Final Challenge to the Najdis on Iran and Arab states: Do you agree with the following statement? If not, explain why. If Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab were alive today, he would declare takfir upon the rulers and systems of virtually all Arab and Muslim states just as his followers explicitly declared the Ottoman Empire to be a kāfir state, allying with external powers to fight it. If your answer is yes, then your selective theological criticism of Iran collapses. By your own principles, Iran (and every other Muslim-majority state) should be branded an apostate regime and uniting with them is as good/bad as uniting with any other Arab state. If your answer is no, then you are either ignorant of the historical and theological positions of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and early Najdism, or you are subordinating your supposed principles to current political alliances or your hand is forced.

[🚨 Clarification and Retraction] I want to publicly apologize to brother @Alhaqqan90 for having attacked him by crossing his face over the issue of Sleight of Hand in a post earlier, or having questioned his Salafiyyah. Feel free to retweet this, as the original post gained many views. The main reason for my mistake and confusion was due to an article that I came across by a trustworthy brother, who quoted Shaykh Ibn Baz Rahimahullah on Illusionary Magic being Kufr Akbar, and the brother explicitly mentioned many times in his video explanation that even the magic that involves no Shayateen whatsoever is still regarded as Kufr Akbar. Although it appears that the brother was mistaken, and what Shaykh Ibn Baz meant was the illusionary magic that still involves the Shayateen and Jinn, by bewitching the eyes of the spectators. In Sha Allah I will inform that brother about this mistake, so this article can be edited and further confusion can be avoided. But of course, I don't in any way blame that brother for my mistake, as it's entirely my own fault for not doing a deep search into this affair myself, before posting a refutation like this. Secondly, after listening to many audios of Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan Hafidhahullah on illusionary magic like the one performed in the circus being Kufr Akbar, it has become clear that the Shaykh is talking about القمرة, and when the Shaykh was asked about the meaning of Al-Qumrah, he explained that it means to bewitch the eyes of the spectators by the help of Shayateen. Video link: youtu.be/p8KzaHNADpg Lastly, I want to say that after having watched many videos of Ahlul Ilm on the ruling on Sleight of Hand, it appears that the majority of them highly condemn it, and declare it to be from deceit and trickery, something that resembles magic, and how it can lead to real magic or believing in the abilities of such performers (for the spectators), and hence it is prohibited. So I advice the brother Al-Haqqan to not post the fatwa for the general public with a general statement that "Ahlul Ilm did not say that it is haram", since your platform reaches millions and how it can open the door to so many evils. JazakAllahu Khaira

Leading Salafi scholar Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz said: “A woman, like a man, has her duty in calling to Allah, enjoining good and forbidding evil. The evidences from the Qur’an and Sunnah apply generally to everyone except where a specific proof makes an exception. The statements of the scholars are also clear on this. Among the Qur’anic evidences is the saying of Allah: ‘The believing men and believing women are allies of one another. They enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong’ [Surah al-Tawbah 9:71], and His saying: ‘You are the best nation produced for mankind: you enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong’ [Surah Āl ʿImrān 3:110]. Therefore, she must call to Allah with the Islamic manners and etiquettes required from a man…” Original Arabic fatwa from Ibn Bāz’s official website

CALL DISCUSSION: Mūsā Jibrīl (AMJ’s Father) Hangs Up on Mohamed.24 During a Discussion on Ḥākimiyyah