1/13: 🚨 @Chainlink Labs has been building some truly groundbreaking technology over the past few years. This 🧵 will dive into each innovation Chainlink is working on and offering, and how each of these services are a staple for the future of finance. Let’s dive in ⬇️

🚨 Day 9 asking @Chainlink to implement onchain guarantees with ZKPs PoR to cryptographically tie revenue to $LINK buybacks via Reserve deposits. 🚨 People expect on-chain enforcement from the cryptographic guarantee guys. Let’s use CL’s own tech to validate Reserve deposits

🚨 Day 8 asking @Chainlink to implement onchain guarantees with ZKPs PoR to cryptographically tie revenue to $LINK buybacks via Reserve deposits. 🚨 People expect on-chain enforcement from the cryptographic guarantee guys. Let’s use CL’s own tech to validate Reserve deposits

🚨 1 week in asking @Chainlink to implement onchain guarantees with ZKPs PoR to cryptographically tie revenue to $LINK buybacks via Reserve deposits. 🚨 Many weeks in without on-chain enforcement and transparency. Let’s use CL’s own tech to validate their Reserve deposits!

Great thread, must read for $LINK holders. The token vision has evolved from the original whitepaper premise, and we’re left guessing. Deviation from the whitepaper vision was inevitable due to a changing market, but to not have any meaningful view on $LINK’s role today is 🚩

🚨 Day 6 of asking @Chainlink to implement onchain guarantees with ZKPs PoR to cryptographically tie revenue to $LINK buybacks via Reserve deposits. 🚨 Cryptographic guarantees > Private, opaque discretion. Let’s use CL’s own tech to validate their Reserve deposits!

🚨 Day 5 of asking @Chainlink to implement onchain guarantees with ZKPs PoR to cryptographically tie revenue to $LINK buybacks via Reserve deposits. 🚨 On-chain guarantees WHOOP private opaque discretion every time! Let’s use CL’s own tech to validate their Reserve deposits!

🚨 Day 4 of asking @Chainlink to implement onchain guarantees with ZKPs PoR to cryptographically tie revenue to $LINK buybacks via Reserve deposits. 🚨 Investors want to see the mechanism tying revenue <> buybacks! Let’s use CL’s own tech to validate their Reserve deposits!

Chainlink makes AI more useful. $LINK 🤖

🚨 Day 3 of asking @Chainlink to implement onchain guarantees with ZKPs PoR to cryptographically tie revenue to $LINK buybacks via Reserve deposits. 🚨 Transparent enforcement beats opaque discretion every time! Let’s use CL’s own tech to validate their Reserve deposits!

1/ Is $LINK worth it — or is Chainlink worth it? Not the same question. The network is winning. The token may be a separate, much weaker bet. A thread on how Chainlink’s success and $LINK’s value quietly decoupled 👇 #Chainlink #LINK 🧵

if we count it for chainlink this way we would need to count it for other protocols too and many are faking revenue that way for chainlink we could verify if they provided us privately some proof of their revenue, we offered to sign an nda too

🚨 Day 1 of asking @Chainlink to implement onchain guarantees with ZKPs PoR to cryptographically tie revenue to $LINK buybacks via Reserve deposits. 🚨 End discretionary decisions by Chainlink Labs. Make tokenomics transparent, verifiable, and fully aligned.

Share this with your favorite $LINK bull and ask them: Why hasn’t Chainlink implemented this? The biggest risk for $LINK today is not adoption. It is value accrual. Proving revenue > Reserve deposits cryptographically is a great solution to this problem.

This is actually a fair question. Chainlink is building infrastructure around trust, verification, Proof of Reserve, DONs, compliance, and increasingly ZK-powered systems. So why not apply the same principles to the Reserve? I’m not asking for customer names, contract values, or confidential business information. I’m asking for cryptographic proof that: Revenue → Payment Abstraction → LINK Purchases → Reserve is occurring at scale. Aggregate attestations, DON verification, or ZK proofs could provide transparency without exposing counterparties. The biggest debate around LINK today isn’t adoption. It’s value accrual. A verifiable Revenue ↔ Reserve mechanism would go a long way toward answering that question. @SergeyNazarov @chainlink

A duck was raised by eagles after being brought to the wrong nest. On February 12, 2025, a nest camera captured an eagle sitting on two eggs when her mate returned with a third mystery egg. Nobody knew where it came from, and even the mother eagle seemed confused for a moment. But instead of pushing it away, she tucked it under her body and raised it with the others. Then the first egg hatched. It wasn’t an eagle.It was a duckling. A week later, the two eagle chicks hatched beside it, and viewers thought the duckling wouldn’t last long in a nest full of predators. But the mother eagle never treated it like food. She treated it like hers. Fifteen weeks later, the same camera showed all three still together, with the duck growing beside the eagle chicks like a sibling. Researchers were stunned when they noticed the mother bringing back fish and softer food, almost like she knew the duckling couldn’t eat the same meat as the others. Now everyone watching is waiting for the next impossible moment. Soon the juvenile eagles will fly away but how will the duck get down from the nest?

Question for $LINK bulls: Why doesn’t Chainlink implement an on-chain mechanism to enforce transparency into the Revenue <> Reserve relationship? With ZKPs, PoR, and DONs; the team has the tools to deliver aggregated, anonymous proof directly linking revenue to reserve inflows.

Fishy flags LayerZero Labs equity as a 🚩- it splits value away from $ZRO holders. Yet on Chainlink, he emphasizes there’s “no conflicting equity, only $LINK” with full alignment. Question: What’s the key difference in how the 2 Labs structured their value incentives?