin Core 31.0, that may cause the originator’s IP address to be revealed to the receiving peer under certain network conditions. A fix is forthcoming and will be released with 31.1.
22
94
433
38,221
BIP110 will get us BIP110. These guys can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity or remorse for spammers. And they absolutely will not stop ever!
Jun 12
⛏️ New Ocean Block Mined ⛏️
Block Height: 953314
Fees: 0.005 BTC
Subsidy Fees: 3.13 BTC
Difficulty: 138.96T
Solver: BIP110
mempool.guide/block/00000000…
3
8
68
854
Missed you SoV! #BIP110Summer ⛱️
Jun 11
⛏️ New Ocean Block Mined ⛏️
Block Height: 953253
Fees: 0.053 BTC
Subsidy Fees: 3.178 BTC
Difficulty: 138.96T
Solver: SoV
mempool.guide/block/00000000…
5
46
575
At least the Bcashers had the guts to fork off. These corewhores are all talk
Oopsie Daisy!
The spamscam core™️ shitcoiners forgot they actually need to signal opposition to BIP110 to prevent ending up on the real Bitcoin chain...
bip110.org/ursf-monitor
3
5
42
970
Motorist ┃ 🪢BIP110 retweeted
Jun 11
Basically the position all miners should have.
Miners don't decide the rules; they just follow them.
Jun 10
I don't know what that is. I'm just following what the nodes want
10
49
248
7,648
Running RDTS on Bitcoin Knots version 29.3.1 on one of the two nodes that I manage as of today.
Bitcoin is a monetary network, not an arbitrary data storage network.
3
21
294
Vortex blocked a miner because the miner didn't know or even care about OP_IF in tapscript. These corewhores suffer from main character syndrome thinking the world cares about their 50 cent tapscript outputs. I'll bet 99% of Bitcoiners have no idea what Vortex is whining about
5
15
86
1,500
Motorist ┃ 🪢BIP110 retweeted
This is the appropriate stance to take.
It says that as a business, you have tested the incoming UASF and you are ready to adapt to changing consensus rules.
No serious business in Bitcoin can afford to appear negligent when it comes this.
Last time plenty of businesses made announcements similar to the one below, and those that went further offering more vocal support increased their popularity and gained loyal customers as a result - @coinkite and @BULLBITCOIN_ being two great examples.
For purposes of coin.dance reference link, I'm tweeting that TREZOR is at least ready for UASF.
6
38
181
7,955