Today,
@CFS_energy published some major research: five new papers detailing the physics basis for our ARC fusion power plant. Speaking as one of the authors of the first ARC research papers back in 2015 and 2018, I’m stoked by the progress we’ve made refining the physics that will make these machines tick. The depth of thought, the detail of the supercomputer simulations, and the breadth of the 58 co-authors from around the world.
These papers are a sequel to the seven SPARC physics basis papers we published in 2020, cementing our confidence in our approach. All this knowledge, including what we’ve already learned from building SPARC and will learn from running it, builds into the solid foundation we need for tackling all of fusion energy’s challenges.
I also want to call out the value of the peer review process — a core tenet at CFS that brings transparency and independent validation. Fusion is hard, but we’re showing our work so you don’t have to take what we say on faith. We also collaborate to tap into the world’s expertise. In this case two thirds of the papers’ 58 co-authors are from beyond CFS’ walls, working at world-class universities and research institutions around the world.
Their conclusion: When we build ARC, it’ll work. The science behind this plant is solid.
Fusion is super easy to oversell but hard to actually build. Collaborative, peer-reviewed research helps to validate results and builds confidence that it’ll one day become a reality. This is important not only in the science community, but also for investors, governments, customers, and others who want to be well informed when deciding to dedicate valuable resources to the effort. The only way to build and maintain confidence is to put the science up for scrutiny. That’s not giving away trade secrets. Just as every credible deep tech company balances scientific transparency with the protection of intellectual property, every fusion company can and must do the same.
Thank you to all the researchers who produced these papers and to the JPP from
@CambridgeUP for publishing them in a special collection. With this publication, and global confidence in our work, CFS is now able to devote more of our attention to the design and engineering steps on the path to commercial fusion energy.
Today, we laid the physics foundation for our ARC fusion power plant. ⚛️
With 5 deeply researched papers — validated by independent peer review and published in the Journal of Plasma Physics — we’ve shown we've nailed the scientific basics of producing copious amounts of fusion power.
The collective assessment from our 58 co-authors? This machine will work.
No scientific breakthroughs are required to bring this clean, secure, abundant source of energy to the grid. Here is how we're handling fusion's biggest challenges:
⚡ Powering the Grid: Using extremely strong magnets, ARC will confine the plasma long enough to generate 1.1 GW of fusion power. We'll convert that into 400 MW of continuous net electricity — enough to power ~280,000 average American homes.
🛡️ Handling Heat Exhaust: To control a superhot, unruly cloud of charged particles, we're utilizing proven methods to safely handle the heat exhaust that acts as a key practical constraint for tokamaks.
✅ Managing Disruptions: We aren't trying to build an operationally perfect machine. We are pragmatically designing ARC to safely handle disruptions and keep the plasma stable for top performance.
🏗️ Proving the Approach: We're building on decades of tokamak research and supercomputer simulations. And we're proving our approach right now with SPARC, the tokamak we are actively building in Massachusetts.
With our transparency, you don’t have to take our assertions on faith. We are really pushing fusion forward.